COMPANY & FINANCE |
Company and Finance News:
New Transparency Requirements: Private Companies in
British Columbia
Now Required to Collect and Disclose Shareholder Information
On May 16, 2019, Bill 24 the Business Corporations
Amendment Act, 2019 (the "Bill") received Royal Assent.
The Bill requires private companies recognized under the laws
of British Columbia to create a "transparency register". The
Government intends for the transparency register to help
mitigate criminal activity, such as tax evasion and money
laundering, by requiring private companies to maintain detailed
information about certain shareholders. Read the full article by Sandra M. Knowler and
Joanna Dawson with McMillan LLP.
BCFSA: Changing BC's Regulatory Framework for
Financial Institutions
On November 20, 2019, the Legislative Assembly of British
Columbia passed the third reading of the newly introduced Bill 37, the Financial Institutions
Amendment Act, 2019 (Bill 37), which received royal
assent on November 28, 2019. The purpose of Bill 37 is to
modernize the legislative framework, enhance consumer
protections and help maintain public confidence in BC's
financial institutions. Bill 37 makes significant changes in
the operations of credit unions, insurance companies and
intermediaries and trust companies.
On November 1, 2019, certain Financial Services Authority Act
provisions came into force, which gave the BC Financial
Services Authority (the BCFSA) powers over the Financial Institutions Act, Credit Union Incorporation Act,
Insurance Act, Insurance (Captive Company) Act,
Mortgage Brokers Act, and Pension Benefits Standards Act.
Essentially, the BCFSA has replaced the Financial Institutions
Commission (FICOM) as the province's financial institution
regulator. The changes in Bill 37 are a part of this shift to
the new regulator in British Columbia. Read the full article by Ross McGowan and Jason Uswak with Borden Ladner
Gervais.
BC Ministry of Finance Consulting on Reverse Mortgages
as
Part of its Review of the Mortgage Brokers Act
In January, the Ministry of Finance for British Columbia
opened a public consultation on reforms to the Mortgage Brokers Act. As the
ministry's discussion paper (PDF) noted:
The Mortgage Brokers Act (MBA) was originally enacted in
1972 as consumer protection legislation in response to an
increased number of mortgage brokers and complaints of
gross and unconscionable interest rates and fees. At the
time, mortgage brokers were considered the lenders of last
resort; however, over the years the industry has changed
and has become part of the mainstream financial market.
Although it has been amended several times since its
enactment, the MBA has not kept pace with evolving national
and international standards in consumer protection, changes
in the financial services market and emerging issues such
as money laundering in the real estate market.
Read the full article by Kevin Zakreski with the
British Columbia Law Institute.
BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were published on the
BCSC website in the month of February:
- 23-326 – CSA Staff Notice
23-326 Order Protection Rule: Market Share
Threshold for the period April 1, 2020 to March 31,
2021
- 52-112 – CSA Second Notice and
Request for Comment Proposed National Instrument 52-112
Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures Disclosure, Proposed
Companion Policy 52-112 Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures
Disclosure and Related Proposed Consequential Amendments and
Changes
- 81-105 – Multilateral CSA Notice
of Amendments to National Instrument 81-1-5 Mutual Fund Sales
Practices, Changes to Companion Policy 81-105CP to National
Instrument 81-105 Mutual Fund Sales Practices and
Changes to Companion Policy 81-101CP to National Instrument
81-101 Mutual Fund Prospectus Disclosure relating to
Prohibition of Deferred Sales Charges for Investment Funds
- 45-110 – CSA Notice and Request
for Comment – Proposed National Instrument 45-110
Start-up Crowdfunding Registration and Prospectus Exemptions
- BC Notice 2020/03 – Notice of
Amendments to the Securities Act [This Notice summarizes
amendments to the Securities Act arising from Bill 33, the
Securities Amendment Act, 2019 (the Act amendments), which
received Royal Assent on November 28, 2019.]
For more information visit the BC Securities website.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax
Regulation (93/2013) |
Feb. 1/20 |
by Reg 139/2019 |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 41/2020 |
Mar. 1/20 |
by Reg 275/2019 |
ENERGY & MINES |
Energy and Mines News:
The Continued Rise of Environmental, Social and
Governance
Policies in the Current Energy Transition
Industry participants may have taken note of the news earlier
this month that Québec's main natural gas distributor,
Énergir, entered into a responsible natural gas supply
agreement with Alberta-based Seven Generations Energy to
purchase roughly 10% of Seven Generations gas production. The
deal is the first of its kind under the EO100 Standard for
Responsible Energy Development, an independent certification
for assessing environmental, social and governance (commonly
referred to as "ESG") standards. This partnership is part of a
broader initiative by Énergir for the responsible
procurement of natural gas, developed in collaboration with the
Pembina Institute. Énergir, which has also been an
active proponent of Renewable Natural Gas development, plans to
obtain nearly 20% of its natural gas supply from similarly
certified producers in the first year of the initiative. Read
the full article by Lorne Rollheiser with
Gowling WLG.
