ENERGY AND MINES NEWS |
Energy
and Mines News:
No Aboriginal Title Required: BC Court of Appeal Allows
First Nations' Civil Claim Against Alcan to Proceed
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015, the BC Court of Appeal released
its decision in Saik'uz First Nation and Stellat'en First
Nation v. Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. In its decision, the
court allowed the claims of the plaintiffs Saik'uz First Nation
and Stellat'en First Nation (Saik'uz and Stellat'en) to proceed
despite the fact that they are, in part, based upon unproven
assertions of Aboriginal title. This precedent-setting decision
could make litigation more attractive to First Nations
unsatisfied with the results of consultation and accommodation.
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. (Alcan) operates the Kenney Dam, located
near the geographic centre of British Columbia, to power Alcan's
aluminum smelter near Kitimat, BC. In 2011, Saik'uz and
Stellat'en commenced an action against Alcan alleging the
company's operation of the dam created a nuisance and breached
the First Nations' riparian rights within an area over which
they claimed Aboriginal title. Neither Saik'uz nor Stellat'en
holds a treaty and neither First Nation has proven aboriginal
title. In response, Alcan sought an order to, among other
things, have the court strike out the First Nations' notice of
civil claim. Read the
full article by Jason Fisher, R.P.F. and Jeff Waatainen with DLA Piper.
LNG Industry in BC Threat to Environment
and Energy Security: Study
BC's liquefied natural gas industry threatens to harm the
environment and erode Canada's energy security, says a new
analysis.
Geoscientist David Hughes, in a study for the Canadian Centre
for Policy Alternatives, warns that LNG is far from the clean
fuel that the BC government portrays it to be. Water filling the
equivalent of nearly 22,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools a year
would be required in the industry's fracking process in drilling
for natural gas in northeast British Columbia, he said.
"Almost all of BC's future gas production is expected to involve
fracking, which requires much more water and produces much more
greenhouse-gas emissions than conventional drilling," Mr. Hughes
said in his 50-page report to be released [May 26th].
"A major public concern is the amount of water and the chemicals
and other additives used in the fracking process, as well as the
potential for contamination of surface water through surface
casing failures and improper disposal of fracking waste water."
View the full article on The Globe and Mail
website.
Exports Won't Hurt Canada's Energy
Security, LNG Sector Says
The lobbying arm of BC's liquefied natural gas industry has
rejected suggestions that Canada doesn't have enough natural gas
to support large-scale exports.
The criticisms, in a geologist's report released [May 26th] by the Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives, focused on how the production levels of
proposed LNG plants would outpace the sector's ability to supply
them from current, known gas fields.
However, the critique doesn't take into account the amount of
gas that is becoming surplus because of dropping exports to the
United States, David Keane, president of the BC LNG Alliance,
said on [May 27th]. Nor,
he said, does it factor in the continued pace of new gas
discoveries.
"I think that the author is cherry-picking some of the facts,"
Keane said. "And I think when you look at the amount of gas
resources available in British Columbia, there is a tremendous
amount of resource available for production and export."
Read more at The Vancouver Sun.
|
ENERGY AND MINES |
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information
|
Carbon Tax Regulation (125/2008) |
May 25/15 |
by Reg 79/2015 |
Long Term Royalty Agreements Regulation (77/2015) |
NEW
May 19/15 |
see Reg 77/2015 |
Mineral Tax Costs and Expenditures Regulation (405/89) |
May 25/15 |
by Reg 85/2015 |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Act |
May 14/15 |
by 2015 Bill 23, c. 23, sections 44 to 47 only (in force by
Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENT NEWS |
Forest
and Environment News:
Cumulative Effects Framework Being
Implemented throughout BC
Over the past 18 months, government has been working on a
cumulative effects framework as part of its commitment to
sustainable natural resource development, Forests, Lands and
Natural Resource Operations Minister Steve Thomson said [May 26th].
He made the comment in response to today's release of the
auditor general's report, Managing the Cumulative Effects
of Natural Resource Development in B.C., given that the
recommendations are consistent with the direction government is
taking. Cumulative effects are defined by the Province as
changes to environmental, social and economic values caused by
the combined effect of past, present and potential future
activities and natural disturbance events.
If not managed, these changes to the environment can compound
and eventually harm the environment. Considering the potential
of cumulative effects is an effective and environmentally
sustainable way to manage natural resource development. Read the
full government news release.
