COMPANY
& FINANCE |
Company and Finance News:
CSA Adopt Enhanced Oil and
Gas Disclosure Rules
[On December 4th], the CSA released amendments to NI
51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities
intended to promote the disclosure of resources other than
reserves, while also improving flexibility for issuers. As
discussed when the changes
were first proposed in October 2013, the amendments will,
among other things, permit, in certain circumstances, disclosure
prepared under an alternative resources evaluation standard such
as the SEC's reserves disclosure regime, provide clearer
guidance for the disclosure of contingent and prospective
resources, introduce a principle-based approach to the
disclosure of oil and gas metrics and clarify the concept of
marketability in the reporting of oil and gas volumes. Read the
full article
by Keith
Chatwin with Stikeman Elliott LLP.
Canadian Securities Regulators Propose to
Revive and Streamline Rights Offerings
On November 27, 2014, the Canadian Securities Administrators
("CSA") published for comment proposed amendments (the "Proposed
Amendments") to the rules governing rights offerings in Canada.
Rights offerings are offerings of securities to shareholders of
the issuer existing at the time of the offering. The CSA
acknowledges that rights offerings can be one of the fairer ways
for issuers to raise capital as they provide security holders
with an opportunity to protect themselves from dilution.
However, the CSA also recognizes that reporting issuers very
seldom use prospectus-exempt rights offerings because of the
associated time and cost.
The Proposed Amendments are designed to make prospectus-exempt
rights offerings more attractive to reporting issuers by
creating a streamlined prospectus exemption (the "Proposed
Exemption"). The Proposed Exemption updates requirements and
removes the current regulatory review process prior to use of
the rights offering circular. The CSA have also proposed
increased investor protection through the addition of civil
liability for secondary market disclosure and the introduction
of a user-friendly form of rights offering circular. Read the full
article by Bernard
Pinsky with Clark Wilson LLP.
BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were published on the
BCSC website in the month of November:
- BCN
2014/11 – Notice of Revised Recognition Order for
Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada
The British Columbia Securities Commission is issuing a
revised recognition order for the Mutual Fund Dealers
Association of Canada.
- 45-106
– CSA Notice and Request for Comment – Proposed
Amendments to National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus and
Registration Exemptions, National Instrument 41-101 General
Prospectus Requirements, National Instrument 44-101 Short
Form Prospectus Distributions, and National Instrument
45-102 Resale Restrictions and Proposed Repeal of National
Instrument 45-101 Rights Offerings
The proposed amendments would create a streamlined prospectus
exemption for rights offerings by reporting issuers and update
other requirements related to rights offerings. The comment
period ends on February 25, 2015.
- 24-102
– Notice and Request for Comment on Proposed National
Instrument 24-102 Clearing Agency Requirements and
Related Companion Policy 24-102CP
This notice describes proposed amendments to National
Instrument 24-102 Clearing Agency Requirements and related
documents. The comment period for this proposal expires on
February 10, 2015.
For more information visit the BC Securities website.
PST Bulletins
The following PST bulletins and notices were issued in the month
of November:
For more information, visit the Consumer Taxes website.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax Regulation (392/2008) |
Jan. 1/15 |
by
Reg 179/2014 |
Income Tax Act |
Jan. 1/15 |
by 2012 Bill 54, c. 35, section 252 only (in force by Royal
Assent),
Provincial Sales Tax Act |
Insurance Premium Tax Act Interest Regulation (52/2003) |
Dec. 1/14 |
by
Reg 207/2014 |
National Instrument 81-102: Investment Funds (2/2000) |
Jan. 1/15 |
by
Reg 180/2014 |
ENERGY
& MINES |
Energy
and Mines News:
BC Court: No Abuse of Water
Approvals for Fracking
Because fracking consumes a huge amount of water, Western Canada
Wilderness Committee (WCWC) and the Sierra Club of B.C. recently
challenged how the BC government grants water use approvals to
oil and gas companies. The government gives a series of short
term approvals for fracking, frequently renewed, without
regulating the cumulative water taking of an entire project.
Does this violate B.C.'s Water Act. WCWC
et al. v. B.C. (Oil and Gas Commission) et al., 2014
BCSC 1919?