Carbon Pricing: What's the Matter?
The Supreme Court will have its work cut out for it in an area
of constitutional law that has been rarely tested, as it
prepares for the upcoming hearing on the national carbon
pricing scheme. Heading into the big game, there's some
disagreement about the score. Some say it's 2-1. Others say
it's a more drawn-out 8-7. Whichever it is, it's heading to the
Supreme Court. That's roughly the state of play after the
Alberta Court of Appeal handed down its opinion on the federal
carbon pricing scheme last month. In doing so, it defied most
expectations. While two other appeals courts, in Ontario and
Saskatchewan, had found Ottawa's carbon price to be
constitutional, both had grappled with the applicability of the
federal government's authority to legislate and regulate
matters that could touch provincial jurisdiction. They also
found, for a myriad of reasons, that limiting CO2
emissions, in line with Canada's international obligations,
fell under the "national concern branch" of its constitutional
power to govern peace, order, and good government (POGG). Read
the full article by Justin Ling and published in the CBA
National.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Act |
Feb. 27/20 |
by 2014 Bill 12, c. 10, sections 25, 30 (b) and 37 (a) (part)
(in force by Reg 33/2020) Natural Gas Development Statutes Amendment Act,
2014 |
by 2018 Bill 15, c. 15, sections 25, 26 and 28 (part) (in force
by Reg 33/2020), Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Statutes
Amendment Act, 2018 |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Act Fee, Rental and Work Requirement
Regulation (378/82) |
Feb. 27/20 |
by Reg 33/2020 |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Drilling Licence and Lease Regulation
(10/82) |
Feb. 27/20 |
by Reg 33/2020 |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Grid Regulation (536/2004) |
Feb. 27/20 |
by Reg 33/2020 |
Petroleum and Natural Gas General Regulation (357/98) |
Feb. 27/20 |
by Reg 33/2020 |
FAMILY
& CHILDREN |
Family and Children News:
A Brief Overview of Bill 7, the Arbitration Act
for
Family Law Professionals
British Columbia Bill 7 [Arbitration Act] affects
two provincial statutes, the Arbitration Act and Family Law Act, and introduces a
minor consequential amendment to the Family Maintenance Enforcement Act.
The bill will repeal and replace the current Arbitration
Act, and re-establish that act as a vehicle for
commercial arbitrations alone while introducing specific
provisions for the arbitration of family law disputes to the Family
Law Act.
The bill was tabled in the legislature for first reading on 19
February 2020. Although no timetable has been fixed for second
reading, the committee stage, third readying and royal assent,
it seems likely that the bill will become law sometime around
mid-summer 2020, coincident with the coming into force of the
amendments to the Divorce Act. Read the full article by John-Paul E Boyd, QC, John-Paul Boyd
Arbitration Chambers.
New Practice Direction: Sealing Orders in
Civil and Family Proceedings
Effective February 10, 2020
This Practice Direction sets out the procedure for applying for
an order sealing all or part of the court file in a civil or
family law case. The Practice Direction requires that at the
hearing of an application for a sealing order, the applicant
must provide to the Court a draft sealing order in the form
attached as Schedule A. This Practice Direction does not
address the jurisdiction to grant a sealing order and pertains
only to the process for application. The Practice Direction
does not derogate from the limitations on access to court files
that are provided by enactments, the Supreme Court Civil Rules and the Supreme Court Family Rules. View the full
document at BC Courts.
Proposed Amendments to the Family Law Act, Family
Maintenance
Enforcement Act and Interjurisdictional Support
Orders Act
On February 27, 2020, the government introduced the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act (Bill 13). According to the government,
the proposed amendments will lead to better assistance for
British Columbia families by enabling family justice
counsellors (Family Justice Services Division), search officers
(Locate Services), and enforcement officers (Family Maintenance
Enforcement Program) to obtain the information they need within
the framework of the Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act. For example, amendments would clarify
that parents who are receiving assistance from a family justice
counsellor can share information, such as names and addresses,
about other family members with the counsellor. Amendments also
clarify that an enforcement officer with the Family Maintenance
Enforcement Program may request the social insurance number of
a debtor with significant arrears of child or spousal support
to verify the debtor's identity to enforce a support order.
Limiting the Generality of the Foregoing
Since the Family Law Act, S.B.C. 2011, c.
25 ("FLA") came into force in 2013, the courts have grappled
with the meaning of "significantly unfair" in the context of
reapportionment claims. In BC, separating spouses may be
entitled to a greater portion of family property, if they can
prove that it would be "significantly unfair" to divide the
family's property equally.