Private Parties Not Liable for
Public Interest Costs
Courts are becoming increasingly resistant to attempts by third
parties, specifically environmental non-governmental
organizations ("ENGOs"), to insert themselves in permitting
processes and judicial reviews where they are not directly
involved and add no relevant expertise. The recent British
Columbia Supreme Court decision in Gagne v. Sharp is a further example
of this trend. This case included the additional wrinkle of an
attempt by the ENGOs involved to have their court costs covered
by the private company on the basis that they were acting in the
"public interest".
Background
In Gagne, several individuals and ENGOs applied for
standing before the Environmental Appeal Board (the "EAB") to
appeal a permit amendment granted to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. The
EAB denied the petitioners standing because they were not
persons aggrieved within the meaning of s. 100(1) of the Environmental Management Act,
S.B.C. 2003, c. 53 (the "EMA"). The petitioners sought a
judicial review of that decision, which resulted in the issue
being sent back to the EAB for reconsideration. The EAB again
denied the petitioners standing. That decision was itself
judicially reviewed. The judicial review was dismissed and the
parties were ordered to bear their own costs of that
application.
Read the full article by Rick Williams and Timothy Bottomer, with the firm Borden
Ladner Gervais.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
There were three Environmental Appeal Board decisions released
in the month of May:
Wildlife Act
Water Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
Fisheries Act Private Prosecution Goes Ahead
In December 2014, Marilyn Burgoon received approval to bring a
private prosecution against Executive Flight Centre Fuel
Services and the Province of British Columbia for violations of
the Fisheries Act related to a large
fuel spill into a sensitive creek. The province took no
enforcement action relating to the spill, likely because of its
own role in causing it.
One or the other senior levels of government usually take over
private environmental prosecutions, but, as of May 19, 2015, the
federal government was still dithering on this one. The entire
burden of prosecuting this case may therefore fall on the
public-spirited Ms. Burgoon, without help from any level of
government.
The case was before Justice Richard Hewson of the BC Provincial
Court on May 19. Reportedly, the federal prosecutor told
Justice Hewson that the federal government had not yet decided
whether it would take over the prosecution. Read the full article by Dianne Saxe with Saxe
Law Office – Environmental Law.
Recent Audits Reveal Wildfire Act Issues
From Forest Practices Board:
A review of forest and range practice audits from 2013 and 2014
finds about half the audits had no issues and half had
non-compliance with legislation or areas requiring improvement,
according to a report released [June 2nd].
Of the problems found, one-third involved problems with wildfire
prevention.
"We published 23 audit reports and 12 of those found 24
practices that either didn't comply with provincial forestry
legislation, or were not considered good practice," said board
chair Tim Ryan. "Of most concern is the trend we are seeing in
problems related to the Wildfire Act and the requirements
to prevent wildfires on logging sites." Read the full article published by the FPB.
Forest Act Amendments
Bill 25, Forests, Lands and Natural Resource
Operations Statutes Amendment Act, 2015, was
granted Royal Assent on May 26th. The intent of the
bill is to make it easier to regulate and manage low-impact
community, recreational, industrial and commercial activity on
Crown lands, streamline fees for transactions under the Land Title Act and allow
non-Canadians to register as land surveyors. Sections of the
bill now in force include amendments to the Forest Act affecting provisions
with respect to timber sale licences, tree farm licences,
forestry licences to cut, and pulpwood agreements.
|
FORESTRY AND
ENVIRONMENT |
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information
|
Closed Areas Regulation (76/84) |
May 26/15 |
by Reg 95/2015 |
Forest Act |
May 28/15 |
by 2015 Bill 25, c. , sections 2 to 7, 9, 13, 14, 18, 20, 21, 25
and 28 only (in force by Royal Assent), Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Land Surveyors Act |
May 28/15 |
by 2015 Bill 25, c. , section 45 only (in force by Royal
Assent), Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations
Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Limited Entry Hunting Regulation (134/93) |
May 26/15 |
by Reg 95/2015 |
Motor Vehicle Prohibition Regulation (196/99) |
May 6/15 |
by Reg 68/2015 |
May 26/15 |
by Reg 95/2015 |
Wildlife Act Commercial Activities Regulation (95/2015) |
May 26/15 |
by Reg 95/2015 |
Wildlife Management Area Use and Access Regulation (24/2015 |
May 6/15 |
by Reg 68/2015 |
Woodlot Licence Planning and Practices Regulation (21/2004) |
May 4/15 |
by Reg 64/2015 |
The content of this document is intended for client use only.
Redistribution to anyone other than Quickscribe clients
(without the prior written consent of Quickscribe) is strictly
prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD.
UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE
To unsubscribe from this service, click here. |