COMPANY
& FINANCE |
Company and Finance News:
Cryptocurrency and Tax Reporting Obligations
Section 233.3 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "ITA")
requires Canadian resident taxpayers (subject to certain
exceptions) and partnerships with Canadian resident members
(subject to certain exceptions) (each referred to as a
"specified Canadian entity") to report ownership of their
"specified foreign property" if the total cost of their
"specified foreign property" exceeds $100,000 in aggregate at
any time during a taxation year. Taxpayers are required to file
a Form T1135, "Foreign Income Verification Statement" ("Form
T1135") in these circumstances. Read the full article by Molly Luu and Anish
Kamboj with Miller Thomson LLP.
CSA Releases Enforcement Report for 2021
The Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") recently
released its annual report on the enforcement
activities of its members (the "Report"). The Report provides a
snapshot of the enforcement activities taken by Canadian
securities regulators over the last 12 months.
The number of enforcement proceedings commenced have increased
slightly from 2020 and are significantly higher than 2019.
While the number of whistleblower complaints and the total
quantum of fines, penalties and general compensation have
decreased from 2020, we do not believe this signals any
intention on the part of regulators to diminish their
enforcement efforts. Read the full article by René Sorell, Sean D. Sadler, Wendy Berman, Shane C. D'Souza and Jonathan Nehmetallah with McCarthy
Tétrault.
From Deadlock to Liquidation – A Cautionary Tale
Petersen v. Hawley serves as a
stark reminder that "shareholders of closely-held companies who
go into business together without providing for the resolution
of future conflicts in a written agreement are courting
disaster – even if (and perhaps especially if) they are
related by blood." In Reasons released May 18, 2022, the
British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld a decision by the
Chambers Judge that it was "just and equitable" to order
liquidation of a deadlocked company due to an ongoing and
bitter conflict between identical twin brothers, each holding
50% of shares of the family company. Read the full article by Jordanna Cytrynbaum,
Carey Veinotte, Jessica L. Lewis and Shayna L. Clarke with
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP.
Mind the Gap: Comments on Canada's Tax Gap
In June 2022, Canada published a report concerning its tax gap.
A "tax gap" is the difference between (a) the amount of money a
tax authority could collect, in theory, if everyone complied
with the law; and (b) the amount in fact collected. Canada's
tax gap has remained stable for the period 2014 to 2018, at 9%
of tax revenue. This translates to between $20 billion and $24
billion for the years in question (because Federal tax revenue
increased). This briefing note addresses an interesting aspect
of the Canadian approach to reporting the tax gap, namely the
decision to publish both the "gross" and "net" gap (described
in detail below) and makes certain comparisons with the UK and
the US. Read the full article by Gareth O. Williams with
Lawson Lundell LLP.
BCFSA Launches Capital Modernization
Framework Project for Credit Unions
On June 28, 2022, BCFSA launched the Capital Modernization
Framework Project with an information session for all B.C.
credit unions. The Project to modernize the capital framework
for B.C.'s credit unions is a multi-year initiative to ensure
that capital adequacy requirements for credit unions continue
to reflect underlying risks and, as appropriate, developments
in international standards and best practices. The ultimate
outcome of this initiative is expected to be a new Capital Rule
that will replace the existing Capital Requirements Regulation. Read the
news release from BCFSA.
BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were recently published
on the BCSC website:
- 11-345 – CSA Consultation Paper
43-401 Consultation on National Instrument 43-101 Standards
of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
- 94-102 – National Instrument
94-101 Mandatory Central Counterparty Clearing of
Derivatives Adoption – National Instrument 94-102
Derivatives: Customer Clearing and Protection of Customer
Collateral and Positions
For more information visit the BC Securities website.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Business Corporations Regulation (65/2004) |
July 4/22 |
by Reg 114/2022 |
Cooperative Association Regulation (391/2000) |
July 4/22 |
by Reg 114/2022 |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax
Regulation (93/2013) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 47/2022 and Reg 142/2022 |
Aug. 1/22 |
Excluded Employees (Legal Proceedings) Indemnity Regulation
(62/2012) |
July 11/22 |
by Reg 162/2022 |
Judicial Officers (Legal Proceedings) Indemnity Regulation
(162/2022) |
NEW
July 11/22 |
see Reg 162/2022 |
National Instrument 94-102 Derivatives: Customer Clearing and
Protection of Customer Collateral and Positions (148/2017) |
July 26/22 |
by Reg 177/2022 |
Provincial Sales Tax Act |
July 1/22 |
by 2022 Bill 6, c. 11, sections 47, 51, 54, 55, 57, 80 to 97,
101 and 102 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2022 |
Provincial Sales Tax Exemption and Refund Regulation (97/2013)
|
July 1/22 |
by Reg 154/2022 |
Provincial Sales Tax Regulation (96/2013) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 154/2022 |
Societies Regulation (216/2015) |
July 4/22 |
by Reg 114/2022 |
Tobacco Tax Act |
July 1/22 |
by 2022 Bill 6, c. 11, sections 109, 113 and 114 only (in force
by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2022 |
ENERGY
& MINES |
Energy and Mines News:
Cap in Hand: Canada's Federal Government
Considering Oil and Gas Emissions Cap
The Government of Canada recently published its Discussion Paper on options to cap and
cut emissions from the country's oil and gas sector. The
Discussion Paper is the latest step from a federal government
that has been very active in introducing and implementing
measures intended to curb Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions as part of the overall effort to meet its
international commitments and to achieve "net-zero" emissions
by 2050. Read the full article published by Dentons.
Natural Gas Is Officially Green in Europe
Adding natural gas to EU's taxonomy could mean increased
investment here
European fund managers of sustainable portfolios who have,
heretofore, shunned nuclear power and natural gas and LNG can
now invest in those energy stocks with a clear conscience.
