ENERGY AND MINES NEWS |
Energy
and Mines News:
2015 Year in Review: Top 10 Legislative, Regulatory and Policy
Changes of Import to the Canadian Oil and Gas Industry
In 2015 politics drove policy. With new federal and Alberta governments, last
year ushered in unprecedented changes for the Canadian oil and gas industry.
There is more to come. Greenhouse gas regulation and a revised royalty regime
are poised to be two of the sector's leading business challenges in 2016 – along
with stubbornly low price – as energy companies determine the impact to their
bottom lines. There are significant transitions happening to Canada's energy
economy. Pipelines remain elusive. M&A activity is nascent and waiting for
further price and policy clarity. International oil supply, buoyed by an end of
year U.S. policy shift to permit crude exports, continues to be robust. Green
energy and renewable sources will play a larger role in the country's energy
mix. As the year progresses, companies with strong balance sheets and a low cost
of capital are likely to be some of the biggest winners in 2016. Canada's oil
and gas sector looks ahead to not only the implementation of provincial carbon
initiatives, but also the federal government pursuing its own climate change
agenda. Read the
full article by Ross, Alan L.; Marion, Michael A.;
Massicotte, Michael G.; Salmon, Karen A.; Williams, Rick; Binnion, Lorelle of
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.
Proposed BC Mine Plans to Reduce Water Content in
Waste but Still Use Tailings Dams
KGHM International's proposed Ajax copper and gold project will be one of the
first tests of the BC government's approval of waste storage for large open pit
mines after the Mount Polley mine dam failure in 2014. The company, whose parent
is Polish company KGHM Polska Miedz SA, plans to submit its project application
early this month for review by the BC government. It will kick off an 180-day
environmental assessment. The $795-million project is controversial and has met
with community resistance, in part, because of its proximity to Kamloops. KGHM
proposes to reduce water quantities in its mine-waste facility – and entirely
buttress the large dams with rock – to increase safety at the planned mine.
However, it will not be using the dry-stacking technique to store mine waste as
planned in its initial design. That method recommended by an engineering panel
appointed by the BC government to investigate the Mount Polley failure. Read
The Vancouver Sun
article.
BC Takes Action on Chief Inspector of Mines' Recommendations
Source: Canadian Occupational Safety Magazine
In response to the findings and recommendations of the chief inspector of mines'
investigation into the tailings storage facility at Mount Polley Mine in August
2014, the British Columbia government is introducing new regulations and
requirements for tailings storage facilities. "We've learned from this
investigation that in the case of Mount Polley, the allowable margin of risk
around the design, construction and management of the tailings storage facility
was too narrow to allow for an unknown factor, the layer of unstable soils below
the dam embankment," said Energy and Mines Minister Bill Bennett. "We've also
learned that weak practices on the mine site increased the risk of dam failure
and exacerbated environmental consequences from the breach. This is
unacceptable." The report found, as did the Independent Expert Panel in January
2015, that the dam failed because the strength and location of a layer of clay
underneath the dam was not taken into account in the design or in subsequent dam
raises. The chief inspector also found other factors including the slope of the
perimeter embankment, inadequate water management, insufficient beaches and a
sub-excavation at the outside toe of the dam exacerbated the collapse of the dam
and the ensuing environmental damage. While the breach would not have occurred
had it not been for the undetected glaciolaucustrine layer of soils, the
consequences of the breach were made worse by the other factors, said the
government. Although operations on the mine site were not in contravention of
any regulation, the chief inspector found the mine failed to operate using best
available practices. The chief inspector of mines investigation team conducted
approximately 100 interviews and reviewed over 100,000 pages of documents going
back to 1989. This is the largest and most-complex investigation and analysis
ever done in BC. Read the Canadian Occupational Safety Magazine
article.
BC Mulls Rescue as Miners Struggle
Energy and Mines Minister Bill Bennett rang in 2016 with thoughts of a potential
rescue package for BC's beleaguered mining industry on his mind to ward off
potential shutdowns. Options for assistance to mining companies struggling with
low commodity prices could include deferrals on payment of power bills and
delayed payments on mineral taxes, Bennett said in an interview. There are real
potential consequences if the province can't offer any help. "There's urgency to
this," Bennett said. "If we don't find something to do that will help in early
January, then by mid-January, I think you're going to see some mining companies
go down. "You're not going to see bankruptcies, but you're going to see
closures, and we're talking about thousands of jobs." BC mines in 2014 directly
employed 9,954 British Columbians, according to the latest industry survey by
accounting and consulting firm PwC, down from 10,720 a year earlier. See more
here.
