Fall Wrap-Up
The fall legislative session came to an end last Thursday, November 30th, with the passing of four housing-related bills garnering most of the focus in the final stretch. Of the forestry and environmental resource sector, the Forest Statutes Amendment Act, 2023 achieved Royal Assent on November 30th; however, most of the sections in this bill have not yet come into force and will become law at a future date, by regulation. The legislation amends the Forest Act, Forest and Range Practices Act, and Wildfire Act to enact some of the policy changes in the June 2021 Modernizing Forest Policy intentions paper.
It is also worth noting that the Environmental Management Amendment Act, 2023, first introduced back in the spring, achieved Royal Assent on November 8th; however, none of the sections of this Bill have come into force yet. The changes are intended to ensure that owners of large, high-risk industrial projects are responsible for the full cost of environmental cleanup if their projects are abandoned. The Bill will allow for the creation of future regulations that will grant authority to the government to decommission and develop closure plans for prescribed industrial facilities and to require financial assurance and cost recovery tools for cleanup of abandoned and contaminated sites. The regulations will be established after a period of comprehensive engagement and transition.
The following bills were recently introduced:
For more information on the status of these or any other bills, visit our dedicated Bills page, located on the left navigation. If you wish to be notified when these or other changes come into force, check out Quickscribe's customizable alerts via the My Alerts page. Quickscribe alerts are included with your subscription so feel free to select the alerts that work best for you!
Tip: Log in to Quickscribe EnviroFor prior to clicking Reporter links. | │ | ![]() |
View the PDF version of the Reporter. |
Quickscribe Alerts
Are you looking for a more custom
notification that will advise you about important
developments that impact your specific area of interest?
Quickscribe offers numerous customizable
alerts – visit the My Alerts Page. Quickscribe alerts
are included with your subscription, so feel free to select
the alert that works best for you!
|
Want to Track Federal Laws?For notification of federal amendments, we recommend using our Section Tracking tool to keep informed on changes to federal laws. Look for the paw icon adjacent to the sections you wish to track.
Looking for Previous Reporters?We have archived the Quickscribe Reporter going back to 2004. Visit the historical Reporter archives page. |
Clean Economy Tax Credits:
Investment Tax Credit
for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
On August 4, 2023, the Department of Finance released a series of draft legislative proposals (August 4 Proposals) on a
variety of previously announced tax measures. The August 4 Proposals can be found here and the related explanatory notes
can be found here.
The August 4 Proposals include revised draft legislation in respect of the Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Investment Tax Credit (CCUS Tax Credit), draft legislation in respect of the Clean Technology Investment Tax Credit (CTI Tax Credit) and draft legislation specifying the labour requirements (Labour Requirements) that must be satisfied to maximize these tax credits as well as the proposed Clean Hydrogen Tax Credit and Clean Electricity Tax Credit. The Clean Hydrogen Tax Credit and the Clean Electricity Tax Credit were announced in Budget 2023 but the August 4 Proposals do not include draft legislation in respect of these credits.
This article reviews the CCUS Tax Credit. Our review of the CTI Tax Credit can be found here and our review of the Labour Requirements can be found here. Read the full article by Nigel P.J. Johnston, Matthew Kraemer and Adam N. Unick with McCarthy Tetrault.
'No Is a Valid Outcome of
Consultation,' Say
Groups Fighting B.C. Copper Mine Project
A dispute between Taranis Resources (TSXV: TRO; US-OTC: TNREF), the British Columbia government and First Nations groups over
the Thor polymetallic project is brewing over deep drilling exploration permit delays.
On October 16, Taranis escalated the battle to the B.C. Supreme Court, seeking to bypass what it says are excessive delays in the permitting process. At issue is Taranis' complaint against the B.C. Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation (EMLI). Read the BIV article.
Updates to Natural Resource Taxes
The following updates to natural resource taxes were recently posted:
Mining taxes
For more information, visit the BC government website.
BC Hydro Releases Pay Transparency
Report,
Revealing Equal Pay for Men and Women
Canadian provincial utility BC Hydro has released its first public Pay Transparency Report in accordance
with the Province's Pay Transparency Act, and it
reveals there is little to no difference in pay by gender when comparing pay for specific roles.
The release of this report is an important step in building trust and helping to close the gender pay difference that still exists in B.C., the utility said.
BC Hydro said it is committed to transparency and building a workforce that reflects the diversity of the province. It has a workforce of about 7,700 employees. Read the full article by Elizabeth Ingram in the Hydro Review.
BC Energy Regulator Announcements
The following BC Energy Regulator announcements were posted recently:
Visit the BC-ER website for more information.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Shulus Exemption Regulation (263/2021) | Nov. 2/23 | by Reg 230/2023 |
Housekeeping Amendments to Forest
Statutes
Bill 41, the Forests Statutes Amendment Act, 2023,
received Royal Assent on November 30. Some provisions of
the bill are now in force, though most of the
substantial changes
will be brought into force by regulation. Several
housekeeping amendments including repeals of obsolete
provisions have been
made to the Forest Act, and the Forest Act,
Forest and Range Practices Act, Forest Practices Code of British Columbia
Act and Range Act
have been amended to add
the power to prescribe matters that must be considered
in the exercise of a discretionary power under those
Acts.