The important takeaway from a recent BC Court of Appeal case,
Singh v. Singh, 2020 BCCA 21, is that the "catch all"
provision in s. 95(2)(i) of the FLA, does not really
mean "any other factor" that leads to a finding of significant
unfairness. Section 95(2)(i) is limited to
factors that relate to the economic characteristics of a
spousal relationship. This includes, for example,
bankruptcy, undisclosed assets, and other economic or financial
factors arising from a separation. However, the question
remains: how broadly can the court now interpret the meaning of
"economic" factors? Read the full article by Jeanette Aucoin with
Clark Wilson LLP.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Supreme Court Civil Rules (168/2019) |
Feb. 1/20 |
by Reg 18/2019 |
FOREST
& ENVIRONMENT |
Forest and Environment News:
EMA – Proposed Amendments
On February 18, 2020, the government introduced Bill 3, Environmental Management
Amendment Act, 2020, According to the government, this
bill proposes a series of amendments to the Environmental Management Act to
enhance the oversight of soil relocation in the province for
the better protection of human health and the environment. If
passed, the new legislation will prohibit a person from
removing soil from a site that has been used for a specified
industrial or commercial use unless the person has analyzed the
soil and provided notification of the removal through a new
system to track soil movement throughout the province.
Water Sustainability Act – Proposed
Amendments
On February 27, 2020, the government introduced the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act (Bill 13). The Bill amends several laws
including the Water Sustainability Act. The Water
Sustainability Act governs the allocation and regulation
of the diversion, use and storage of water from streams and
groundwater in BC. According to the government, the amendments
are intended to make administrative corrections and provide
more authority for government to collect, use and disclose the
personal information of water users to ensure authorization
holders, applicants, emergency responders and the public have
continued access to the information needed to manage water use
in BC.
BC Approves Transfer of Canfor's Vavenby
Forest Tenure to Interfor
BC Forest Minister Doug Donaldson announced Friday [Feb 28] the
provincial government has consented to the transfer of Canfor's
Vavenby forest tenure to Interfor for $60 million. Canfor
announced the agreement to sell the Vavenby tenure in June last
year, along with the closure of its Vavenby sawmill. The
tenure includes Tree Farm Licence (TFL) 18 and replaceable
forest licence A18688, located in the Kamloops Timber Supply
Area near Vavenby, BC. The two licences have a combined
allowable annual cut of approximately 349,000 cubic metres per
year. Read the full article by Maria Church published by
Canadian Forest Industries.
Canada's Carbon Tax Laws: Where Are We Now?
On June 21, 2018, Canada's Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act
(the Act) came into effect. Part 1 of the Act imposes a
surcharge on fuels such as gasoline, fuel oil, propane,
kerosene and methanol. Distributors of the fuel pay the
surcharge though the cost would likely be passed down to
consumers. Part 2 of the Act applies to large industrial
facilities that emit greenhouse gases (GHG). Facilities have a
limit on the amount of GHG they can emit each year. If they go
over that limit, they must pay through a credit system or an
excess emissions charge or both. Government and media have
affectionately referred to these fees as a carbon tax.
But here's the kicker – Part 1 or Part 2 or both only
apply to provinces that do not have a scheme that is acceptable
to Canada. That is, the provinces can create their own carbon
tax scheme but it must meet Canada's goals. If a province does
not have an acceptable scheme (or no scheme) in place, then the
federal Act kicks in as a backstop. Read the full article by Jessica Steingard and published on LawNow.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
There were two Environmental Appeal Board decision in the month
of February:
Environmental Management Act
Wildlife Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website
for more information.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Administrative Penalties Regulation (Environmental Management
Act) (133/2014) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 7/2019 |
Code of Practice for Agricultural Environment
Management (8/2019) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 8/2019 |
Code of Practice for Soil Amendments (210/2007) |
Feb. 20/20 |
by Reg 28/2020 |
Forest Recreation Regulation (16/2004) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 37/2020 |
Hunting Regulation (190/84) |
Feb. 21/20 |
by Reg 30/2020 |
Limited Entry Hunting Regulation (134/93) |
Feb. 21/20 |
by Reg 30/2020 |
Metal Dealers and Recyclers Regulation (101/2012) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 39/2020 |
Wildlife Act General Regulation (340/82) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 42/2020 |
HEALTH |
Health News:
Pharmaceutical Services Act and E-Health Act –
Proposed Amendments
On February 27, 2020, the government introduced the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act (Bill 13). The Bill amends several laws
including some minor amendments to the Pharmaceutical Services Act and
E-Health Act. According to the government
these proposed minor amendments will bring legislation in line
with recent changes to the Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act, which were required to keep pace with
current technology, such as cloud-based services.
