COMPANY
& FINANCE |
Company and Finance News:
How Not to Buy a Distressed Business
The current economic environment has left many companies with
attractive assets strapped for cash and unable to meet their
obligations. As a result, entities with cash on hand will be in
a position to acquire these companies or their assets at
potentially discounted prices. The following sets out a few key
concepts that should be considered prior to potential purchasers
undertaking such an acquisition. Read the full
article by Stewart
Muglich with Clark Wilson LLP.
BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were published on the
BCSC website in the month of April:
- BCN
2014/05 Notice of Revocation of Recognition Orders for
Investment Dealers Association and Market Regulation Services
Inc.
- BCN
2014/06 Notice of Revised Recognition Order for CDS
Clearing and Depository Services Inc. This notice announces
the revised recognition order for CDS Clearing and Depository
Services Inc. effective April 16, 2014.
- 25-201
– CSA Notice and Request for Comment – Proposed
National Policy 25-201 Guidance for Proxy Advisory Firms
- 21-101
and 23-101 – CSA Notice and Request for Comment
– Proposed Amendments to National Instrument 21-101
Marketplace Operation and National Instrument 23-101 Trading
Rules
- 31-338
– CSA Staff Notice 31-338 Guidance on Dispute Resolution
Services Client Disclosure for Registered Dealers and Advisers
that are not members of a Self-Regulatory Organization (see
also National
Instrument 31-103: Registration Requirements, Exemptions
and Ongoing Registrant Obligations, B.C. Reg.
226A/2009)
For more information visit the BC Securities website.
PST Bulletins
The following PST bulletins and notices were issued in the month
of April:
- Bulletin
PST 303, Warranties, Service Contracts and
Maintenance Agreements
- FIN
357, Application to Cancel PST Registration (Small
Sellers)
- The
Small Business Guide to PST has been revised to
remove information on the PST Education Program (PSTEP) that
wrapped up on March 31
- Bulletin
PST 310, Goods Brought Into BC
- FIN
119, Application for Registration for the Fuel Tax
Refund Program for Persons with Disabilities
- FIN
355/PAC, Application for Refund of Provincial Sales
Tax (PST) Paid on PAC-Funded Purchases
- Bulletin
PST 305, Containers and Packaging Materials
- Bulletin
CT 005, Commercial Air or Marine Services
- Bulletin
PST 300, Special Occasion Liquor Licences
- Bulletin
PST 402, PST Refunds on Charity-Funded Purchases of
Medical Equipment
- Bulletin
MFT-CT 008, International Fuel Tax Agreement and
Motive Fuel User Permits
- Bulletin
PST 134, Aircraft
- Bulletin
PST 202, School Supplies
For more information, visit the Consumer Taxes website.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax Regulation
(93/2013) |
Apr. 17/14 |
by
Reg 64/2014 |
National Instrument 31-103: Registration
Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations
(226A/2009) |
May 1/14 |
by
Reg 73/2014 |
Special Accounts Appropriation and Control Act |
Apr. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 8, c. 4, section 109 only (in force by
Royal Assent),
Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2014 |
Tobacco Tax Act |
Apr. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 8, c. 4, section 111 only (in force
by Royal Assent),
Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2014 |
ENERGY
& MINES |
Energy and Mines News:
BC Minister of Environment Reverses Amendment to Reviewable
Projects Regulation on Sweet Gas Processing Plants
Fort Nelson First Nation puts Government on notice for
upstream LNG development
On April 14, 2014, the BC Government issued Order in Council
(No. 185) amending the Reviewable
Projects Regulation (B.C. Reg 370/2000) to remove the need
for a provincial environmental assessment for sweet natural gas
processing plants (the Proposed Amendment). The Proposed
Amendment, which was to come into effect on April 28, 2014,
would have had significant implications for upstream activities,
especially in northeast BC where shale gas development is
rapidly underway. Following a public outcry in response to the
Proposed Amendment by the Chief of the Fort Nelson First Nation
(FNFN), Environment Minister Mary Polak publicly apologized for
failing to adequately consult with First Nations prior to
approving the Proposed Amendment and announced that the BC
Government would rescind the Proposed Amendment [and] proceed to
undertake discussions with First Nations before proceeding with
the regulatory change. Read
full article by
Selina Lee-Andersen with McCarthy Tetrault.