Changes to Lumber Regulation Will
Drive
Local Manufacturing, Job Growth
Amendments to B.C.'s lumber regulations will open the
door for more wood products to be manufactured in the
province,
strengthening the forestry sector and creating more
family-supporting jobs.
Changes to the Manufactured Forest Products Regulation are being introduced in the Interior of B.C. to expand manufacturing requirements for the export of cedar and cypress lumber. The changes are set to come into effect on Feb. 1, 2024, and will require mills in the Interior to fully manufacture cedar and cypress wood that has been harvested. Read the government news release.
Court Rules Federal Cabinet Acted
Outside Their Authority by
Broadly Designating Plastic Manufactured Items as Toxic
On November 16, 2023, in Responsible Plastic Use Coalition v. Canada
(Environment and Climate Change), the
Federal Court
ruled that the federal cabinet acted outside their
authority when they issued an order (the Order) adding
"Plastic
Manufactured Items" (PMI) to the list of toxic
substances in Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
(CEPA).
The Court held that it was both unreasonable and unconstitutional to add PMI to Schedule 1 because it is too broad of a category. The Court also found the decision of the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change to refuse requests to establish a Board of Review under CEPA before the Order was issued to be unreasonable, because of a lack of justification and transparency in that decision. Read the full article by Jennifer Fairfax, Tommy Gelbman, Sander Duncanson, Jesse Baker, Ankita Gupta, Marleigh Dick, Clare Barrowman and Maeve O'Neill Sanger with Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP.
Tripartite Agreement with First
Nations, BC and
Ottawa Lacks Clarity on Consultation: Lawyer
A tripartite agreement between the federal government,
the province of British Columbia and First Nations
regarding nature
conservation offers strong commentary about the Crown
working in partnership with the Indigenous Peoples and
their
governments. Still, the details of the framework leave
several questions open as to how that will happen,
according to one
lawyer.
Saul Joseph is partner and co-chair of the Indigenous law group at Vancouver-based Clark Wilson. He is also of Coast Salish descent and is a member of the Squamish First Nation (Skwxwú7mesh). He says the wording of the agreement still leaves him with questions. Read the full article by Carolyn Gruske in the Canadian Lawyer.
Treaty 8 Nations Challenge Blueberry
River Agreement
A legal challenge by Treaty 8 First Nations to an
agreement the B.C. government struck with the Blueberry
River First Nation is
adding to the uncertainty that has hung over the
multi-billion dollar natural gas industry in northeastern
B.C. since the
summer of 2021.
That's when the B.C. Supreme Court sided with the Blueberry River First Nation (BRFN) in a cumulative impacts claim.
The court found that, in permitting industrial activities – logging, road-building, oil and gas activities, etc. – the B.C. government had breached the BRFN's Treaty 8 rights to hunt, fish and trap as they had historically done, as per Treaty 8. Read the BIV article.
2022-23 Annual Report Now Available
The Forest Practices Board has published its 2022-23 annual report.
Introduced by
Board Chair Keith Atkinson, the report summarizes Board
accomplishments over the past year and previews of work
in
progress.
Environmental Appeal Board
Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made recently:
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
Forest Appeals Commission
Decisions
The following Forest Appeals Commission decision was made recently:
Visit the Forest Appeals Commission website for more information.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Drainage, Ditch and Dike Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 45, c. 49, sections 22 to 35 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 4), 2023 |
Exemption Regulation (No. 3) (238/2023) | NEW Nov. 24/23 |
see Reg 238/2023 |
Forest Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 41, c. 43, sections 10, 13, 18, 19, 21, 26, 49, 52, 63, 65, 81, 83, 87 and 88 only (in force by Royal Assent), Forests Statutes Amendment Act, 2023 |
Forest and Range Practices Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 41, c. 43, sections 133 and 154 only (in force by Royal Assent), Forests Statutes Amendment Act, 2023 |
Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 41, c. 43, section 161 only (in force by Royal Assent), Forests Statutes Amendment Act, 2023 |
Professional Governance Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 45, c. 49, sections 3 to 15 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 4), 2023 |
Protected Areas of British Columbia Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 42, c. 47, section 25 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 3), 2023 |
Range Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 41, c. 43, section 165 only (in force by Royal Assent), Forests Statutes Amendment Act, 2023 |
Required Consent (Red Chris Porphyry Copper-Gold Mine Amendments) Regulation (234/2023) | NEW Nov. 14/23 |
see Reg 234/2023 |
Water Users' Communities Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 45, c. 49, sections 36 to 38 only (in force by Royal Assent), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 4), 2023 |
Wildfire Act | Nov. 30/23 | by 2023 Bill 41, c. 43, sections 167 and 171 only (in force by Royal Assent), Forests Statutes Amendment Act, 2023 |
Is Everyone Who Employs Anyone Responsible for
Everything Anyone Does? Maybe. SCC Splits on
Scope of Owner / Employer OHSA Obligations
on Construction Projects
On November 10, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-awaited decision in R. v. Greater Sudbury (City),
2023 SCC 28, a case which was anticipated to have significant impact on
the duties of “owners” and “employers” under occupational health and safety legislation. The court split 4:4 on its decision, reflecting a
strongly divided opinion on a complex area of OHS law, namely, whether “owners” of construction projects, who are also “employers” (of
contractors or quality control or contract administration personnel) ought to have strict “employer” duties to ensure compliance by everyone
at the project, or whether, more sensibly and practically, the scope of an owner/employer’s obligations under the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act (“OHSA”)
are determined by contextual factors reflecting the actual work performed on the project and structure of the OHSA. The split decision
means the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision, which the City appealed to the Supreme Court, has not been overturned.