Minister's Statement on Illicit
Drug Toxicity Death Report
On Feb. 24, 2020, the BC Coroners Service announced its 2019
Data Release for Illicit Drug Toxicity Deaths in British
Columbia, reporting that last year, 981 people died due to a
poisoned, unregulated drug supply. The number of deaths is down
36% from the year before. Judy Darcy, Minister of Mental Health
and Addictions, has released the following statement:
"Today's release by the BC Coroners Service of the 2019 drug
toxicity deaths is a sharp reminder of lives cut too short, and
of devastated families and communities left behind in the wake
of this collective tragedy. We mourn each and every person
lost, not as a number but as a person whose life matters. No
one should have to experience the pain of losing a loved one to
the ongoing fentanyl-poisoning crisis." Read the full
government news release.
"Working in a pressure cooker": Violence against
BC Nurses Linked to Heavy Workload
UBC study finds nurses report being verbally assaulted, which
includes yelling, swearing and racial slurs, as well as abuse
ranging from throwing food or bed pans to sexual and physical
assault The heavy workload faced by BC nurses put them at
higher risk of experiencing violence at the hands of their
patients, according to new research from the University of BC.
The study, published in the journal Nursing Open and
funded by the BC Nurses Union, "validates" anecdotal evidence
from nurses on the front lines of the health care system, BCNU
president Christine Sorensen said Thursday [Feb 19].
"Nurses are working in a pressure cooker," she said. "That
pressure in the system transfers to patients … which can
sometimes lead them to take it out on the first person who
helps them." According to the union, 26 nurses each month
suffer a violent injury at work, accounting for 31 per cent of
all injuries from acts of violence in BC. Read the Vancouver
Sun article.
Proposed Changes to Criminal Code Provisions
for
Medical Assistance in Dying will Expand Access
The federal government has announced proposed changes to the Criminal Code's provisions on
medical assistance in dying (MAID) that will expand access for
Canadians.
Two significant changes proposed in "An Act to amend the
Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)" are that the
reasonable foreseeability of natural death criterion has been
repealed, and eligibility for individuals suffering solely from
mental illness has been excluded. Read the full article by Elizabeth Raymer and published in the Canadian
Lawyer Magazine.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Dental Hygienists Regulation (276/2008) |
Feb. 24/20 |
by Reg 32/2020 |
Dental Technicians Regulation (32/2020) |
NEW
Feb. 24/20 |
see Reg 32/2020 |
Dental Technicians Regulation (278/2008) |
REPEALED
Feb. 24/20 |
by Reg 32/2020 |
Dentists Regulation (415/2008) |
Feb. 24/20 |
by Reg 32/2020 |
Denturists Regulation (277/2008) |
Feb. 24/20 |
by Reg 32/2020 |
LABOUR
& EMPLOYMENT |
Labour and Employment News:
Proposed Amendments to the Labour Mobility Act
On February 27, 2020, the government introduced the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act (Bill 13). The Bill amends several laws
including the Labour Mobility Act. According
to the government, proposed amendments will correct out-of-date
references to the Agreement on Internal Trade, which was
replaced with the Canadian Free Trade Agreement in July 2017.
As a result of its reference to the Agreement on Internal
Trade, some portions of the Labour Mobility Act
ceased to have legal effect when the Canadian Free Trade
Agreement was implemented. The proposed amendments will update
the act with the necessary references to the Canadian Free
Trade Agreement, restoring the act's original effect
retroactive to July 2017.
Canada Labour Code Requirements for Annual
Workplace
Inspection only Apply to Employer-Controlled Work Areas
Factual Background
The Supreme Court of Canada, in its long-awaited decision
rendered in Canada Post Corp. v. Canadian Union of Postal
Workers, has recently confirmed that specific provisions
of the Canada Labour Code ("CLC")
regarding inspection of a workplace, for health and safety
purposes, only extend to that part of the workplace over which
an employer has physical control.
In this case, a complaint was filed with Human Resources and
Skills Development Canada, by a representative of the union who
sat on the Local Joint Health and Safety Committee (the
"Committee") at the Burlington Depot, in Ontario.
The complaint claimed that Canada Post Corp ("Canada Post")
failed to comply with its obligations under section 125(1)(z.12) of the CLC by
limiting its annual workplace inspections to the Burlington
Depot only. The complaint stated that such inspections should
not be limited to the Burlington Depot, but should also cover
all letter carrier routes and locations where mail was being
delivered. Read the full article by Olivier Lamoureux with
Gowling WLG.