At issue was the interpretation of s.
8 of the Act and, specifically, whether the provincial oil
and gas commission (OGC) was abusing the power to grant
consecutive short-term approvals in lieu of longer licenses
which theoretically require greater environmental review.
Section 8(1) states:
If a diversion or use of water is required for a term
not exceeding 24 months, the comptroller or a regional water
manager may, on application, without issuing a licence, grant an
approval in writing, approving the diversion or use, or both, of
the water on the conditions the comptroller or regional water
manager considers advisable.
The Court pointed out that oil and gas companies "use" less than
1% of all surface water allocated for use in B.C. and that hydro
power is allocated greater than 90% of all such approvals. WCWC,
supra at para. 16. Oil and gas operators typically require water
use for geophysical exploration, drilling, winter road
construction, well drilling and the testing of pipelines, for
example.
Read the full
article by Dianne
Saxe with Saxe Law Office.
Province Releases Progress Report
on Mount Polley Remediation
The first phase of a long-term remediation plan for the area
impacted by the Mount Polley breach focuses on human health and
environmental safety through the winter and spring, to June
2015. A progress report on Mount Polley Mining Corporation's
remediation plan, focusing on Phase One of a longer-term plan,
was released by Environment Minister Mary Polak.
The company has already completed or initiated many components
of Phase One, toward achieving three key outcomes, which will
ensure:
- No further unauthorized discharges into Hazeltine Creek;
- The impact zone will be stabilized to manage seasonal
events; and
- Water quality entering Quesnel Lake and at the outer edge of
the impact zone will meet provincial water quality guidelines.
Deliverables of Phase One of the longer-term plan are contained
in a letter to the company outlining what actions have been
completed to the ministry's satisfaction, and what actions still
need to be taken over the short-term. This letter, along with
the progress report and other supporting documents can be found
online at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/eemp/incidents/2014/mount-polley/updates.htm.
Read the full government
news release.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Hydro and Power Authority Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, section 34 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Vancouver Island Natural Gas Pipeline Act |
Jan. 1/15 |
by 2014 Bill 4, c. 31, section 14 only (in force by Royal
Assent),
Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2), 2014 |
FAMILY
& CHILDREN |
Family and Children
News:
JP Boyd Invites Feedback on Recent Decisions
under the Family Law Act
John-Paul
Boyd, a frequent contributor to Quickscribe, has posted
commentary on cases that may perhaps be, in his view,
incorrectly decided. These opinion-based annotations have been
published adjacent to the appropriate sections of the Family Law Act, including sections
9, 43, 44, 65, 199 and 228. Please feel free to contribute your
thoughts to this discussion via the "reply" function at the
bottom of each annotation.
The Calculation of Child Support: A Basic Guideline
The Federal Child
Support Guidelines provide a framework for the payment of
child support that a parent pays to support a child financially
after a separation or divorce.
What are the Federal Child Support Guidelines?
As stated in Paragraph 1 of the Guidelines, their purpose is:
- To establish a fair standard of support for children that
ensures that they continue to benefit from the financial means
of both spouses after separation;
- To reduce conflict and tension between spouses by making the
calculation of child support orders more objective; The
Federal Child Support Guidelines apply to children of the
marriage who are under the age of majority or who are "the age
of majority or over but [are] unable, by reason of illness,
disability or other cause to obtain the necessities of life."
- To improve the efficiency of the legal process by giving
courts and spouses guidance and encouraging settlement; and,
- To ensure consistent treatment of spouses and children who
are in similar circumstances.
The Federal Child Support Guidelines apply to children
of the marriage who are under the age of majority or who are
"the age of majority or over but [are] unable, by reason of
illness, disability or other cause to obtain the necessities of
life." The Government
of Canada guide suggests that "Generally, the courts
recognize the pursuit of post-secondary education as a valid
'other cause'."