The EU Parliament this week voted to include both natural gas
and nuclear power as sustainable energy sources in its
taxonomy, which defines what is green and clean and what isn't
for pension fund managers and other asset managers that have
sustainable portfolios – sometimes known as ethical
investments, or ESG investments (environmental, social and
governance). Read the BIV article.
Canadian Clean Fuel Regulations Are Now in Force
The long-awaited final Clean Fuel Regulations (the
"Regulations"), developed by Environment and Climate Change
Canada ("ECCC") under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
("CEPA"), were registered on, and are in force as of, June 21,
2022. They were published in the Canada Gazette II on July 6, 2022.
Read the full article by Alex Sadvari with Gowling WLG.
BC Company Wins Prize for Reducing Mine Water Use
Sepro Mixing and Pumping, a B.C. industrial equipment maker,
has won a $150,000 prize for technology that reduces the use of
water at mine sites.
Foresight Canada and the Mining Association of BC (MABC) held
a contest, the Mining Innovation Challenge, aimed at finding
ways to reduce the use of water in mining operations. Mines use
large amounts of fresh water to move mine waste (slurry), which
must be stored in tailings ponds. Read the BIV article.
Recent BCOGC Bulletins
The BCOGC has recently issued the following bulletin:
Visit the BCOGC website to view this and other
bulletins.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
There
were no amendments this month. |
FAMILY
& CHILDREN |
Family and Children News:
BC Ministry of Attorney General Seeking Comments
on Reform of Property Division and Spousal
Support Under the Family Law Act
As part of an ongoing project to review and update the Family Law Act, the Ministry of
Attorney General for BC has published a discussion paper on
property division (part 5 of the act) and spousal support (part
7, division 4). The Family Law Act Modernization project webpage
contains links to a survey, backgrounder, and full technical
discussion paper.
As the discussion paper explains, the advent of the Family
Law Act in 2013 introduced a new approach to property
division. Since that time, "the courts of British Columbia have
grappled with how to interpret the new provisions," which has
led to new issues emerging that could be addressed through
amended legislation. Read the full article by Kevin Zakreski with the
British Columbia Law Institute.
Child's Vacation Stay in BC Doesn't Affect
Habitual Residence: BC Court of Appeal
A child's temporary accommodations during a vacation would not
constitute their habitual residence under British Columbia's Family Law Act, the BC Court of
Appeal has ruled.
In Aslanimehr v. Hashemi, 2022 BCCA 248, the parties were Iranian
citizens who got married and resided in Iran. They had one
child. From 2016 to 2018, they visited Canada for long periods.
The father had acquired Canadian citizenship as a teenager,
while the mother obtained permanent resident status in Canada
during one of these visits. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian
Lawyer.
BC Court of Appeal Orders Father to Return
Child He Relocated Without Court Approval
Any change in child's residence that would significantly impact
their relationship with one of their parents is considered
"relocation" under the law, the British Columbia Court of
Appeal has ruled.
The dispute in R.P. v. G.U., 2022 BCCA 255 stemmed from a father's
alleged act of "relocating" with his nine-year-old son to
Victoria, which the mother opposed. The parties were married in
2010 and resided in White Rock, BC. They separated in 2016,
with their parenting time fluctuating between them. Read the full article by Angelica Dino in the Canadian Lawyer.
Decision on Child Support Agreements Will Be Useful
for All Family Lawyers in BC, Counsel Says
B.C.'s family law legislation allows courts to retroactively
vary child support payments outlined in a separation agreement,
the province's top court has ruled.
Justice Bruce Butler, writing for a unanimous Court of Appeal
in a decision issued July 4, held that an interpretation of the
Family Law Act (FLA) to permit such
a variation aligns with the provincial legislature's intention
that child support agreements be variable in the face of
changing circumstances for parent and child (Hinz v. Davey
2022 BCCA 232). Read the full article by Ian Burns in The
Lawyer's Daily.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Court of Appeal Act |
REPEALED
July 18/22 |
by 2021 Bill 11, c. 6, section 52 only (in force by Reg 120/2022), Court of Appeal Act |
Court of Appeal Act |
NEW
July 18/22 |
c. 6, SBC 2022, Bill 11, whole Act in force by Reg 120/2022 |
Court of Appeal Rules (297/2001) |
REPEALED
July 18/22 |
by Reg 120/2022 |
Court of Appeal Rules (120/2022) |
NEW
July 18/22 |
see Reg 120/2022 |
Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act |
July 18/22 |
by 2021 Bill 11, c. 6, section 55 only (in force by Reg 120/2022), Court of Appeal Act |
Supreme Court Act |
July 18/22 |
by 2021 Bill 11, c. 6, section 56 only (in force by Reg 120/2022), Court of Appeal Act |
FOREST
& ENVIRONMENT |
Forest and
Environment News:
Forest Practices Board Releases
2021-22 Annual Report
The Forest Practices Board has released its 2021-22 annual
report, which provides a summary of the board's work in each of
its program areas. The annual report also highlights strategic
accomplishments, including work on Indigenous engagement and
reconciliation, and the introduction of changes to the Forest and Range Practices Act, a
number of which reflect past board recommendations. Read the report from the BC Forest Practices
Board.
Competency and Authority: Two Sides
of the Same Regulatory Coin
The die is cast and we now operate under the Professional Governance Act (PGA).
It is in these nascent stages of professional governance and
government oversight that forest professionals ought to take a
moment to understand some terms being used that are cornerstone
to our successful compliance and implementation of the PGA.
When the term "qualified registered professional" is used,
what comes to your mind? For myself, it is the juxtaposition of
competence and authority that give rise to being qualified, as
they are two sides of the same regulatory coin. Read the full article by Garnet Mierau, published
in the Summer 2022 issue of the BC Forest Professional
Magazine.