Good Faith Efforts to Understand – Supporting a Balanced Approach to
Constitutional and
Procedural Fairness Obligations in Environmental Assessment in British Columbia
From
CLEBC website – Practice Points: This paper, authored by
Becky Black with the Ministry of Justice reviews the purposes of the
environmental assessment ("EA") process and surveys the legal requirements that
frame the relationship between the Crown and proponents and the Crown and First
Nations. Click
here to view a PDF version of the paper.
|
ENERGY AND MINES |
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Hydro and Power Authority Act |
Jan. 1/16 |
by 2014 Bill 2, c. 29, section 63 only (in force by
Reg 247/2015),
Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act |
Mineral Tax Costs and Expenditures Regulation (405/89) |
Dec. 1/15 |
by
Reg 187/2015 |
Mineral Tax Disposition of a Mine Regulation (400/89) |
Dec. 1/15 |
by
Reg 187/2015 |
Mineral Tax General Regulation (401/89) |
Dec. 1/15 |
by
Reg 186/2015 |
Mineral Tax Reclamation Regulation (8/98) |
Dec. 1/15 |
by
Reg 187/2015 |
Mineral Tax Return Form Regulation (86/98) |
Dec. 1/15 |
by
Reg 188/2015 |
Mineral Tenure Act |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Oil and Gas Activities Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, section 146 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Partnership Election Form Regulation (60/91) |
Dec. 1/15 |
by
Reg 187/2015 |
FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENT NEWS |
Forest
and Environment News:
BC Lumber Trade Delegation to Asia Encouraged by Response Climate-change
policies could steer China and Japan toward
use of more value-added wood products
It sounds a bit contradictory to call the province's recent forestry trade mission
to Japan and China a success when British Columbia's lumber shipments into the region
are on the slide. For industry officials, however, the trip at the end of November
was about maintaining their presence, even during a slowdown in those countries,
and to "move up the value chain" in those markets toward higher-value forest products
and away from plain lumber, said industry representative Rick Jeffrey. In that sense,
"it was quite a successful mission," he said. Read The Vancouver Sun
article.
Greater Community Consultation = Better Forestry Decisions
Is your community troubled
by mill closures, lay-offs or forest stewardship plans that don't clearly articulate
what is actually happening on the ground in your area? If yes, then the UBCM's Community
Economic Development (CED) Committee wants to hear from you. Please provide feedback by completing
UBCM's Forestry Survey. At the November CED meeting,
Councillor Brian Frenkel, UBCM's appointment to the Minister's Forests and Range
Practices Advisory Council, advised that the Council is interested in hearing from
communities on forest policy matters. Specifically, the Council would like communities
to identify what specific policy decisions would be better served by greater community
consultation. Acknowledging that communities are more than just stakeholders, Councillor
Frenkel has been advocating to his Advisory Council colleagues for greater community
consultation prior to forestry decisions being made. By undertaking the forestry
survey, UBCM is seeking to provide Councillor Frenkel with the quantitative and
qualitative information necessary to encourage the Advisory Council to respond to
local government concerns. Read the UBCM
article.
Legal Case Study: The Latest Word from the BC Court of Appeal on Cost Recovery under
the EMA On November 20, 2015, the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons
for judgment in the much-anticipated decision of
J.I. Properties Inc. v. PPG Architectural
Coatings Canada Ltd., 2015 BCCA 472, the latest major case dealing with key aspects
of the cost recovery regime under the
Environmental Management Act, S.B.C. 2003,
c. 53 (the "EMA"). The plaintiff, J.I. Properties Inc. ("JIP"), obtained judgment
against the defendant, PPG Architectural Coatings Canada ("PPG"), in the amount
of $4,750.000, respecting the reasonable costs of remediation incurred by JIP in
investigating and remediating James Island (the "Property"), located between the
Saanich Peninsula and Sidney Island, BC. A detailed summary of the reasons of the
trial judge can be found in [the] previous article here. PPG, formerly known as ICI
Canada Inc. ("ICI"), owned the Property from 1954 to 1988 and undertook remediation
of part of the Property from 1968 to 1988. At the time when ICI undertook its remediation
efforts, there were no legislated standards for contaminants in BC. As such, in
conjunction with the BC Ministry of Environment (the "Ministry"), ICI and the Ministry
collectively agreed on the criteria to apply to its remediation. Following a completion
of remediation, ICI obtained a letter from the Ministry confirming that it had remediated
to the standards agreed and that no further environmental concerns existed, based
on the existing land use (commercial and industrial) (the "Comfort Letter"). A restrictive
covenant was registered on title that gave notice to successors in title that portions
of the Property were previously used for manufacturing explosives and batching chemicals,
and that there was a risk of contamination. Read the
full article by Adam Way,
Harper
Grey LLP and published on the BCEIA website.