Read the full
article by Mark G. Jones and published on the website Law
Now.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Adult Guardianship Act |
Dec. 1/14 |
by 2007 Bill 29, c. 34, sections 1 (c), (k) (part), 4 (part) and
17 (part) (in force by
Reg 25/2014, repealing
Reg 131/2013, as amended by
Reg 203/2014),
Adult Guardianship and Planning Statutes Amendment Act, 2007,
as amended by 2008 Bill 33, c. 30, section 2 only (in force by
Royal Assent),
Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2008, and 2014 Bill
14, c. 9, sections 1, 3 to 5, 7 and 9 only (in force by
Reg 115/2014),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Statutory Property Guardianship Regulation (115/2014) |
NEW
Dec. 1/14 |
see
Reg 115/2014 as amended by
Reg 203/2014 |
FOREST
& ENVIRONMENT |
Forest
and Environment News:
Range Act Amendments
Changes made to the Range Act and Range
Act regulation to improve the management of
BC's rangeland will come into force [December 1, 2014], Forests,
Lands and Natural Resource Operations Minister Steve Thomson has
announced. The regulatory changes reflect a commitment made in
the BC Jobs Plan and a recommendation of the Ranching Task Force
to improve the regulatory framework for range tenure holders.
The changes to the Range Act regulation:
- streamline the process for approving agreements (permits and
licences) so vacant Crown range can be allocated more quickly
and efficiently;
- simplify the fee structure and eliminate some fees;
- improve business certainty for range operators by allowing
longer terms on tenures, and also allow the conversion of
grazing permits issued prior to 2004 to grazing licences; and
- enable the conversion of grazing leases to grazing licences,
providing tenure holders more flexibility to manage their
businesses.
The changes to the Range Act regulation will also give
licence holders and other agreement holders more freedom to
manage their operations by removing the requirement for
operators to obtain ministry approval before selling their
excess hay production. The changes will also allow a holder of
multiple tenures to more easily consolidate or subdivide those
tenures. Source –
Government of BC
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
A number of Environmental Appeal Board decisions were released
in the month of November. These include the following:
Environmental Management Act
Wildlife Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal website
for more information.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Carbon Neutral Government Regulation (392/2008) |
Jan. 1/15 |
by
Reg 124/2014 |
Logging Tax Act Interest Regulation (53/2003) |
Dec. 1/14 |
by
Reg 207/2014 |
Range Act |
Dec. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 5, c. 7, sections 22, 26 and 34 only (in force by
Reg 223/2014),
Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Statutes
Amendment Act, 2014 |
Range Regulation (116/2005) |
Dec. 1/14 |
by
Reg 223/2014 |
HEALTH |
Seniors Struggle with Drug Costs in BC
Seniors are poorly served by income-based pharmaceutical
coverage, which leads to prescription skipping and higher costs
for hospitalization, according to a new report released
[December 3rd] by the Institute for Research on
Public Policy.
"British Columbians report greater financial barriers to filling
prescriptions than people do in other provinces," said lead
author Steve Morgan, director of the Centre for Heath Services
and Policy Research at the University of BC.
As the proportion of people over the age of 65 began to
accelerate a decade ago, several provinces, including BC, ended
age-based drug coverage that paid virtually all pharmaceutical
costs for seniors.
"Pharmaceutical policy is particularly prone to age-related
financial pressures, not so much on a system as a whole, but on
governments," said Morgan. Read The Vancouver Sun
article.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Hospital District Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, section 32 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Patients Property Act |
Dec. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, sections 30, 31 (part), 32 to 36 only (in
force by
Reg 115/2014 as amended by
Reg 203/2014),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Provider Regulation 222/2014 |
NEW
Dec. 1/14 |
see
Reg 222/2014 |
LABOUR
& EMPLOYMENT |
Labour and Employment News:
Discriminatory to Provide Birth Mothers Same
Amount
of Top-up Benefits as Birth Fathers, Adoptive Parents
In a rare oral judgment that was issued on November 12, 2014
– British
Columbia Teachers' Federation v. British Columbia Public
School Employers' Association, 2014 SCC 70 –
the Supreme Court of Canada overturned a decision by the BC
Court of Appeal and restored the decision of a labour arbitrator
concerning top-up benefits provided to teachers who are new
parents. The labour arbitrator, John B. Hall, had ruled that it
was discriminatory – under section
15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and
section
13 of the BC Human Rights Code – to
provide the same amount of top-up benefits to birth mothers as
birth fathers and adoptive parents. Read the full
article on Greg Gowe's Canadian Workplace Law
website.