Association of BC Forest Professionals Amends
Code and Bylaws [Reflects PGA]
The bylaws governing the Association of BC
Forest Professionals (ABCFP) have been amended to reflect
operational business needs and changes in authorities,
terminology, and other provisions in the Professional Governance Act.
The ABCFP council approved the amended bylaws on June 9 and
they were brought into force under the authority of the
Superintendent of Professional Governance on July 4. Read the notice from Canadian Forest Industries.
Will the BC/Tahltan Project Consent
Agreement Deliver on Its Promises?
On June 6, 2022, Premier John Horgan announced that British
Columbia (Province or BC) would be taking a historic step by
entering into an agreement with the Tahltan Central Government
(TCG) to review and, ultimately determine, whether the Eskay
Creek Revitalization Project (Project) will be permitted to
proceed. According to Premier Horgan, this "consent-based
decision-making agreement" will:
- deliver on the promise of reconciliation;
- support predictability for business;
- encourage responsible investment for business in BC; and
- position BC as a preferred destination for ESG
(environmental, social and governance) investors.
Read the full article by Arend J.A. Hoekstra and
Viviana Berkman with Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP.
Auditing Forest Professionals: Why and How
Does the ABCFP Audit Registrants and
Authorize Practice Reviews
While most of you are generally aware the ABCFP conducts
competence and professional conduct audits, the reasons for
doing so and the audit process may not be well understood until
you are notified by the ABCFP of audit selection. The why and
how of auditing competence and professional conduct by the
ABCFP has multiple scales.
At the smallest scale, the Professional Governance Act (PGA)
requires the ABCFP to serve and protect the public interest
with respect to the forestry profession, professional
governance, and the conduct of registrants in regulated
practice. At a larger scale, the PGA also establishes more
specific responsibilities for the ABCFP to establish, monitor,
and enforce standards of practice. The key objective at this
scale is to enhance the quality of practice so registrants may
avoid professional misconduct, conduct unbecoming a registrant,
and incompetent performance of duties while engaged in the
regulated practice of forestry. Read the full article by Paul Nuttall, published
in the Summer 2022 issue of the BC Forest Professional
Magazine.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made
recently:
Wildlife Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
Forest Appeals Commission Decisions
No Forest Appeals Commission decisions were made recently.
Visit the Forest Appeals Commission website for more information.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Annual Rent Regulation (122/2003) |
July 11/22 |
by Reg 163/2022 |
Closed Areas Regulation (76/84) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 157/2022 |
Designation and Exemption Regulation (168/90) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 157/2022 |
Hunting Regulation (190/84) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 157/2022 |
Motor Vehicle Prohibition Regulation (196/99) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 157/2022 |
Old Growth Designated Area No. 1 (228/2020) |
July 20/22 |
by Reg 173/2022 |
Park, Conservancy and Recreation Area Regulation (180/90) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 123/2022 |
Refusal of Cutting Permit or Road Permit (252/2018) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 151/2022 |
Wildlife Act Commercial Activities Regulation (338/82) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 157/2022 |
Wildlife Act General Regulation (340/82) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 157/2022 |
HEALTH |
Health News:
British Columbia Court of Appeal Rules Against
Expansion of Private Health Care
Recently, the British Columbia Court of Appeal (the "BCCA")
released its decision in the case of Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British
Columbia (Attorney General). The case raised issues
about the constitutionality of the Medicare Protection Act (British
Columbia) (the "MPA"), which restricts the ability of residents
in British Columbia to pay privately for medically necessary
health care services. At trial, the Plaintiffs argued that this
restriction violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
(the "Charter'') as it prevents residents in British Columbia
from accessing private medical treatment when the public system
cannot provide timely care. Read the full article by Victoria Mitrova, Julia
Kindrachuk and Shawn Foster with Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP.
Ombudsperson Finds Only One-Third of Recommendations
Are Implemented Three Years After Report Calling
for Improved Safeguards for People Involuntarily
Detained in B.C. Psychiatric Facilities
Recommendations to protect the legal rights of people
involuntarily admitted to psychiatric facilities across the
province are still not being adequately implemented according
to an investigative update released by the British Columbia
Ombudsperson today.
In an update to his 2019 report, Committed to Change: Protecting the Rights
of Involuntary Patients under the Mental Health Act,
Ombudsperson Jay Chalke finds in the three years following the
report, only 8 of 24 recommendations have been fully
implemented. Read the full article from the Office of the
Ombudsperson.
BC Receives Three-Year Exemption to Decriminalize
Small-Scale Drug Possession
British Columbia has received a three-year exemption to
decriminalize possession of small amounts of certain illicit
drugs for personal use, the Ministry of Mental Health and
Addictions announced.
The ministry confirmed that BC is the first province in Canada
to receive the exemption from Health Canada under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
The exemption will provide another tool for the province to end
the overdose crisis and reduce the stigma and harm associated
with substance use. Read the full article by Katrina Eñano in the Canadian
Lawyer.
Health Canada Implements New
Labelling Standards for NHPs
Health Canada has implemented sweeping amendments to labelling
requirements under the Natural Health Products Regulations
(NHPR) as a result of challenges identified in recent years
surrounding the widespread use of Natural Health Products
(NHPs) by Canadians. The amendments imposing revised labelling
standards are subject to a three year transition period and
will come into force on June 21, 2025. NHPs licensed under the
former Regulations, which are labelled in compliance with prior
standards before the end of the three-year transition period,
will have a further three years from that date to conform to
the new requirements. Read the full article by Julia Schatz, Shelby Morrison and Maximillian Pivetta
with Bennett Jones LLP.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Health Care Costs Recovery Act |
July 18/22 |
by 2021 Bill 11, c. 6, section 54 only (in force by Reg 120/2022), Court of Appeal Act |
Health Professions Designation and Amalgamation Regulation
(270/2008) |
July 11/22 |
by Reg 164/2022 |
Premises Identification Regulation (125/2022) |
NEW
July 1/22 |
see Reg 125/2022 |
LABOUR
& EMPLOYMENT |
Labour and Employment News:
The Federal Government Unveils the Proposed
Regulations for Paid Sick Leave
On July 15, 2022 the federal government released its proposed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations
Made Under the Canada Labour Code (Medical Leave with Pay)
(the "Proposed Regulations"), with respect to paid sick leave
for federally regulated employees. Read the full article by Nicole K. Skuggedal and Miny Atwal with Lawson Lundell LLP.