Joint Review Panel Delivers Site C Dam Report
to Federal and Provincial Governments
Arlene Boone, a third-generation farmer near the Peace River,
said [May 1] she is "sitting on pins and needles" awaiting a
decision on BC Hydro's Site C dam. "Our livelihood is on the
line," said Boone, whose 200 hectares would be affected by the
$7.9-billion dam. "It's a really important time in our lives."
The Joint Review Panel reviewing Site C dam submitted its report
[May 1] to the federal and provincial governments. The report
will be publicly released on May 8 on websites of both the
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and BC's Environmental
Assessment Office project information centre. Boone said that
since the province is already on record wanting Site C, the fate
of the project largely rests with the federal government and
whether it accepts the panel report's recommendations. The two
governments have up to six months to make their decisions. Read
the Vancouver Sun article.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Administrative Penalties Regulation (35/2011) |
Apr. 14/14 |
by
Reg 55/2014 |
Direction No. 6 to the British Columbia
Utilities Commission (29/2014) |
Apr. 14/14 |
by
Reg 60/2014 |
Oil and Gas Activities Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 12, c. 10, sections 1 to 16 only (in
force by Royal Assent),
Natural Gas Development Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
FAMILY
& CHILDREN |
Family and Children
News:
Adult Guardianship Act – Early Consolidation
Coming Soon!
Quickscribe will soon make available an early consolidated
version of the Adult
Guardianship Act as it will read when a majority of
the sections come into force on December 1, 2014. In
the meantime, Tracy
McLean, from Courthouse Libraries BC, wrote the following
article which clarifies which parts of the Act are in force and
which are not:
In theory, it should not be a momentous task to find
out if an Act is in force, but sometimes it really is. If we
resolve a particularly complicated piece of legislation, we know
that there are others out there who may have similar questions.
So we like to write a blog post about it so that someone else,
faced with the same research, doesn't have to start from
scratch. The latest post in our "Tricky Legislation" series is a
particularly confusing one and concerns the Adult
Guardianship Act. Sections were brought in to force by
various proclamations, but some of those proclamations were then
repealed. It's quite the nightmare. So below you will find a
detailed account of the in force information. It's not pretty,
but it's here if you need it.
Bottom line: Is the Adult Guardianship Act
RSBC 1996, c. 6, in force?
Yes, parts of it are in force. Read the full
article.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Court of Appeal Rules (297/2001) |
Apr. 14/14 |
by
Reg 49/2014 |
Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, sections 27 and 28 only (in
force by Royal Assent),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
FOREST
& ENVIRONMENT |
Forest and Environment News:
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
A number of Environmental Appeal Board decisions were released
in the month of April. These include the following:
The 'Honour of the Crown' in the BC Forest Industry
The Haida decision represents the Supreme Court of Canada's
seminal discussion on the Crown's duty to consult with and
accommodate First Nations who claim Aboriginal rights or title,
but have yet to establish those rights or title in court or
through treaty. A recent decision of the BC Supreme Court
indicates that, ten years on, we are still muddling our way
through the aftermath. Moulton Contracting Ltd. v. British
Columbia concerned various claims that the plaintiff
logging contractor advanced against the Province of British
Columbia, the Fort Nelson First Nation (the "Band"), and
particular members of the Band. The dispute concerned two Timber
Sale Licenses (TSLs) that the Province had awarded to the
plaintiff, but that the plaintiff was unable to harvest on
account of a blockade that various Band members erected upon an
access road. The blockade reflected the Band members'
unhappiness over the Province's consultation efforts with
respect to a major amendment made to a forest development plan
on account of the TSLs. Read the full
article by Jeff
Waatainen with Davis LLP.