ESA Amendments – Paid Leave for
Victims of Domestic Violence
On Tuesday, March 3rd, the government introduced Bill 5, Employment Standards
Amendment Act, 2020, that if passed, will entitle
employees to paid leave in relation to domestic or sexual
violence. Currently, employees who have experienced domestic or
sexual violence may take up to 10 non-consecutive days and 15
consecutive weeks (with employers consent) of unpaid,
job-protected leave. The new legislation will allow up to
five-non-consecutive days of paid leave, five non-consecutive
unpaid days and 15 additional unpaid weeks.
Employers at Risk When No Consideration
Is Given for Contractual Terms
The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently provided guidance
on what employers must do if they want to rely on revised
contractual terms. Fresh consideration is necessary. The
employee in Quach v. Mitrux Services Ltd., 2020 BCCA 25, was terminated before he
started work, but after he had left a secure position to work
for this employer. The relationship between the parties started
with an email offer of a fixed term period of employment. The
relationship was finalized by a fixed term contract that was
signed by the parties. One month later, prior to the employee
starting work, the employer presented the employee with a month
to month employment contract, indicating that the employee had
to sign the contract if he wanted to start work. The terms of
the month to month contract were much more favorable to the
employer than the employee. The employee was given no choice
and signed the new agreement. The employer then changed its
mind and did not have the employee start work. Shortly after
the repudiation of the contract the employee obtained
alternative employment. The employee sued under the fixed term
contract alleging that there was no consideration for the month
to month contract of employment. The employer alleged that the
consideration was a promised but unpaid $1,000 reimbursement of
legal fees incurred to prepare the fixed term contract. Read
the full article by Rose Keith with Harper
Grey LLP.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Employment and Assistance Regulation (263/2002) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 35/2020 |
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities
Regulation (263/2002) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 35/2020 |
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
Local Government News:
New Proposed Changes to Local Gov't Act, Community
Charter and Other Related Laws
On February 24th, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
introduced Bill 10 – 2020, Municipal
Affairs and Housing Statutes Amendment Act. According to
the Minister: "The purpose of the proposed legislation is to
create the interim business property tax relief program, which
will enable municipalities to provide immediate tax relief to
the small businesses, non-profits and arts and culture
organizations that have, for many years, been bearing the brunt
of an out-of-control real estate market. This legislation
provides significant flexibility that will allow local
governments to tailor their bylaws to the needs of their
communities, because we know that the extent of this problem
and the way it is affecting the local community looks very
different in Squamish, Victoria or Vancouver." "This bill
contains four other items proposing minor amendments to the Assessment Act, the Local Government Act, the Community Charter and the Vancouver Charter. These
amendments align BC Assessment's fiscal year with that of the
government and all other Crown corporations, repeal the
commercial vehicle licence program, raise maximum fines for
bylaw contraventions for all municipalities, decrease the time
frame in the Vancouver Charter for completing
remedial action requirements and parallel the authority all
other local governments have under the Local Government
Act to provide the city of Vancouver with the statutory
authority to enter into latecomer agreements and impose and
collect latecomer charges in relation to multi-phase
developments." Quickscribe will keep you informed once these
changes come into force. A reminder that local governments can
track changes to the LGA and Community Charter by
setting up alerts via the Alerts page (above). In the meantime,
you can view the proposed changes here.
Overview of Local Government EPA Feedback
UBCM has produced a broad overview of local government feedback
expressed as part of the ongoing Emergency Program Act review.
This document has been forwarded to Emergency Management BC
(EMBC) for consideration as the Province contemplates
significant changes to its emergency management legislation.
The local government feedback under consideration was provided
in response to EMBC's discussion paper, Modernizing BC's
Emergency Management Legislation. In addition to UBCM's
overview document, EMBC will also be developing a summary of
feedback received from all stakeholders (including local
governments). Read the full UBCM article.
Carbon Pricing Reference at Supreme Court of Canada
Lidstone
& Company Issued the following bulletin for local
government clients February 28, 2020:
This Spring the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will hear two
appeals regarding the federal Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act.
The Supreme Court's decision will determine whether the federal
government has the constitutional authority under its "Peace
Order and Good Government Power" to impose minimum national
pricing standards for greenhouse gas emissions. The case
includes two appeals, one from the Ontario Court of Appeal and
one from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, and it has already
made headlines across the country as people in every province
have followed its progress. Climate change, and governments'
willingness to mitigate and adapt to it, is the most pressing
issue of our time, and this case will determine the extent to
which the federal government can require minimum emissions
pricing in all provinces.
In both Saskatchewan's and Ontario's appeals to their
respective Courts of Appeal, the result was the same: the Greenhouse
Gas Pollution Pricing Act was held to be constitutional
by a majority in both courts, with each Court's Chief Justice
upholding the federal legislation. Both provinces have appealed
to the SCC. Read the full article.