Irene Lanzinger, New BC Fed President, Targets
$15/h Minimum Wage
Former Head of the BC Teachers' Federation
Replaces Jim Sinclair as BC's Top Union Leader
Raising British Columbia's minimum wage to $15 per hour is one
of the top goals for the newly-elected president of the BC
Federation of Labour, Irene Lanzinger.
Lanzinger has become the first female to lead the half-a-million
strong labour organization, beating out Amber Hockin by just 57
ballots during voting at the 56th annual convention
in Vancouver on [November 27th]. She replaces Jim
Sinclair who announced in October that he would not seek
re-election after serving 15 years as the president. "We are
seeing a growing gap between rich and poor and a lot of poverty
in British Columbia," said Lanzinger in an interview. Read the
CBC
article.
Employees on Extended Medical Leave
Disability management concepts
An employee leaves work in tears. A doctor's note follows,
stating the employee will be absent two weeks for medical
reasons. Two weeks becomes a month, a month becomes two, and a
year later the employee is still on leave.
The employer now faces a situation that began as a short-term
medical leave, and has become a protracted employee absence
fraught with legal liability.
Employees on extended leaves present legally complicated
situations, and employers should consider the following
approaches to disability management:
Obtain Information and Assess Fitness for Work
An important step in disability management is to understand the
employee's abilities and restrictions as a result of the
illness, and understand whether the employee requires any
accommodations to return to work.
Employers don't need the employee's specific diagnosis. However,
it is important to understand if the employee's illness is
temporary or permanent, how the illness affects the employee's
ability to do the job and whether the illness presents any
safety concerns. Read the full
article by Jonas McKay with the law firm Hamilton Howell
Bain & Gould and published in Bar Talk.
Working Outside the Employment Standards Act:
Variances, Averaging Agreements, and Exclusions
Flexible shift work schedules are a familiar part of large-scale
infrastructure and resource projects in British Columbia. In
those industries, it is common for employees to work for several
weeks, followed by a week off, work 10- or 12-hour shifts, or
work some other nonstandard schedule. However, as more employers
look for ways to lower payroll costs and improve flexibility,
demand for flexible shift scheduling is increasing across many
industries, a trend which is gaining momentum and will continue
for the foreseeable future. The reasons motiving non-standard
work schedules are myriad, but often include time and cost
pressures on employers. For example, market pressures may demand
that a project is complete before price changes make the project
uneconomic. Employers often compete for skilled employees from
out of province, who may prefer the compensation benefits
offered by many consecutive days of work, and longer breaks to
return home. Finally, capital-intensive equipment can be better
utilized when projects are completed quickly, allowing employers
to be more efficient. Read the full
article by Michael
Hamata with Davis LLP.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities
Regulation (265/2002) |
Jan. 1/15 |
by
Reg 226/2014 |
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
Local Government News:
Amendments to the Local Government Act
By way of Bill 17, the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act, the provincial government
adopted several amendments to the Local Government Act on May 29,
2014. These amendments were intended, amongst others, to allow
modern land use policies by phasing out any remaining land use
contracts and to protect developers by "insulating" in-stream
rezoning and development permit applications from increases in
development cost charges.
Phasing Out Land Use Contracts
Many parcels of lands in British Columbia are subject to land
use contracts. Land use contracts were a common planning tool
used by local governments between 1972 and 1977. These were
contractual agreements between the land owner and a local
government that established the specific use and development
restrictions on parcels of land. The land use contracts were
filed in the Land Title Office. The provisions of the land use
contract superseded the relevant zoning bylaw as well as other
land use bylaws. They were in many ways an early type of site
specific or comprehensive development zoning. Often the effect
of the land use contract was to preserve the zoning that was in
place at the date the land use contract was entered into. Read
the full
article by Edward
Wilson and Stephanie
Redding with Lawson Lundell LLP.
2014 Edition of Guide for Municipal Council
Members and Regional Directors – SMS
The 2014 edition of the Guide for Municipal Council Members and
Regional District Directors was recently published on the
Stewart McDannold Stuart website. Please click here
to view the new Guide.
BC Communities Receive Grants-in-Lieu
of Property Taxes
[On November 14, 2014] the BC government will [begin]
distributing approximately $17.1 million in compensation for
municipal property taxes to 59 communities throughout the
province.