Water Use in BC: Water Pricing Debate
Generates Widely Differing Views
The Province's discussion paper Pricing
B.C.'s Water has garnered a wide range of opinions
since being released in March. As part of the public
consultation effort regarding the new Water
Sustainability Act (now at [3rd] reading
in the legislature), the public was given until April 8 to
provide its views on water pricing and the Province's water
pricing principles. Although broad in scope, the water-pricing
consultation excluded fees and rentals for hydroelectric
purposes, by far the biggest source of water fees and rentals
for the Province (although as part of its 10-Year Rate Plan for
BC Hydro the
Province has said it will eliminate the highest level of
water rentals in 2019 in regard to annual energy output in
excess of 3000 GWh). Also excluded, by implication, are water
utility rates under the Water
Utility Act. Read the full
article by Jeff
Christian with Lawson Lundell.
WorkSafeBC Head Says Changes Will Come Quickly
Gord Macatee, the new administrator of WorkSafeBC, will tour
sawmills and other high-risk workplaces early next month to get
a grip on the changes needed to restore confidence in the
beleaguered worker-protection agency. WorkSafeBC is under fire
after failing to secure charges in the deaths of four workers in
two separate sawmill explosions months apart. The families and
survivors of the two mill incidents are demanding a public
inquiry, but the provincial government instead appointed Mr.
Macatee to lead a restructuring. Read the Globe And Mail
article.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Controlled Alien Species Regulation (94/2009) |
Apr. 9/14 |
by
Reg 48/2014 |
Environmental Assessment Fee Regulation
(50/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 14/14 |
see
Reg 50/2014 |
Forest Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 5, c. 7, sections 1
to 3, 6 only (in force by Royal Assent),
Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Statutes
Amendment Act, 2014 |
Protected Areas of British Columbia Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 1, c. 11, sections
3, 4, 6, 7 only (in force by Royal Assent),
Protected Areas of British Columbia Amendment Act, 2014 |
Range Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 5, c. 7, sections 8
to 21, 23 to 25, 27 to 33, 35 to 63 (in force by Royal Assent),
Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Statutes
Amendment Act, 2014 |
Sustainable Environment Fund Act |
Apr. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 8, c. 4, section 110
only (in force by Royal Assent),
Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2014 |
Wildfire Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 5, c. 7, section 64
only (in force by Royal Assent),
Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Statutes
Amendment Act, 2014 |
Wildlife Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 5, c. 7, section 71
only (in force by Royal Assent),
Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Statutes
Amendment Act, 2014 |
HEALTH |
A Prescription for Reform Needed in Health Care
System
Personal information: New proposals offer ways to protect
sensitive files in digital age
As Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia,
[Elizabeth Denham's] role is to inform the public about their
information and privacy rights, and bring forward issues and new
developments affecting these important rights. [Recently, she
issued] a special report, A Prescription for Legislative Reform,
to promote an informed dialogue between patients, health
practitioners, researchers and government about the collection
and use of personal information in the health care system. This
dialogue is urgently needed. While the drive to improve health
outcomes and new technologies create new opportunities in the
research and treatment of disease, government's current legal
framework for the use of personal health information is strained
by this new reality. Read the Vancouver Sun
article.