Pregnancy and Employment –
the Statutory Requirements
Pregnancy can create tricky issues in an employment
relationship, triggering both requirements of the BC Employment Standards Act (the
"Act") and considerations under the Human Rights Code (the "Code"),
making termination or revision of the terms of employment
fraught with difficulty.
The Act establishes the statutory requirements, setting the
minimum standards for working conditions for all eligible
employees in BC. With respect to pregnancy in particular, the
Act includes a number of provisions placing responsibilities on
employers. The Code provides that an employee cannot be treated
differently because of pregnancy or childbirth. Differential
treatment in such circumstances would be discrimination for the
purposes of the Code. An employer cannot fire an employee
because they are pregnant or because they have taken maternity
or parental leave and they cannot unilaterally change a
fundamental condition of employment because of a pregnancy.
Read the full article by Rose Keith, QC with Harper Grey LLP,
published in The Verdict.
Case Summary: Court Upholds Decision of the WCAT
Dismissing Appeal for the Failure to File Claim
Application Within the One-Year Limitation Period
Aghili v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Appeal
Tribunal), [2022] B.C.J. No. 778, 2022 BCSC 717, British Columbia Supreme
Court, May 4, 2022, D. MacDonald J.
On May 1, 2019, the petitioner was allegedly injured while
lifting heavy tubing at work. The Workers' Compensation Act requires
an application for compensation to be commenced within one year
of the date of the injury. The petitioner filed a claim
application on June 25, 2020. After being informed that his
application was late, the petitioner submitted a letter
explaining that he was not able to meet the one year deadline
because he understood that the cause of the injury had to be
known. The petitioner also claimed that he was unfamiliar with
the application process and the one-year time limit. Read the full article by Jackson C. Doyle with
Harper Grey LLP.
Employee or Independent Contractor? BC's Court of
Appeal
Reminds Employers That Employment Relationships Are
Determined Based on a Fact-Specific, Contextual Approach
Employment lawyers are often asked to consider whether an
individual is an "employee" or an "independent contractor".
This is an important distinction for employers as the
consequences for misclassification can be significant. If
independent contractors are misclassified, employers may face
liabilities relating to (i) entitlements under applicable
employment standards legislation – including unpaid
wages, overtime pay, vacation pay and holiday pay; (ii)
wrongful dismissal damages (i.e. pay in lieu of notice); (iii)
Canada Pension Plan deductions and remittances; (iv),
Employment Insurance deductions and remittances; (v) penalties,
and interest, for failure to make income tax withholdings and
failure to issue T4s; and (vi) retroactive workers'
compensation premiums and penalties. Read the full article by Danielle Douglas and Reed
D. Smith with McCarthy Tétrault.
Collective Agreement Allows New Federal Statutory
Holiday To Be Added: B.C. Arbitrator
A British Columbia employer must add the new National Day of
Truth and Reconciliation to its collective agreement's list of
statutory holidays, an arbitrator has ruled.
The company argued that it wasn't the intention of the
agreement's holiday provision to add any new holidays
proclaimed by government, but the language used left it open to
such change, says James Kondopulos, a partner at Roper Greyell
in Vancouver. Read the full article by Jeffrey R. Smith in the Canadian
HRReporter.
Dismissed Employee's Pursuit of New Career
Results in Reduced Notice Period
In the wrongful dismissal context, a dismissed employee
typically has a duty to mitigate their losses following a
dismissal. That duty to mitigate most often requires an
employee to search, apply for, and accept reasonable new
employment to mitigate any claimed losses. A Court may reduce
the notice period where a dismissed employee fails to take
reasonable steps to mitigate, usually by failing to reasonably
pursue new opportunities. At times, the Courts have held that
an employee's attempt to train themselves for a new career can
be considered an appropriate mitigation strategy, but only
after the employee has first made reasonable and diligent
efforts to test the market and find new employment in their
area of expertise. This issue was revisited in Okano v.
Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, 2022 BCSC 881, where the Supreme Court of
British Columbia found that a dismissed employee had not
properly sought employment in her field before looking for work
outside of it. Read the full article by Boris Subara with Fasken Martineau Du
Moulin LLP.
New Pension Plan Information & Records Guidelines
Come into Effect September 30th
As noted previously on this blog, pension regulators have been
working towards increasing guidance for pension plan
administrators in relation to protecting pension plan
information and records. The BC Financial Services Authority
(FSA) issued drafts of its Information Security Guideline and
its Outsourcing Guideline, invited consultation, and in October
2021, issued final versions of those guidelines, which can be
found here
and here.
It has advised that the guidelines are considered to be in
effect on September 30, 2022. Read the full article by Lisa Chamzuk with Lawson Lundell LLP.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Employment and Assistance Regulation (263/2002) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 159/2022 |
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities
Regulation (265/2002) |
July 1/22 |
by Reg 159/2022 |
Social Services Employers Regulation (84/2003) |
July 11/22 |
by Reg 170/2022 |
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
Local Government News:
New Reference Guide for Regional Districts
Published on Quickscribe
The Community Charter provides the
statutory framework for most municipalities in BC, and sets out
municipalities' core areas of authority. In order for certain
provisions of the Community Charter to apply equally to
regional districts, cross references were added to the Local Government Act. For your
convenience, Quickscribe has published an updated guide that provides a
reference showing which provisions in the CC also apply to
regional districts. The guide is accessible via the left
navigation.