Grants-in-lieu of property taxes are distributed every November
to reimburse municipalities for services that benefited
government properties, such as municipally run sewers, roads and
fire protection.
Grants are issued in accordance with the Municipal Aid Act and are payable
on land owned by the provincial government such as courthouses,
provincial government office buildings and warehouses. Schools
and hospitals are exempt from paying municipal property taxes
and are not part of the grant-in-lieu calculation. Other
provincial assets such as highways, forests, parks or land under
the control, management or administration of a Crown corporation
are also excluded from compensation under the Act. BC Emergency
Health Services is responsible for grants-in-lieu payments for
ambulance stations. Read the full government
news release.
"What is this Zoning Worth to You?":
British Columbia's Attempt to Control
Voluntary Amenity Contributions
In March 2014, British Columbia's Ministry of Community Sport
and Cultural Development issued a set of guidelines relating to
local governments taking amenity contributions (the
"Guidelines"). The Guidelines are entitled "Community Amenity
Contributions: Balancing Community Planning, Public Benefits and
Housing Affordability." They address the practice whereby local
governments require community amenity contributions ("CACs")
– such as payments towards or for childcare facilities,
social housing, community facilities and the like – from
owners and developers applying to change land use bylaws.
In British Columbia, local governments do not have express
authority to require CACs. However, many local governments and
developers negotiate these at or as a condition of zoning.
The Guidelines set out the Province's position on CACs. The
Province cautions local governments that CACs have no legal
basis and cites CACs as a possible cause of rising housing
prices. Despite this caution, the Province condones the practice
and sets out the "dos" and the "don'ts" of CACs: flexibility and
proportionality on the one hand, and not creating the semblance
of "selling zoning" on the other.
This article by Olga
Rivkin with Bull Housser LLP will examine the practice of
negotiating CACs and the Guidelines, and will speculate whether
the Guidelines – an informal policy guiding an informal
practice – are likely to change the status quo. Read the
full article.
A Sigh of Relief for Elected Officials – BC Supreme
Court
Accepts Defence of Honesty and Good Faith in Claim
for Personal Liability – by Colin Stewart
In the recent BC Supreme Court decision Orchiston
v. Formosa, 2014 BCSC 1080, the BC Supreme Court has
ruled on the interpretation to be given to section
191 of the Community Charter and, in
particular, has considered defences available to local
government elected officials who may be found to have authorized
the expenditure of money without lawful authority.
Background
The background of the case was a loan made by the municipality
to a development corporation known as the Powell River
Waterfront Development Corporation (the "Corporation") of which
the City was the sole shareholder. The City had sought and
obtained legal advice that such a shareholder loan to the
Corporation would be lawful. The respondents were elected to
Powell River Council after the shareholders loan had been made
but relying upon the earlier opinion, the City granted a further
loan approved by Council in the amount of $12,000.00.
These loans were eventually repaid by the Corporation shortly
after the municipality entered into a partnering agreement with
the Corporation under section
21 of the Community Charter. Read the full
article by Colin Stewart with Stewart McDannold
Stuart.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Assessment Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, sections 7 to 21 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Assessment Authority Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, sections 22 to 25 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
British Columbia Building Code Regulation (264/2012) |
Dec. 19/14 |
by
Regs 173/2013,
140/2014 and
175/2014 |
Home Owner Grant Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, section 31 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Medical and Health Care Services Regulation (426/97) |
Jan. 1/15 |
by
Reg 144/2014 |
Municipalities Enabling and Validating Act (No. 4) |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, section 43 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Tourist Accommodation (Assessment Relief) Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, section 59 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Miscellaneous News:
Expect Canada's Anti-Spam Law Could Face
Charter Challenge, Law Professor Says
We'll remember 2014 as the year we all received that unsolicited
email asking us if we would consent to receive more unsolicited
email.
It was laughable – spam asking for permission to send you
spam. But next year, things might get more serious. At least one
law professor thinks 2015 could be the year section
13 of the BC Canada's Anti-Spam Law (CASL) faces a
constitutional challenge.