CIHI Report Supports Ministry of Health's
New Strategic Priorities Document
A report from the Canadian Institute of Health Information on
health-care system efficiency is further evidence of the need
for continual improvement and change for the better in health
care. The report supports the Ministry of Health's new strategic
priority document, to improve patient experience and outcomes at
the best price for taxpayers. "Our experience in managing the
health-care system is similar to what CIHI has found in their
measure of health-system efficiency. Their report emphasizes the
importance of using health-care resources effectively," said
Health Minister Terry Lake. "Health care is continually evolving
and our priority document shows that we're willing to explore
and make changes that improve the system for patients without
burdening the rest of government and taxpayers." The CIHI
report, Measuring the Level of Determinants of Health System
Efficiency, suggests that certain factors affect health-care
efficiency, such as greater investment in primary care,
lifestyle choices and equitable access to physicians. It
suggested improving the health-care system in those areas could
substantially reduce premature deaths in Canada without
increasing health-care funding. Read government news
release.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Drug Price Regulation (344/2012) |
Apr. 1/14 |
by
Reg 344/2012 |
Medical and Health Care Services Regulation
(426/97) |
Apr. 14/14 |
by
Reg 53/2014 |
LABOUR
& EMPLOYMENT |
Labour and Employment News:
British Columbia Privacy Commissioner
Recommends
Limits on Police Information Checks
Employers who rely on police information checks to
assess the suitability of prospective employees may
now have to make do with less information.
In an investigation report released this month, the British
Columbia Information and Privacy Commissioner made
recommendations which will limit information disclosed by police
departments in employment-related police information checks.
Until recently, police departments in British Columbia have
included information about prior criminal convictions,
outstanding charges, contact with the police during an
investigation (e.g., as a suspect or witness), and apprehensions
under the Mental
Health Act in employment-related police information
checks. These checks are done with the consent of the employee,
for employers and employees who are not covered by the Criminal
Records Review Act ("CRRA"). The Commissioner found
that, although these checks can be a valuable screening tool,
the scope of information provided to employers –
particularly mental health information and non-conviction
information which has not been tested in court – was more
than was necessary, and not in compliance with privacy
legislation. Read the full
article by Rosalie
Cress with McCarthy Tetrault.
Can [An Employer] Terminate an Employee Who is
Off
Sick With the Flu? – Human Rights Code
Ahhh, flu season. That most charming time of the year, full of
runny noses, stuffed sinuses, headaches, pain and soreness,
often resulting in significant employee absence. As an employer,
flu season is often the source of great frustration. You often
need to juggle work schedules on short notice, requiring others
step up and fill the vacancies, and just when it seems like you
might be out from under the worst of it, another wave of flu and
absences hits. In rare instances, this frustration can boil over
and employers may even dismiss an ill employee. You might think
that dismissal of an ill employee would be considered
discrimination and, consequently, that the Human
Rights Code would [come] into play. Section 13 of
the Human Rights Code prohibits discrimination in
employment on several grounds including physical or mental
disability. Over the years, disability under the Human
Rights Code and other similar pieces of legislation has
been interpreted to include many ailments and conditions
including depression, alcoholism, migraine headaches,
kleptomania, drug addiction, obesity, and there is even one case
where smoking was considered a disability. So of course the flu
would be considered a disability too, right? Surprisingly, the
answer is generally no. Read the full
article by Daniel
Sorensen with Waterston Law Group LLP.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Political Staff Oath Regulation (66/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 17/14 |
see
Reg 66/2014 |
Public Service Oath Regulation (228/2007) |
Apr. 17/14 |
by
Reg 66/2014 |
Social Services Employers Regulation (84/2003) |
Apr. 17/14 |
by
Reg 65/2014 |
Standards of Conduct for Political Staff
Regulation (67/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 17/14 |
see
Reg 67/2014 |
Workers Compensation Act |
Apr. 14/14 |
by
Reg 61/2014 |
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
Local Government News:
Liability for Contaminated Sites
All public sector entities, local governments included, will be
required to report liability for remediation of contaminated
sites for calendar years beginning on or after April 1, 2014.
The requirement is for contaminated sites that the public sector
entity has responsibility for and that have contamination that
exceeds environmental standards. Five criteria must be met for
remediation of contaminated sites to be recognized in local
government accounting:
- An environmental standard exists
- Contamination exceeds the environmental standard
- The government is directly responsible or accepts
responsibility
- It is expected that future economic benefits will be given
up, and
- A reasonable estimate of the amount can be made.