Pre-Campaign Period for B.C. Municipal
Elections Begins Monday
B.C. municipal elections are scheduled for October 15
B.C. residents who come across political ads for the upcoming
municipal election can now check if they comply with election
laws.
Elections BC says the "pre-campaign period" for the 2022
General Local Elections begins Monday, July 18 and runs until
Sept. 16, 2022. Election advertising rules come into effect at
the start of the pre-campaign period and last until the
election on October 15. Read the BIV article.
Wildfire Act Review
The BC Wildfire Service is assessing provincial wildfire
legislation and policy framework to determine whether
improvements could be made to better support local governments
with preventing human-caused wildfires. Local governments are
encouraged to complete the survey. Read the notice from UBCM.
The Future of Builder's Lien Law
The BC Court of Appeal recently clarified builder's lien law in
JVD Installations. The court also
hinted at ways the law may develop in the coming years. The
decision has significant implications for both owners and
builders. So, let's dig into what the decision says. Then,
let's discuss what it means and how you can prepare. Read the full article by Sheldon Falk with Civic
Legal LLP.
City Councillor's Restaurant Ownership Not Part
of Common Interest: BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that a
councillor had a conflict of interest when he participated in
and voted for a program meant to ease pandemic restrictions
while having pecuniary interest in a restaurant that was among
the first to secure permits for the programs.
In Redmond v. Wiebe, 2022 BCCA 244, Michael Wiebe was an
elected member of the Vancouver City Council who also had
interest in a restaurant and a pub. When indoor attendance at
restaurants was restricted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the
city adopted a program that allowed an extension of outdoor
seating. This program required restaurants to secure permits.
Read the full article by Jason Tan in the Canadian Lawyer.
Local Election Resources for Candidates
General local elections in B.C. are held every four years on
the third Saturday in October. The next general local elections
will be held on October 15, 2022. Resources for the elections
are now available on the Ministry of Municipal Affairs website.
Read the full article from UBCM.
Ombudsperson Renews Call for Oversight of
Municipal Jails in RCMP Policed Communities
In the wake of a recent investigation by the Independent
Investigations Office into a case that identified serious
concerns about the conduct of a civilian jail guard who failed
to provide adequate care to a man in custody, the Ombudsperson
is renewing calls for independent oversight of jail guards in
municipalities policed by the RCMP. Read the full news release from the Office of the
Ombudsperson.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Bylaw Notice Enforcement Regulation (175/2004) |
July 13/22 |
by Reg 166/2022 |
Cannabis Licensing Regulation (202/2018) |
July 8/22 |
by Reg 160/2022 |
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Miscellaneous News:
Small Claims Rules Changes Coming October 3rd –
Early Consolidation/Summary
Order in Council No. 401 was approved and
ordered on July 11, 2022. The Order makes changes to the Small
Claims Rules. For your convenience, Quickscribe has published an early consolidation of the Rules as
they will read when these amendments come into effect on
October 3, 2022. Among other changes, the Order increases the
time required for the submission of documents on which a party
intends to rely at various types of hearings, including for
settlement conferences, mediation sessions, trials, payment
hearings, and default hearings. Greater detail regarding some
of these changes is provided below.
Each party must file all documents it intends to rely on at a
settlement conference with the registry at least 14 days before
the conference takes place, and must serve the documents on the
opposing party at least 7 days before the conference. A
defendant who receives a medical report from medical
practitioner must submit the report to the registry at least 14
days before the settlement conference, and must serve it on the
claimant at least 7 days before the settlement conference. At a
settlement conference, the judge will have the jurisdiction to
order that the trial be attended by telephone, video
conference, or other electronic means. The Order contains
transition provisions that set out what rules apply during the
transition from the old to new provisions.
Documents that will be relied on in a mediation session must
be provided to the mediator and all parties before the
mediation session, whereas under the current Rules parties must
simply bring copies of documents to the mediation session.
A defendant must now file a copy of a medical report received
from a medical practitioner with the registry 14 days before
trial, and serve a copy on the claimant 7 days before trial.
The amendments to the rules permit judges hearing trial
conferences to order that trials be attended by telephone,
video, or other means of electronic communication. If this type
of order is made, the judge must also make orders regarding how
and when documents to be relied on at trial are to be served by
the parties. The amendments also provide for transition
provisions related to these rules.
If a judge makes an order changing a witness's method of
attendance, the judge must then make orders regarding how the
witness must serve documents and how the witness must attend.
The judge may make orders that the witness return money paid
for travelling expenses if no travel is required, and that the
party summoning the witness pay for the expenses of the new
method of attendance if applicable.
The amendments require that a creditor requesting a payment
hearing must do so by completing Form 12 and filing it at the
registry no later than 14 days before the date of the payment
hearing. The person named in the summons must now be served 14
days before the payment hearing, an increase from 7 days under
the current Rules. A person summoned to a payment hearing must
now file records and a statement of finances with the registry
at least 7 days before the hearing, as opposed to simply
bringing the records to the hearing, and must serve the records
on the creditor at least 2 business days before the hearing. A
debtor also has an obligation to file an updated statement of
finances if any material change occurs after the original
statement of finances is filed, and must do so before the
hearing takes place. The amendments also include new subrules
that provide for a judge to order a payment hearing, and
details of what may take place at a payment hearing.
The notice required to be provided to a person summoned to a
default hearing is increased from 7 to 14 days. A person
summoned to a default hearing must now file records and a
statement of finances with the registry at least 7 days before
the hearing, as opposed to simply bringing the records to the
hearing, and must serve the records on the creditor at least 2
business days before the hearing. A judge may direct that a
debtor swear or affirm the truth of the contents of a statement
of finances that has been filed.