Budget Speech Highlights [UBCM Analysis]
Finance Minister Carole James delivered the provincial budget
in the legislature Tuesday [Feb 18]. Minister James announced a
surplus in the current fiscal year of $203 million, with
projections of modest surpluses between $179 and $374 million
over three years. The budget provided updates on cannabis
revenue and expenditure projections, increased funding for
wildfire and emergency response and an operational reduction
for the office of the Auditor General for Local Government.
Budget elements of interest for local government include the
following:
- The provincial share of the cannabis excise tax is expected
to generate $190 million in over three years. Over the same
period, the province estimates $18 million in new costs to
support safe implementation of legalized cannabis. This new
funding is in addition to a projected $52 million in
provincial costs over three years.
- Appropriations for AGLG operations show a reduction from
$2.6 million in 2019/20 to $1.8 million in 2020/21 (a
reduction of over 30% of the current budget).
- New investments in affordable housing, in addition to the
commitment of $1 billion over three years, to support the
construction of new low- and middle-income housing as
follows:
- $56 million in 2020/21 for 200 new units of supportive
modular housing
- $50 million over the three years of the plan for services
to support homeless and those at risk of losing their home.
Funding will be used to create "navigation centres" to
provide integrated shelter, medical and support services.
Read the full UBCM article.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Bylaw Notice Enforcement Regulation (175/2004) |
Feb. 12/20 |
by Reg
18/2020 |
Cannabis Licensing Regulation (202/2018) |
Feb. 4/20 |
by Reg 14/2020 |
Leadership Contestant Financing Regulation (24/2020) |
NEW
Feb. 19/20 |
see Reg 24/2020 |
Leadership Contestant Financing Regulation (433/99) |
REPEALED
Feb. 19/20 |
by Reg 24/2020 |
Nomination Contestant Regulation (25/2020) |
NEW
Feb. 19/20 |
see Reg 25/2020 |
Political Party and Constituency Association Financial Reports
Regulation (26/2020) |
NEW
Feb. 19/20 |
see Reg 26/2020 |
Political Party and Constituency Association Financial Reports
Regulation (434/99) |
REPEALED
Feb. 19/20 |
by Reg 26/2020 |
Provincial Heritage Register (Chinese Canadian
Heritage Properties) Regulation (10/2018) |
REPEALED
Feb. 7/20 |
by Reg 17/2020 |
Provincial Heritage Register Regulation (17/2020) |
NEW
Feb. 7/20 |
see Reg 17/2020 |
Trespass Act |
Feb. 21/20 |
by 2019 Bill 35, c. 36, section 19 only (in force by Reg 29/2020), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2),
2019 |
Voter Registration Regulation (206/2015) |
Feb. 19/20 |
by Reg 27/2020 |
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Miscellaneous News:
Supreme Court Act – Proposed Amendments
On February 27, 2020, the government introduced the Miscellaneous
Statutes Amendment Act (Bill 13). The Bill amends several laws
including proposed amendments to the Supreme Court Act. According to
the government the intent will be to improve access to justice
and reduce court delays. The proposed amendments would allow
the appointment of five more judges to the B.C. Supreme Court,
for a total of 95 judges in addition to the chief justice and
the associate chief justice.
Criminal Practice Directions, Notices, and Guidelines
From BC Courts
The Honourable Associate Chief Justice Holmes has issued an
updated version of CPD-4 (Criminal Practice Direction 4 - Procedure
for Detention Reviews Under s. 525 of the Criminal Code),
which comes into effect on Monday, March 2, 2020. The practice
direction was updated to reflect experience with the process to
date and to address amendments to s. 525 of the Code, which came into force
on December 18, 2019. CPD-4 and electronic versions of the
appended forms are posted on the Court website under "Practice
Directions – Criminal". View the Criminal Practice Direction.
Just the Facts, Ma'am! OIPC Orders Disclosure of
Factual and
Narrative Information in an Investigation
Order F19-41 (2019 BCIPC 46) from the Office of the Information
& Privacy Commissioner ("OIPC") reviews a professor's
requests for records from a university's disciplinary
investigations into his conduct at work and the university's
decision to withhold certain documents pursuant to ss. 13 and
22 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act ("FIPPA"). The records in dispute were
emails, memos and key message documents about communication
matters, security officer incident reports, summaries of
events, an investigator's notes, and the minutes of a
department meeting.