Emir Crowne, a law professor at the University of Windsor and
Stephanie Provato, a law student who expects to receive her
degree in 2015, have jointly authored an academic
paper for the John Marshall Journal of Information
Technology & Privacy Law that argues Canada's federal
anti-spam legislation creates unconstitutional limits on free
speech. They say that the law violates the freedom of expression
guarantees in section
2(b) of the Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, and that those violations are too broad to
be saved as a justifiable limit under section 1.
"It's a tough Act to defend from a Charter perspective," Mr.
Crowne said in an interview. He's not aware of anyone filing an
immediate challenge in court. But he says the maximum
administrative monetary penalties or "AMPs" imposed by the law
– $1-million for individuals and $10-million for
corporations – are high enough to inspire anyone charged
under the Act to raise the constitutional issue as a defence.
Read the article
by Drew Hasselback and published in the Financial Post.
Ian Mulgrew: Lawyers Sue Province over Civil
Jury Fees
Costs present a barrier to justice by making
process unaffordable, group maintains
Charging would-be litigants up front for the cost of a civil
jury is unconstitutional and represents a barrier to civil
justice, the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C. says in a lawsuit
against the provincial government.
The sheriff's levies are unaffordable not just by the indigent
and needy, but also by large segments of the middle class, the
group maintains.
"The right to Canadians to pursue or defend a civil claim before
a civil jury enhances the achievement of justice, serves the
public interest and is an essential aspect of the Canadian civil
justice system," the trial lawyers say.
The B.C. Supreme Court rules state a litigant must pay to the
sheriff a sum sufficient to cover the costs for the jury and the
jury process.
In a statement of claim filed with the court [December 2nd],
the lawyers say not only do the hefty fees deter anyone who
isn't wealthy, but also they have not been authorized by an
order-in-council under the Jury Act or any other statute.
Read The Vancouver Sun
article.
Changes to Dangerous-Offender Scheme
Violates Charter, BC Court Rules
A British Columbia judge has ruled the Conservative government's
six-year-old changes to the dangerous-offender regime violate
the charter, but it's not yet clear whether the law will be
struck down.
The B.C. Supreme Court ruling involves the case of Donald
Boutilier, who pleaded guilty in May 2012 to a number of
offences including assault and robbery. The Crown asked that he
be declared a dangerous offender, which carries the possibility
of an indeterminate sentence.
His lawyer challenged the law, arguing changes put into place in
2008 under an omnibus crime bill violate Boutilier's charter
rights because they removed the judges' discretion over
declaring someone a dangerous offender.
Judge Peter Voith said the changes mean some offenders could be
labelled dangerous regardless of whether they actually pose a
risk to the public.
"A dangerous-offender designation, absent consideration of the
treatment prospects for an offender, serves to permanently label
an offender as dangerous when there may be 'clear evidence' that
the offender, with treatment, does not pose a risk or poses a
limited risk to the public," Voith said in a written decision.
A hearing is scheduled in the new year to determine what will
happen to the law. Read the entire article
published in The Province.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Nisga'a Final Agreement Act |
Dec. 4/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, section 4 (part) only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, sections 1 to 4 (part), 5 only (in force
by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
Police Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, sections 1 to 4 (part), 5 only (in force
by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
MOTOR
VEHICLE & TRAFFIC |
Motor
Vehicle and Traffic News:
CVSE – National Safety Code Bulletin
Re: Maintenance of Records
– Motor Vehicle Act Regulations 37.29 (1)
Section
37.29 of the Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (MVAR)
requires the carrier to maintain their records at its
principal place of business in the Province. Any other
location must be approved by the director of Commercial
Vehicle Safety and Enforcement (CVSE). The definition for the
"principal place of business" is the place identified in
writing by the carrier to the director, and approved by the
director, where daily logs, supporting documents and records
required to be maintained by MVAR 37.29 are kept by the
carrier. The maintenance of records at a consultants' location
does not meet the definition of the carriers' "principal place
of business" unless approved by the director. Consequently,
consultants that are retaining client records are advised to
return all records to their clients immediately or have the
carrier submit a written request to the NSC Program Office.
View the entire Bulletin here
published on the CVSE website.
Off-Road Vehicle Registration
Launched for BC
New rules are voluntary, but
will become mandatory in June
New rules came into in effect on Monday
[November 17th] for off-road vehicles in BC,
including a new registration system for all ATVs, snowmobiles,
and dirt bikes.