A new subrule has been added stipulating that an order
changing a person's method of attendance at trial, a payment
hearing, or a default hearing may not be made by consent.
Another subrule has been added setting out the types of orders
that may be made without a hearing: changing a person's method
of attendance; an order extending or shortening a time limit;
an order correcting an accidental slip or omission in another
order; and any other order that a judge has the power to make
that does not require notice to another party.
A person who applies for an order that requires a hearing must
file all documents on which they intend to rely at the hearing
at least 7 days before the hearing, and must also serve them 7
days before the hearing. However, a final decision of the Civil
Resolution Tribunal must not be filed. If a person served with
documents in relation to a hearing wishes to rely on responsive
documents at the hearing, they must file and serve them at
least 2 business days before the hearing. As soon as
practicable after an order is made, the person who applied for
the order must serve it on all parties who did not attend the
hearing and on any witness affected by the order who was not
given notice of the hearing.
A number of Forms in Schedule B are repealed and replaced,
including Forms 1, 2, 3, 3.1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 23, 26, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39 and 40.
Quickscribe would like to thank Kristen Balcom for putting together this
summary.
B.C. Court of Appeal Provides Guidance on Proper
Procedure for Bringing Charter Challenges
The B.C. Court of Appeal's recent decision in The Redeemed
Christian Church of God v. New Westminster (City), 2022 BCCA 224, provides guidance on the
proper procedure for bringing a Charter challenge in British
Columbia. The court held that a Charter challenge in
British Columbia must be brought via action, not via petition.
This decision has important implications for future Charter
challenges in British Columbia because actions and petitions
are subject to different procedural rules that can influence
the course – and outcome – of Charter
litigation. Read the full article by Connor Bildfell and Patrick D. Sheppard with McCarthy
Tétrault LLP.
Be Aware, Switch Contractors with Care
Determining when a construction contract is terminated is
important for all parties involved in a project. For
contractors and subcontractors, it can dictate lien filing
deadlines. For owners, it can determine holdback obligations.
The case and decision
In May 2022, Justice Lamb of the British Columbia (BC) Supreme
Court released a decision that a mid-project termination of the
general contractor did not result in a termination of the head
contract for the purposes of the BC Builders Lien Act. The court found
that by hiring a new replacement contractor to complete all of
the original work, the owner intended to assign, rather than
terminate, the original head contract. As a result, the owner
was required to continue to retain the holdback from the
original head contract while the project was completed by the
new replacement contractor.
Read the full article by Chelsea A. Wilson with Dentons.
Abuse and Harassment Survivors 'Silenced'
By Non-Disclosure Agreements Fight
for Change to B.C. Law
PEI brought in legislation to limit use of NDAs, and B.C.'s
attorney general says changes possible here
Not even the death of her father could free Susan MacRae from
the legal restraints that prevent her from talking about the
sexual abuse she allegedly suffered as a child.
Four years ago, a B.C. judge dismissed MacRae's application to
nullify the non-disclosure agreement she'd signed in 1997 as
part of a legal settlement, court documents show. Not only
that, MacRae was ordered to pay her father's estate $500 in
court costs.
"It's so insulting," the Vancouver woman said. Though she is
legally forbidden to speak about what happened to her when she
was a child, MacRae's 84-year-old mother Marie is not and has
confirmed MacRae told her about the alleged sexual abuse long
before the NDA. Read the CBC article.
The Benefits of Bespoke Drafting: BC Court
Upholds Arbitration Provision and Class
Action Waiver in Consumer Context
Video gamers are accustomed to accepting terms and conditions
as part of their gameplay. Whether for the platform through
which they access the game, the hardware on which they play it,
the operating system that commands the hardware, the
internet service that enables their play, or for the game
itself, different terms of service apply to nearly every
interaction in games. While a consumer may be under the
impression that they are purchasing a copy of a game (an
artifact from a simpler time) in reality (and legally speaking)
the gamer is purchasing a licence to play the game in
accordance with limited, and often detailed, licence terms.
Read the full article by Ryan J. Black, Rebecca von Rüti, Tyson Gratton and Jason Lin (Summer
Student) with DLA Piper.
First Round of Competition Act Amendments Now
in Force
On April 26, 2022, the government of Canada revealed
significant proposed amendments to the Competition Act (the Act) as part
of the Budget Implementation Act, 2022, No. 1
(the BIA). As expected, these amendments have now come into
force with the BIA receiving Royal Assent on June 23, 2022. The
changes constitute the first step in the federal government's
plan for comprehensive reform to the Act, characterized by the
government as an initiative to improve the effectiveness of the
Act, and better protect Canadian consumers and the integrity of
the marketplace. Read the full article by Randal Hughes, Melanie Aitken, Adam Kalbfleisch, Zirjan (Zee) Derwa and Christina Skinner with Bennet Jones LLP.
Four BC First Nations Sign Education
Jurisdiction Agreements with Canada
The Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern
Affairs announced that four First Nations in
British Columbia have recently signed agreements with the
federal government to strengthen their right to establish and
control their own school systems.
Under the newly signed "education jurisdiction agreements,"
Cowichan Tribes, Lil'wat Nation, ʔaq̓am, and Seabird Island
will now have law-making authority over their K-12 basic
education systems, particularly in the following areas: teacher
certification, school certification, graduation requirements,
curriculum, and course approvals. Moreover, they will be
allowed to establish a "Community Education Authority" –
the legal equivalent of a school board – on their own or
together with other First Nations. Read the full article by Katrina Eñano in the Canadian
Lawyer.
Campbell: BC Supreme Court Confirms There Is No Tort
of Intrusion Upon Seclusion in BC, But Still Certifies
a Data Breach Action Not Certified in Ontario
In the latest chapter in the evolving area of privacy class
actions, the BC Supreme Court has concluded that the tort of
intrusion upon seclusion still does not exist in British
Columbia, despite recent musings by the Court of Appeal about
whether it should reconsider the existence of a common law
privacy tort.