Read the full news
release on the UBCM website.
Upcoming Changes in Land Use Planning
The legislature recently introduced [proposed] amendments to the
Agricultural
Land Commission Act and the Local
Government Act which, if adopted into law, will
(among other things) streamline development of land in the
Agricultural Land Reserve, and insulate in-stream development
projects from increases in development cost charges. Read the full
article by Erika
Lambert and Olga
Rivkin with the law firm Bull Housser.
Feedback Wanted on Landfill Criteria Paper
The Ministry of Environment is looking for local government
feedback on their draft Landfill Criteria for Municipal Solid
Waste. The paper is a guidance document for landfill
construction, operation and closure to ensure environmental
protection. The draft
document will be posted for comment until May 31, 2014.
The Ministry will review and incorporate stakeholder feedback
into the final document. Once finalized, it will apply to all
municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills in British Columbia. The
draft document criteria build on a 1993 paper that was developed
to enhance environmental protection and minimize environmental
impacts from landfills. The revised version is designed to offer
comprehensive landfill management guidance, provide a basis for
consistent decision-making across the province, and facilitate a
compliance process. The changes reflect current regulatory
requirements and emphasize more environmentally sustainable
landfilling practices that have been developed over years. Many
of these practices are already implemented by local governments
at MSW landfills in British Columbia. Read UBCM news
release.
SMS – LoGo Notebook Spring Edition
The firm Stewart McDannold Stuart recently released the Spring
2014 edition of the LoGo Notebook. This edition includes a
number of topics of interest to local governments, including:
- Greater Vancouver Regional District v. Township of
Langley and Wall; GVRD v. Langley (Township)
and Hendricks: Regional Growth Strategies – Just
Wishful Thinking?
- When Is An Aerodrome Not An Aerodrome?
- A Blues-Singing Busker Gets No Satisfaction From The BC
Supreme Court
- Local
Elections Campaign Financing Act
- Bill
17 – Land Use Contracts (The Final Chapter)
Read the latest
edition on the SMS website.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Auditor General for Local Government Act |
Apr. 25/14 |
section 35 (7) repeals section 35 (2) to (6) |
Power Engineers, Boiler, Pressure
Vessel and Refrigeration Safety Regulation (104/2004) |
Apr. 1/14 |
section 3 (4) repeals section 3 (3) |
Apr. 3/14 |
by
Reg 47/2014 |
Prescribed Rates for the District of Kent
(54/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 14/14 |
see
Reg 54/2014 |
Taxation (Rural Area) Act Regulation (387/82) |
Apr. 17/14 |
by
Reg 69/2014 |
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Miscellaneous News:
New BC Bill Could Conceal Animal
Health Risks, Privacy Chief Says
BC's privacy commissioner is raising concerns about broad
secrecy provisions in new legislation to deal with animal health
risks. Elizabeth Denham warns that the Animal
Health Act overrides the freedom of information law
and prevents the public from getting access to certain records
on the reporting and testing of animal diseases. She said the
law could stop the public from learning about some outbreaks,
and would block scientists, journalists and citizens from
reviewing the government's performance. "What if an individual
wants to know how the record is on animal health surveillance?"
she said in an interview. "Even five, ten years down the road,
there's no legal right of access to those records." Denham said
the act, in many cases, leaves it to a minister to decide what
to tell the public. "And there's no oversight by my office or
anyone else to make sure that the government is disclosing
information in the public interest," she said. The province is
overhauling the law to limit the spread of disease and better
control outbreaks, some of which can pose a risk to humans.
Agriculture Minister Norm Letnick was unavailable for comment,
but his office said confidentiality provisions in the
legislation are necessary to get farmers to report diseases.
Read the Times Colonist article.