It is important for post-secondary institutions and other
public bodies to be apprised of the documents they may
withhold, and those that must be disclosed if requested. This
case helps to clarify what information can and cannot be
withheld. Read the full article by Catherine Repel with
Clark Wilson LLP.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Exemption Regulation (27/2002) |
Feb. 14/20 |
by Reg 21/2020 |
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act |
Feb. 27/20 |
by Reg 34/2020 |
Government Reporting Entity Regulation (134/2001) |
Feb. 14/20 |
by Reg 20/2020 |
Jury Regulation (282/95) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 38/2020 |
Police (Uniforms) Regulations (564/76) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 40/2020 |
Social Services Employers Regulation (84/2003) |
Feb. 18/20 |
by Reg 23/2020 |
MOTOR
VEHICLE & TRAFFIC |
Motor Vehicle and Traffic
News:
New Legislation To Keep Future
ICBC Surplus in Hands of ICBC
The Province is poised to introduce legislation that will
prevent any BC government from directing ICBC to make payments
to government from its excess optional insurance capital. This
will ensure that any future surpluses remain with ICBC to be
used for the benefit of drivers. Read the government news release.
BC's Distracted Driving Law Could Be Adjusted after
Another Ticket Tossed Out by Court
The latest distracted driving ticket to get tossed out by a
B.C. judge could lead to adjustments to the law itself, the
province's public safety minister says. The decision handed
down in Victoria provincial court Tuesday [Feb 11] concerned a
Victoria woman who was fined for having her phone sitting on
her lap while stopped at a red light in December 2018 in
Esquimalt. The police officer who issued the ticket noted the
phone's screen was not illuminated at the time and the woman
was not touching the phone, which was connected to a charging
cable. Read the Global News article.
BC Government Introduces Legislation to Cap
Expert Reports in ICBC Settlement Cases
The BC government is taking another crack at cutting down on
the use of expert reports in ICBC settlement cases. The
province is introducing amendments to the Evidence Act that will limit the
number of experts and expert reports that can be used in court
on the issue of damages. "With limits on the number of experts
and expert reports, we are reducing the cost, complexity, and
delay associated with expensive duelling experts," Attorney
General David Eby said. "It means that claims will be resolved
more efficiently." Read the Global News article.
Amendments Clarify, Update Motor Vehicle Act
Proposed amendments that clarify and update the Motor Vehicle Act have been
introduced as Bill 2, the Motor Vehicle Amendment
Act, 2020. According to the government, changes to the Motor
Vehicle Act support road safety and better trained
drivers by enabling government to require standardized training
as a pre-licensing requirement for various classes of drivers'
licences. Amendments would require any prescribed training
courses to be approved by the Insurance Corporation of British
Columbia (ICBC) and provided by a person or organization
authorized by ICBC. The proposed amendments afford government
the authority to provide exemptions and to delegate authority
to ICBC to provide exemptions. They also delegate to ICBC the
authority to determine if training received in other
jurisdictions meets BC standards. Read the full government news
release.
Case Summary: Drinking, Driving, and
Coverage Do Not Mix
The insured driver was intoxicated by alcohol to the point
where she was incapable of proper control of her vehicle, thus
breaching a condition of her insurance policy.
Derkson v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, 2019 BCSC 2009, [2019] B.C.J. No. 2228,
2019 BCSC 2009, British Columbia Supreme Court, November 22,
2019, K. Horsman J.
The insured rear-ended another vehicle after consuming alcohol
at a pub, causing vehicle damage and personal injuries to the
insured's passenger and the other driver. The insurer, the
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC), denied
coverage on the basis that the insured was "incapable of proper
control of the vehicle" at the time of the collision, and was
therefore in breach of her conditions of insurance. Read the full article by Joe Antifaev with Harper
Grey LLP.
CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following notices were posted in February by CVSE:
- VI Bulletin 01-20 – Semi-Annual
Inspections and Decal Stock Issue
- Important Notice from Metro Vancouver
– Translink and the City of North Vancouver would like
you to know that a truck detour around the Mosquito Creek
Bridge will be in place for about five months, beginning
February 18, 2020. Maximum weight on the bridge during
planned construction will be 20,000 kg GCVW
For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE
website.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicles Regulation (25/2015) |
Mar. 1/20 |
by Reg 15/2020 |
Motor Vehicle Act |
Feb. 14/20 |
by 2019 Bill 35, c. 36, section 83 only (in force by Reg 22/2020), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2),
2019 |
Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (26/58) |
Feb. 14/20 |
by Reg 22/2020 |
Offence Act Forms Regulation |
Feb. 14/20 |
by Reg 22/2020 |
Special Direction IC2 to the BC Utilities Commission (307/2004) |
Feb. 6/20 |
by Reg 16/2020 |
Supreme Court Civil Rules (168/2019) |
Feb. 1/20 |
by Reg 18/2019 |
Violation Ticket Administration and Fines Regulation (89/97) |
Feb. 28/20 |
by Reg 37/2020 and Reg 40/2020 |
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY |
Occupational Health & Safety
News:
Religious Freedom vs. Occupational Health and Safety:
The Quebec Court of Appeal Rules in Favour of the Latter
There is a great societal debate going on in Quebec with the
National Assembly's recent adoption of the Act respecting
the laicity of the State, which regulates the wear of
religious symbols at the government level. The province's
highest court contributed to the debate with its recent
decision in Singh c. Montréal Gateway Terminals
Partnership, which particularly affects
federally-regulated businesses.