In Campbell v. Capital One Financial Corporation, 2022 BCSC 928 the BC Supreme Court
certified a class proceeding against Capital One related to a
data breach on narrower terms than those sought by the
plaintiff. The court found that some of the pleaded causes of
action (including intrusion upon seclusion) were bound to fail
while others (negligence, breach of contract and breach of
consumer protection laws) should be certified. The decision is
consistent with the restrained approach that Canadian courts
have taken to the certification of privacy class actions in
recent months, as we reported in March and April of this year. Read the full article by Kevan Hanowski and Matthew P. Yensen with McCarthy
Tétrault.
COVID-19 Notice No. 54 – Masters Chambers
Pilot Starting August 15, 2022
BC
Supreme Court Announcement:
As set out in COVID-19 Notice No. 54, the Masters
Chamber Pilot, commencing on August 15, 2022, will provide a
means by which counsel can submit electronic chambers
application records in PDF format through Court Services
Online. Initially the Pilot will be available for matters 30
minutes or less at registries on Vancouver Island (Campbell
River, Courtenay, Duncan, Nanaimo, Port Alberni, and Victoria)
and Powell River. If the Pilot is successful, it will be
expanded to other areas of the province and to longer matters.
Detailed instructions about working with PDFs can be found here.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment
Information |
Civil Resolution Tribunal Act |
July 1/22 |
by 2022 Bill 9, c. 6, sections 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 10 only (in
force by Royal Assent), Attorney General Statutes Amendment Act, 2022 |
Class Proceedings Act |
July 18/22 |
by 2021 Bill 11, c. 6, section 53 only (in force by Reg 120/2022), Court of Appeal Act |
MOTOR
VEHICLE & TRAFFIC |
Motor Vehicle and Traffic
News:
Changes to Passenger Transportation
Act – Coming September 1st
The Passenger Transportation Amendment Act,
2022, was originally introduced in March 2022 and
is now scheduled to come into force on September 1st. The bill
amendments the Passenger Transportation Act by
making permanent two transitional authorities that were
established in 2019. These provisions establish a process which
allows people who were deemed ineligible to drive a passenger
directed vehicle to appeal that decision, as well as requiring
that passenger-directed vehicle drivers operating under a
temporary operating permit meet record-check requirements. The
Act applies to drivers of commercial vehicles that carry
passengers, such as taxis, limousines and ride-hail vehicles.
Limits on Recoverable Costs in Motor Vehicle
Cases Unconstitutional, B.C. Judge Rules
British Columbia has been dealt another blow in its fight to
defend a massive revamp of the provincial automobile insurance
system after a regulation limiting recoverable costs in car
accident cases was found to be unconstitutional.
In a decision released July 11, B.C. Supreme Court Justice
Nathan Smith wrote the regulation would prevent or discourage
some plaintiffs from accessing the court for a decision of
their case on its merits (Le v. British Columbia (Attorney
General) 2022 BCSC 1146). Read the full article by Ian Burns in The
Lawyer's Daily.
B.C. Government Appealing Decision
Striking Down Cap on ICBC Costs
The B.C. government says it intends to appeal a court decision
striking down a recently enacted regulation that limits how
much a plaintiff can be reimbursed for expert testimony and
other expenditures arising from motor vehicle accident claims.
The regulation caps reimbursement of fees, such as those
charged by experts, at 6% of either the total damages awarded
by the court or of the amount agreed to in a settlement. Read
the BIV article.
A Review of Ammonium Nitrate Regulations
and Best Practices in Canada
Read the review published by Transport Canada on July 6th.
CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following documents were posted recently by CVSE:
- CVSE1016 – 9-Axle Logging Truck
Routes
- Notice 05-21 – Oversize
Restriction for Travel on Highway 1 on Vancouver Island
- Notice 01-22 – Oversize and
Overweight Restrictions for Hwy 1 Between Hope and Spences
Bridge
- NSC Bulletin 01-2022 –
Publication of Carriers Cancelled for Cause
- CVSE1014 – LCV Operating
Conditions & Routes (July 2022)
- NSC Bulletin 02-2022 – Recording
Hours of Service for Taxis waiting in the queue at Airport,
Ferry or Cruise Ship Terminals
For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.
Passenger Transportation Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC
Passenger Transportation Board:
Industry Updates & Advisories
- Final Deadline to Activate Additional
Taxis
The Board is issuing a final activation deadline of December
31, 2022. Licensees will have until this date to activate
additional vehicles, or they will no longer be valid.
- Vancouver Cruise Ship Schedule for TNS and Taxi
Operators
As the 2022 cruise season commences in Vancouver, TNS and
Taxi Licensees are reminded to review their terms and conditions of
licence and the cruise schedule. The Board will
continue its efforts to ensure that any changes or amendments
are posted in the Weekly Bulletin and on the website.
- TOPs Processing Reminder
With grad and summer fast approaching, licensees planning to
apply for a Temporary Operating Permit (TOP) should do so
well in advance and not wait until the day before or the day
of the requested TOP start date. Processing cannot be
guaranteed in this short a time period. To learn more about
TOPs (including Peak Season and Regular), please see Reference Sheet 17.
Applications Received
- 14713-22 – Ali Farbehi
(YVRTransfer.ca Transportation)
- 15318-22 – Andre Louis Joseph Cyr
(Driverseat, Driverseat Kamloops)
- 15352-22 – Pacific Western
Charters Ltd. (Pacific Western Charters, Ebus, & Red
Arrow)
Application Decisions
- 15480-22 TOP – Penticton Eco Taxi
Ltd. [Approved]
- 15498-22 TOP – Williams Lake Taxi
Ltd. [Approved]
- Combined Decisions 14922-22, 15021-22,
14949-22, 14924-22 & 14923-22 – Yellow Cab
Company, Black Top Cabs Ltd., Maclure's Cabs (1984) Ltd.,
Vancouver Taxi Ltd. (PT 70538) & Vancouver Taxi Ltd. (PT
70546) [Approved]
- 14109-22 – Royal City Taxi Ltd.