Lawyers Question Civil Forfeiture's Evidence
Policies
Abandoning its most high-profile case could indicate British
Columbia's Civil Forfeiture Office is thinking twice about files
in which evidence was unlawfully obtained, say lawyers who have
worked on forfeiture cases. The government agency was created in
2006 to fight organized crime, but has come to have a far
broader reach and has been criticized for the people it targets
and the fairness of the process. The office – which was
the subject of a recent Globe and Mail investigation
– [in late April] ended its pursuit of a Fraser Valley
home belonging to David Lloydsmith, a former electrician on
partial disability. A police search of Mr. Lloydsmith's home
turned up marijuana plants, but a judge ruled the search to be
warrantless and in violation of the Charter. Mr.
Lloydsmith was never charged with a crime, and the officer
involved in the search characterized the offence as "minor."
Read the
full article on the Globe and Mail website.
Minister Says Consultation Will Not Change or
Delay ALR Legislation
Bill Bennett insists contentious bill will pass this
session
The BC cabinet minister who is the driving force behind
proposed changes to the province's Agricultural Land Reserve
says the contentious legislation will not be delayed or
fundamentally altered as a result of new public consultation.
Core Review Minister Bill Bennett said [April 24] that a
provincewide town hall proposed by Agriculture Minister Norm
Letnick is respectful and welcome, but won't lead to major
revisions or delays on the ALR bill before the legislature.
"There is the potential for changes, but they wouldn't be
anything fundamental," Bennett said in an interview. "The bill
is going to pass this session, and it's going to have two zones
in it. There is tremendous support in the Peace (region), and
Cariboo and Kootenays for this." Read
more.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Police Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, sections
37, 38, 41 (in force by Royal Assent),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Provincial Court Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, sections
45 and 46 only (in force by Royal Assent),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters Regulation
(298/77) |
Apr. 17/14 |
by
Reg 70/2014 |
MOTOR
VEHICLE & TRAFFIC |
Motor Vehicle and Traffic
News:
BC Mulls Tougher Distracted Driving Laws
Distracted driving is killing more British Columbians than
impaired driving and Attorney General Suzanne Anton said [in
April] the government is considering higher fines and
penalties to put the brakes on the carnage. Anton said it
doesn't appear British Columbians are getting the message that
distracted driving is deadly, and along with increased
penalties she's considering public education campaigns similar
to previous initiatives targeting seatbelt use and drinking
and driving. BC's distracted driver law was introduced in
2010, that included a fine of $167 for people caught talking
on their mobile devices while driving. Drivers caught texting
or emailing receive an additional three penalty points and the
fine. Read story
reported on Global BC.
"It Is Contrary to Public Policy to Permit
Contracts out of Liability for
Damages for Personal Injuries" in BC Vehicle Collision Cases
Important reasons for judgment were released [recently] by the
BC Court of Appeal confirming, in divided reasons, that it is
contrary to public policy to allow a vehicle owner/operator to
contract out of liability for damages for personal injuries.
In [a recent] case (Niedermeyer
v. Charlton) the Plaintiff embarked on a tour to
Whistler BC to participate in various activities including a
zip lining experience. Transportation to and from Whistler was
provided the by the Defendant. During the return trip the bus
driver "allowed the bus to get too close to the edge of
the road and…the bus went off the road and over the
edge". The Plaintiff suffered severe injuries including
a fractured neck, ribs and vertebra. Read the full
article by Erik Magraken on his blog BC Injury Law.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Motor Vehicle Fees Regulation
(334/91) |
Apr. 1/14 |
by
Reg 260/2013 |
May 1/14 |
Transportation Act |
Apr. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 8, c. 4, section 112 only (in force by
Royal Assent),
Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2014 |
PROPERTY
& REAL ESTATE |
Property and Real Estate News:
Strata Property Amendments
Changes to the BC Strata
Property Act came into force on April 9th
as a result of the passage of Bill 12, Natural
Gas Development Statues Amendment Act. These changes
included:
- streamlining some definitions by removing excess wording;
- requiring strata corporations to prepare lists of storage
locker numbers belonging to owners;
- allowing an owner of a strata lot, who was the purchaser of
the strata lot before the conveyance to the owner, to apply
for an order regarding the removal of claims of lien;
- allowing the costs of depreciation reports to come out of
the operating fund of a strata corporation;
- requiring a majority vote for certain expenditures from the
contingency reserve fund; and
- clarifying who owes a special levy before a strata lot is
conveyed to a purchaser.