Owners have to pay a one-time fee of $48 to register their
vehicles with ICBC. All vehicles will require a license plate
or a decal and will be added to a province-wide database.
For now the registration is voluntary, but beginning in June,
it will be mandatory.
Future regulations will be used to regulate rules of
operation, including safety standards, penalties and
conditions of use.
Erin Hart, the President of the B.C. Snowmobile Federation,
says the new system will cut down on off-road vehicle theft.
Read CBC article.
Mounties Won't Be Charged
in High-Speed Chase
BC's criminal justice branch has opted not to charge two RCMP
officers who were involved in a high-speed chase between
Fernie and Sparwood in southeastern BC earlier this year.
The SUV the officers were chasing in the early morning hours
of January 16 slammed into another vehicle, injuring the
passengers inside.
When the chase and subsequent arrest were investigated by the
Independent Investigations Office, a report was submitted for
charge assessment that indicated the officers may have
committed an offence.
A statement from the Criminal Justice Branch released
[November 19] says there's no substantial likelihood of
conviction for any driving offences against the officers
either under the Criminal Code
or under the provincial Motor Vehicle Act.
Read the
full article published in The Province.
Slow Down Move Over Regulation
Protects Roadside Workers
The BC government is making a Motor Vehicle Act regulation
change to simplify the Slow Down Move Over rule, making
it safer for roadside workers.
Currently, the Slow Down Move Over regulation requires drivers
to reduce speed and, if on a multi-lane road, move over to
another lane when passing stopped vehicles with a flashing
light, which are considered "official vehicles". These
include: police, fire, ambulance, tow trucks, Commercial
Vehicle Safety Enforcement vehicles, park rangers and
conservation officers.
Stakeholders, including the BC Road Builders and Heavy
Construction Association, raised concerns that the current
regulation does not protect all roadside workers. For example,
maintenance workers are frequently required to stop on the
side of the road for inspections or highway maintenance. These
workers are subject to an equal or higher risk than many of
the workers covered under the current regulations. The change
is expected to come into force on January 1, 2015. Read the
government news
release.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (26/58) |
Jan. 1/15 |
by
Reg 227/2014 |
Motor Vehicle Fees Regulation (334/91) |
Dec. 1/14 |
by
Reg 260/2013 |
South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Act |
Jan. 1/15 |
by 2014 Bill 22, c. 21, section 12 only (in force by Reg
131/2014),
South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Amendment
Act, 2014 |
PROPERTY
& REAL ESTATE |
Property and Real
Estate News:
Termination of Land Use Contracts
Changes have recently been introduced to the laws
surrounding Land Use Contracts ("LUCs") that could materially
affect the right of a land owner to use his land that is
presently subject to a LUC.
LUCs are contractual agreements between property owners and a
local government which were used in BC throughout the 1970s to
negotiate the terms and conditions of subdivisions and
developments, as well as use of the lands after subdivision and
development, within a municipality. LUCs describe the uses
permitted on the lands including, amongst other things, the
regulations for siting of buildings, the use of parks,
landscaping requirements, parking, off-site infrastructure
development and development fees.
New LUCs have not been created since the late 1970s. However,
LUCs that were negotiated during the 1970s are effective today
if they remain registered on title to lands affected. The
greatest advantage of a LUC remains that the terms and
conditions within the LUC supersede regulations and bylaws,
including zoning bylaws, enacted by a local government after the
LUC was negotiated. This is often advantageous for developers in
areas that currently have more restrictive zoning bylaws. Read
the full
article by Bradley
Cronquist with Pushor Mitchell LLP.
CRT Launches Website
The Civil Resolution Tribunal recently launched its website
in preparation to the official CRT opening in 2015. The CRT's
mandate is to offer the public a choice about how, when, and
where one can resolve small claims and strata property
(condominium) disputes. The site offers information about the
implementation of CRT and includes a FAQ's, updates and other
related information.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Manufactured Home Tax Act |
Dec. 31/14 |
by 2014 Bill 7, c. 32, sections 39 to 41 only (in force by
Reg 228/2014),
Nisga'a Final Agreement Amendment Act, 2014 |
WILLS
& ESTATES |
Wills and Estates News:
Adult Guardianship Act Changes –
Now In Force!