The upshot is that project “owners” and “employers” will have to continue to address the Court of Appeal decision – one we believe to be
unfortunate and one that does not reflect the proper apportionment of OHSA duties on a construction project. Read the full article by Jeremy Warning and John Illingworth with Mathews Dinsdale & Clark LLP.
Consultation on Proposed BC Exposure Limits Based on the
New or Revised 2019 and 2020 ACGIH TLVs for
Selected Chemical Substances
from WorksafeBC
Each
year, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH) publishes a list of substances for which they have set new or
revised Threshold Limit Values (TLVs). A TLV is the airborne
concentration of a chemical substance where it is believed that nearly
all workers may be exposed over a working lifetime and experience no
adverse health effects. TLVs may be expressed as an 8-hour time-weighted
average (TWA), 15-minute short-term exposure limit (STEL), or ceiling
limit. Before adopting new or revised TLVs published by the ACGIH,
WorkSafeBC reviews relevant data on health effects and the availability
of validated sampling methods. WorkSafeBC also consults with
stakeholders on potential implementation issues. WorkSafeBC’s existing
B.C. Exposure Limits (ELs) continue to be in effect until the Board of
Directors makes a decision on which new or revised ACGIH TLVs to adopt
as B.C. ELs. See additional information on WorkSafeBC’s EL review process. We are requesting stakeholder feedback on the proposed ELs for 24 substances. Feedback will be accepted until 4:30 p.m. on Friday, February 2, 2024.
BOD Decision: Permanent Disability Evaluation
Schedule Policy Updates – Ongoing Review
from WorksafeBC
On November 9, 2023, WorkSafeBC’s Board of
Directors approved amendments to the Permanent Disability Evaluation Schedule (Appendix 3) of the Rehabilitation Services & Claims
Manual, Volume II. These amendments are part of the ongoing review of the Permanent Disability Evaluation Schedule to ensure the guidance it
provides remains accurate and up to date.
The amendments:
The amendments apply to all decisions made on or after December 1, 2023.
You can also review the complete Resolution.
New BC Law Helps Injured Workers
Return to Workplace
Employers will need to make sure their employees, who were on a WorkSafeBC claim, have a job to return to starting Jan. 1, 2024.
This is part of a new B.C. law WorkSafeBC has announced to support employees returning to work after getting injured on the job.
Almost
63,000 workers in B.C. were injured while at work in 2022, according to
WorkSafeBC statistics. As of the new year, employers and their
employees will need to work with WorkSafeBC to make sure there is a safe
and positive return-to-work plan for those injured on the job. Read the
BIV article.
Getting Trained and Certified for
Asbestos Abatement Work
from WorksafeBC
To
help keep workers safe from the dangers of asbestos, WorkSafeBC is
implementing mandatory training and certification. Anyone who performs
asbestos abatement work in relation to buildings in B.C. must complete
training from an approved provider and obtain a certificate. The new
requirements will be in effect starting January 1, 2024. Visit the
WorkSafeBC site for further details.
How a Ban on Replacement Workers
Could Improve Health and Safety
In early November, the federal government introduced Bill C-58,
a piece of legislation aimed at prohibiting the practice of employers
bringing in replacement workers during contract disputes. This bill has
far-reaching implications for labour relations and, notably, for the
health and safety of workers in federally regulated industries. Bill
C-58 represents the culmination of decades of efforts by the Canadian
labor movement and fulfills a key demand in the Liberal-NDP confidence
and supply agreement. The legislation would impact several sectors such
as banking, telecommunications, air and rail transportation, trucking,
and more. It is estimated that over one million employees work in
federally regulated industries, with approximately one-third of them
being unionized. Read the full article by Shane Mercer on Canadian Occupational Safety Magazine.
OHS Policies/Guidelines –
Updates
Guidelines – Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
The following new, revised, and retired guidelines are consequential to amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation:
Editorial revisions were also made to the following guidelines:
Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore this and previous updates.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (296/97) | Dec. 1/23 | by Reg 203/2023 |