Effective July 16, 2014, amendments to the Strata Property
Regulation, B.C. Reg. 43/2000, will make changes to strata
corporation investments.
BC to Review Tenancy Laws that May Trap Women
in Bad Relationships – Residential Tenancy Act
The province is reviewing a call from women's groups to change
BC's tenancy laws amid suggestions they inadvertently stop women
from fleeing domestic violence. On [April 23], legal advocates
with West Coast LEAF warned that women dealing with abuse face
financial penalties under the Residential
Tenancy Act if they break their fixed-term lease.
Backed by Atira Women's Resource Society, the groups are
proposing an exception in abuse cases. "It's a small change,"
West Coast LEAF's legal director Laura Track said. "Given the
incredible barriers that already exist for women fleeing
domestic violence…we think having an additional barrier
created by tenancy legislation is unconscionable." Under current
laws, tenants who break fixed-term housing leases must pay their
landlord the balance of remaining rent in their contract and may
be forced to pay for advertising to find a tenant to replace
them. For low-income women in particular, these "significant
financial penalties" act as a deterrent to escaping abuse.
See more.
Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters Regulation
Amendments
A $12.5-million annual investment from the Governments of Canada
and British Columbia will enhance the existing provincial
Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters (SAFER) program and Rental
Assistance Program (RAP), providing greater benefits to
low-income seniors and family households renting in the private
market. "Our government is committed to working with British
Columbia to develop and implement local solutions to housing,"
said the Honourable Alice Wong, Minister of State (Seniors).
"These new investments are especially helping seniors access
safe and affordable housing that meets their needs."
"Rental assistance programs give low-income
households more options. They are flexible, giving families and
seniors the choice of where they want to live and the cash
assistance helps with housing costs," said Rich Coleman, Deputy
Premier and Minister Responsible for Housing. "The provincial
government helped 26,700 households last year with the RAP and
SAFER programs, and we hope to assist even more with these
changes." Effective April 1, 2014, the maximum amount of rent
used to calculate benefits for both programs was increased. The
change to the monthly payment will vary. On average, families
will see an extra $40 per month; the average increase for
seniors will be about $34 per month. Both are non-taxable
benefits. In addition, for SAFER, the minimum monthly benefit
will increase to $25, up from $1 and the income eligibility
level will rise by approximately 9% throughout the province.
Read the government
news release.
BC Real Estate Development Marketing Act
– Revisited
For at least 10 years prior to the market correction in 2008,
strata lot prices in British Columbia were on a decidedly upward
trend and, not surprisingly, the market attracted not just
homebuyers, but also speculators who signed purchase agreements
with a view to making a profit by either assigning their
contracts or selling their strata lots. In the wake of the
correction, litigation under the Real
Estate Development Marketing Act (British Columbia)
(REDMA) proliferated as homebuyers and speculators alike, faced
with the realization that they had agreed to pay more than
current market value, sought to avoid their obligations by
identifying technical deficiencies in the disclosure made by
developers as required by REDMA. Many of the ensuing court
decisions, mindful of the consumer protection objectives of
REDMA, strictly applied the legislation in favour of the
purchaser, regardless of his or her motive in seeking to avoid a
purchase agreement. Consequently, real estate industry
participants have called for changes to REDMA to achieve a
better balance between the goal of consumer protection and the
practical realities of the development industry. On March 10,
2014, BC Attorney General and Minister of Justice Suzanne Anton
introduced Bill 17, the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act, 2014, in the BC Legislature.