New rules being brought into force [December 1, 2014] represent
a significant step forward in modernizing BC's adult
guardianship system. The changes will strengthen the rights of
adults who may be unable to make financial decisions
independently due to mental incapability and, as a result, may
require the assistance of a statutory property guardian.
Changes are being made to the Adult Guardianship Act that relate
to the certificate of incapability process. Related regulations,
which include procedures for conducting assessments of
incapability to manage financial affairs, are also coming into
force. A certificate of incapability is determined through an
out-of-court process by which the Public Guardian and Trustee
(PGT) becomes responsible for the management of the financial
affairs of incapable adults (also called statutory property
guardianship).
Milne Estate v. Milne
Separation Agreements or court orders following marriage
breakdown may include a clause requiring one former spouse to
maintain a life insurance policy on his or her life, naming the
other as the beneficiary. Life insurance is a good way to either
secure spousal or child support payments, or to replace the
payments, in case the former spouse required to pay support
dies. But what happens if, contrary to the agreement or court
order, the party required to maintain the life insurance cancels
the policy or changes the beneficiary?
The Supreme Court of British Columbia recently considered this
issue in Milne
Estate v. Milne, 2014 BCSC 2112. Following the
breakdown of their relationship, Scott Milne agreed to maintain
his $500,000 life insurance with Sherry Milne as the beneficiary
for so long as he was required to pay child or spousal support
to Ms. Milne. Mr. and Ms. Milne agreed to include this term in a
consent court order. In breach of the order, Mr. Milne changed
the beneficiary to his new partner, Albertina Vincente. Mr.
Milne died on August 4, 2013, while still obligated to pay child
support to Ms. Milne for their son.
Ms. Milne claimed that she was entitled to the insurance
proceeds because Mr. Milne was in breach of the consent order.
If she wasn't entitled to the proceeds, then she claimed that
she was entitled to the $500,000 she would have received if Mr.
Milne had not changed the beneficiary out of his estate. Read
the full
article by Stan
Rule on his blog Rule of Law.
Curing Deficiencies in Wills –
Contrasting
British Columbia and Alberta
The following article was published by Mark
Weintraub with Clark
Wilson:
In previous blog posts dated February
28 and May
27, we suggested that when the Wills, Estates and Succession Act
("WESA") came into force, the legal landscape had changed
and interesting court cases would follow. One such change to the
landscape is section
58 of WESA, which allows the Court to cure
deficiencies in Wills. If a document does not comply with the
formal requirements for a Will, it may nonetheless be declared
to have the legal effect of a valid Will. To date, there have
not been any British Columbia cases decided under section 58.
Before WESA came into force, Alberta's updated wills and
estates legislation came into force. It contains a similar (but
not the same) provision to section 58 of WESA. A recent
Alberta decision set out how the Alberta legislation is to be
interpreted. The decision serves as a contrast to how we predict
the Court will interpret the British Columbia legislation. Read
the full
article.
|
Act
or
Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment
Information |
Adult Guardianship Act |
Dec. 1/14 |
by 2007 Bill 29, c. 34, sections 1 (c), (k) (part), 4 (part) and
17 (part) (in force by
Reg 25/2014, repealing
Reg 131/2013, as amended by
Reg 203/2014),
Adult Guardianship and Planning Statutes Amendment Act, 2007,
as amended by 2008 Bill 33, c. 30, section 2 only (in force by
Royal Assent),
Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2008, and 2014 Bill
14, c. 9, sections 1, 3 to 5, 7 and 9 only (in force by
Reg 115/2014),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Power of Attorney Act |
Dec. 1/14 |
by 2014 Bill 14, c. 9, section 43 only (in force by
Reg 115/2014),
Justice Statutes Amendment Act, 2014 |
Statutory Property Guardianship Regulation (115/2014) |
NEW
Dec. 1/14 |
see
Reg 115/2014 |
The
content
of this document is intended
for client use only. Redistribution to anyone other than
Quickscribe
clients
(without the prior written consent of Quickscribe) is strictly
prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD.
UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE
To unsubscribe from this service, click here. |