BC Forestry Watchdog Finds Timber Companies Have Too Much Power
Change recommended
so public interest can be
protected by district managers The BC government has
given away so much power to timber companies that district forest managers no longer
have the authority to stop suspect harvesting practices in the public good, a Forest
Practices Board report reveals. The independent provincial watchdog says that in
recent years it has seen "situations arise where forestry development was putting
local environmental and community values at risk, yet district managers could do
little to affect the development and protect the public interest." The board adds
that "conflicts between resource users could have been avoided if district managers
had the authority to intervene to ensure operations would meet local management
objectives and respect tenured interests." Read The Vancouver Sun
article.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions There were two Environmental Appeal Board decisions
released in the month of December:
Environmental Management Act
Water Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more
information.
|
FORESTRY AND ENVIRONMENT |
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Administrative Review and Appeal Procedure Regulation (12/2004) |
Dec. 18/15 |
by
Reg 240/2015 |
Application Regulation (229/2003) |
REPEALED
Jan. 1/16 |
by
Reg 207/2015 |
Carbon Tax Act |
Jan. 1/16 |
by 2014 Bill 2, c. 29, section 56 only (in force by
Reg 247/2015),
Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act |
Emission Offsets Regulation (393/2008) |
REPEALED
Jan. 1/16 |
by
Reg 250/2015 |
Environmental Appeal Board Procedure Regulation (240/2015) |
NEW
Dec. 18/15 |
see
Reg 240/2015 |
Environmental Appeal Board Procedure Regulation (1/82) |
REPEALED
Dec. 18/15 |
by
Reg 240/2015 |
Environmental Management Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 60 to 65 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Fish Protection Act |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Forest Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 74 to 82 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Forest and Range Practices Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 83 to 89 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Forest Practices Code of BC Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 90 to 93 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Greenhouse Gas Emission Administrative Penalties and Appeals Regulation
(248/2015) |
NEW
Jan. 1/16 |
see
Reg 248/2015 |
Greenhouse Gas Emission Control Regulation (250/2015) |
NEW
Jan. 1/16 |
see
Reg 250/2015 |
Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act |
NEW
Jan. 1/16 |
c. 29 [SBC 2014],
Bill 2, whole Act, except except Part 4, Division 4, s. 43 (1) (f) and item
1 of the Schedule (in force by
Reg 247/2015) |
Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Cap and Trade) Act |
REPEALED
Jan. 1/16 |
by 2014 Bill 2, c. 29, section 55 only (in force by
Reg 247/2015),
Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act |
Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, section 95 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Act |
Jan. 1/16 |
by 2014 Bill 2, c. 29, sections 58 to 62 only (in force by
Reg 247/2015),
Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and Control Act |
Integrated Pest Management Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 109 and 110 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Oil and Gas Activities Act |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 148 and 149 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Private Managed Forest Land Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 152 to 156 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Private Managed Forest Land Regulation (371/2004) |
Dec. 18/15 |
by
Reg 240/2015 |
Range Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, section 157 to 160 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Reporting Regulation (272/2009) |
Dec. 18/15 |
by
Reg 240/2015 |
REPEALED
Jan. 1/16 |
by
Reg 249/2015 |
Waste Discharge Regulation (320/2004) |
Dec. 18/15 |
by
Reg 245/2015 |
Water Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, section 191 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Jan. 1/16 |
by RS2015, c. 1, Revision Schedule (in force by
Reg
257/2015), Local Government Act |
Wildfire Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, sections 194 to 196 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
Wildlife Act |
Dec. 18/15 |
by 2015 Bill 18, c. 10, section 197 only (in force by
Reg 240/2015),
Administrative Tribunals Statutes Amendment Act, 2015 |
The content of this document is intended for client use only. Redistribution to anyone other than Quickscribe clients
(without the prior written consent of Quickscribe) is strictly prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD.
UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE
To unsubscribe from this service, click
here. |