Bill 17 includes several proposed amendments and additions to
REDMA which, according to the government, will "bring clarity to
the scope of purchasers' remedies and certainty to the
enforceability of purchasers' contracts" and are "designed to
increase industry efficiency and provide purchasers with a more
readable disclosure statement." Read the full
article by Scott
Smythe with McCarthy Tetrault.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Land Title Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 5, c. 7, section 7
only (in force by Royal Assent),
Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Statutes
Amendment Act, 2014 |
Property Transfer Tax Exemption Regulation No.
14 (56/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 14/14 |
see
Reg 56/2014 |
Property Transfer Tax Exemption Regulation No.
15 (57/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 14/14 |
see
Reg 57/2014 |
Property Transfer Tax Exemption Regulation No.
16 (58/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 14/14 |
see
Reg 58/2014 |
Property Transfer Tax Exemption Regulation No.
17 (59/2014) |
NEW
Apr. 14/14 |
see
Reg 59/2014 |
Strata Property Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 12, c. 10, sections
39 to 44 only (in force by Royal Assent),
Natural Gas Development Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
WILLS
& ESTATES |
Wills and Estates News:
Subpoena for Testamentary Document
or Grant – New Probate Rules
Supposing you are the executor of a will of someone who has
died, intend to apply for a grant of probate of the will, but
someone else has the original will, but won't give it to you.
What can you or your lawyer do? In British Columbia the new
probate rules, which came into effect on March 31, 2014, provide
a mechanism to require a person in possession of the will to
deliver it to a court registry. Rule 25-12 of the Supreme
Court Civil Rules replaces, and is broader than, the old
citation to bring in a will under the previous rules. Read the full
article by Stan Rule on his blog Rule of Law.
WESA Amendments
The Wills,
Estates and Succession Act ("WESA") was recently
amended by Bill 14, Justice
Statutes Amendment Act. These changes came into
force on April 9th. Changes include:
- correcting cross-references and changing the language of
some sections to clarify meaning;
- ensuring that WESA reflects changes brought about by the
coming into force of parts of the Adult
Guardianship and Planning Statutes Amendment Act, 2007;
- updating the definition of "spouse" to reflect changes
brought about by the enactment of the Family
Law Act;
- correcting the operation of section 23 of WESA, which sets
out the distribution of a deceased person's estate when they
have no will;
- ensuring that WESA works with the proposed new probate
rules; and
- clarifying three sections relating to the role or
responsibilities of the Public Guardian and Trustee.
Transitioning to WESA
As mentioned on several occasions, the Wills,
Estates and Succession Act ("WESA") is now in force.
That does not mean, however, that every legislative provision
that WESA replaces is entirely obsolete. Sections 185-190 of
WESA contain the transition provisions and provide, in part, as
follows:
- the provisions regarding the validity of wills and the
legal effect of wills apply if the will-maker died on or after
the date WESA came into force, even if the will was executed
prior to that date. However, the WESA provisions will not
invalidate a previously valid will or revive a previously
revoked will;
- the variation of wills provisions apply if the
will-maker died on or after the date WESA came into force.
However, these provisions are generally the same as under the
Wills
Variation Act;
Read the full
article by Gordon
Behan with Clark Wilson LLP.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Estates of Missing Persons Act |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, sections
71 and 72 only (in force by Royal Assent),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Wills, Estates and Succession Act |
Apr. 1/14 |
by 2009 Bill 4, c. 13, section
268 only (in force by
Reg 42/2014),
Wills, Estates and Succession Act, as amended by 2011 Bill
10, c. 6, section 56 (in force by
Reg 148/2013) |
Apr. 9/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, sections
50 to 66 only (in force by Royal Assent),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
The
content
of this document is intended for client use only.
Redistribution to anyone other than Quickscribe clients
(without the prior written consent of Quickscribe) is strictly
prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD. |