In this case, freedom to wear religious symbols is pitted
against an employer's legal obligations to ensure and maintain
occupational health and safety. The Quebec Court of Appeal
affirmed a Superior Court judgment which held that occupational
health and safety prevails over religious freedom, at least in
this matter. Read the full article by Mikaël Maher with Fasken Martineau
DuMoulin LLP.
New OHS Guidelines
On February 14, 2020, WorkSafe BC published new and revised
guidelines a number of topics including respirators. View the
details on the WorkSafeBC site here.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information
|
There
were no amendments this month. |
PROPERTY
& REAL ESTATE |
Property and Real Estate News:
Budget 2020 Update: Is There Clarity for Limited
Partnerships and Foreign Buyers' Tax?
On February 18, 2020, the government of BC introduced its 2020
provincial budget. Included in the budget is a new exemption
from the additional property transfer tax, commonly known as
the "foreign buyers' tax", which will be available for
qualifying Canadian-controlled limited partnerships. Though the
specific language of the exemption will not be confirmed until
the exemption becomes effective when passed through regulation
at a later date, the expectation is that the new exemption will
treat Canadian-controlled limited partnerships in a manner
consistent with Canadian-controlled corporations, ensuring that
the tax will apply consistently to those investors who choose
to invest through Canadian-controlled limited partnerships as
those who invest through Canadian-controlled corporations. Read
the full article by Maxwell P. Carroll and Zander R. Grant with Lawson Lundell LLP.
New Security Deposit Rules Will Help Tenants
Get Their Money Back, BC Says
Renting in British Columbia's major cities is notoriously
difficult. Vacancy rates in Metro Vancouver and Greater
Victoria hover around one per cent, and average
rents are among Canada's most expensive. New
security deposit rules announced by the provincial government
Friday [February 7th] won't change any of that, but they will
make life a bit easier for tenants trying to recover funds from
stubborn landlords. The new process will allow renters to
submit an application to the Residential Tenancy Branch if
their landlord does not return an uncontested security or pet
deposit within 15 days of the end of a rental agreement. If
approved, the renter will receive an order for the return of
the deposit that they can serve to the landlord or take to
provincial small claims court. Read the CTV article.
BC Liberals Introduce Legislation to Address
Skyrocketing Strata Insurance Rates
The BC Liberals have introduced legislation the party says
would address skyrocketing insurance rates that strata
corporations are being required to pay. See Strata Property Amendment Act, 2020.
Liberal MLA Todd Stone introduced private member's legislation
on Tuesday [Feb 25] that, if passed, would require insurance
companies to provide strata corporations insurance renewal
terms at least 30 days in advance. Pressure has been mounting
on the provincial government to act. While full building
recovery insurance is mandated under the BC Strata Property Act, there is no
mechanism in place to ensure private insurers will offer the
coverage at an affordable cost. Read the Global News
article.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Residential Tenancy Act |
Feb. 18/20 |
by 2017 Bill 16, c. 18, section 30 only (in force by Reg 19/2020), Tenancy Statutes Amendment Act, 2017 |
Residential Tenancy Regulation (477/2003) |
Feb. 18/20 |
by Reg 19/2020 |
WILLS
& ESTATES |
Wills and Estates News:
BC Wills Variation- Unequal Treatment of Adult
Children
If there is one underlying principle that I have been exposed
to in decades of estate litigation, it is that adult children
of a deceased parent expect to be treated equally (or better)
than their siblings.
The societal advent of more frequent so-called blended
families, divorce, and remarriage with new family has in many
situations complicated the accomplishment of treating all the
children equally.
There is no requirement to in BC wills variation litigation or
S. 60 WESA that requires a deceased
parent to treat his or her children equally, and if done, this
in itself does not necessarily establish a moral claim by the
child(ren) who have been "shortchanged" in their inheritance.
Simply put the test is adequate provision and not equal
provision. Read the full article by Trevor Todd with
disinherited Estates Disputes and Contested Wills.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
There
were no amendments this month. |
The
content of this document is intended for client use only.
Redistribution to anyone other than Quickscribe clients
(without the prior written consent of Quickscribe) is
strictly prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD.
DISCLAIMER
The Reporter includes articles that should be used for
information and educational purposes only and are not intended
to be a source of legal advice. Please consult
with a lawyer before choosing to act on any information
included in the Reporter. The content in each article is owned
by its respective author.
UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE
To unsubscribe from this service, click here. |