[Approved]
- 15572-22 TOP – Elite Limousine
Service (2003) Ltd. [Refused]
- 14721-22 – 1151905 B.C. Ltd.
(Helix Limousine) [Approved in Part]
- 14303-22 – Avent Charter Inc.
[Approved]
- 14491-22 – 2 Brown Dogs Sidecar
Adventures Incorporated [Refused]
- 13854-21 – Green Coast Ventures
Inc. (Whistle!) [Refused]
- 15230-22 – Tofino Bus Services
Inc. (VI Connector, Tofino Bus, Island Bus Company)
[Approved]
- 15677-22 PS TOP – Presidential
Limousines Ltd. [Approved]
- 14168-22 – Mauricio Varas
(Freewest Tours Services) [Approved]
- 14107-22 – Transfer from the
Estate of Randell Arthur Ralph (RRR Transportation) to RRR
Limousine Services Ltd. [Approved]
Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date
|
Amendment Information |
Motor Fuel Tax Regulation (414/85) |
July 11/22 |
by Reg 167/2022 |
Zero-Emission Vehicles Act |
July 30/22 |
by SBC 2019, c. 29 |
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY |
Occupational Health & Safety
News:
Are Employers Liable for Injuries
When Working from Home?
The COVID‑19 pandemic has made remote work the "new normal".
The increase of remote work in British Columbia and worldwide
has led to many important discussions regarding the rights of
remote workers and employers' corresponding obligations. An
important question that has come up concerning remote work, is
regarding employers' liability for employees' work injuries
while they perform their work duties remotely. Read
the full article from Overholt Law LLP.
Notices and Reports: How to Properly
Report a Workplace Incident in B.C.
What are employers' obligations with regards to reporting,
investigations?
When it comes to OHS regulations hierarchy, B.C. is a little
different than any other province because the overarching Act
regulating workplace safety is the Workers' Compensation Act (WCA).
This provides the legal authority and framework for all of
WorkSafeBC's activities – including their occupational
health and safety activities (which is under Part 2 of the
Act).
Part 2 is made up of eight parts and schedules, which are
beefed up with supporting regulations (33 sections in total).
Most of these additional regulations are hazard-based legal
requirements which get their authority from the Act. Read the full article by Maia Foulis in Canadian Occupational
Safety.
Harassment Investigation Protocols Under Scrutiny
In Ahluwalia v. British Columbia (Workers'
Compensation Board), a worker's appeal was
dismissed after the Court of Appeal determined that the
WorkSafeBC Review Division had properly applied law and policy
in relation to a bullying and harassment investigation
conducted by the employer. Read the full article by Cathy Chandler with Fasken Martineau
DuMoulin LLP.
What You Need to Know About Workplace Inspections
Even for the most compliant workplaces, inspections can be a
daunting prospect. Workplace inspections are conducted by
whichever regulatory board in the province enforces legislation
(in B.C. this would be WorkSafeBC, in Ontario inspections are
conducted by the Ministry of Labour).
Workplaces cannot refuse an inspection, "they have to let the
inspector in, and they have to provide whatever documentation
they're asking for," says Catherine Bergeron. "They basically
have all the rights when coming to your workplace." Bergeron is
Health and Safety Team Lead at HR and safety consultancy
Peninsula Canada. Read the full article by Maia Foulis in Canadian Occupational
Safety.
New Public Health Orders
The Public Health Office (PHO) recently issued the following
orders and guidance:
Order:
Guidance:
Visit the PHO website to view these and other
related orders and notices.
OHS Policies/Guidelines – Updates
No OHS updates were posted in July.
Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore previous
OHS updates.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
There were no
amendments this month. |
PROPERTY
& REAL ESTATE |
Property and Real Estate News:
Residential Tenancy Act Amendments
On July 11, part of the Tenancy Statutes Amendment Act, 2018
was brought into force, amending the Residential Tenancy Act. The
amendment adds section 51.5, regarding tenant compensation and
requirement to vacate, which:
- adds an amount of compensation payable to a tenant if the
reason for including, in a fixed term tenancy agreement, a
requirement to vacate at the end of the term is not
accomplished or is accomplished but not maintained for at
least the prescribed period of time, and
- authorizes the director to excuse the landlord from paying
that compensation amount in extenuating circumstances.
The New Homebuyer Protection Period:
What It is and How It Works
On Thursday, July 21, 2022, the British Columbia Provincial
Government released details on its latest real estate consumer
protection initiative – the Homebuyer Protection Period.
Effective January 1, 2023, purchasers of residential
properties in British Columbia will be provided with a
mandatory 3 business day 'Homebuyer Protection Period'. During
this protection period, buyers may choose to walk away from an
accepted offer to purchase a residential real estate property
for any reason. Read the full article by Ephraim Fung and Michael
Switzer with Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.
Case Summary: Petition for Judicial Review Struck
as Improper Attack on Administrative Proceedings
Deng v. Real Estate Council of British Columbia, [2022]
B.C.J. No. 927, 2022 BCSC 879, British Columbia Supreme
Court, May 25, 2022, K.W. Ball J. (In Chambers)
The petitioner was a licensed realtor. She attempted to
arrange the purchase of a strata unit for her clients. The
clients were interested in Unit 59; however, it had an accepted
offer in place. The petitioner then showed the clients Unit
134. After the clients made an offer on Unit 134, but before
that offer was accepted, the petitioner was advised that the
conditions precedent on the offer on Unit 59 had not been
satisfied and Unit 59 was available. The petitioner never
communicated that information to her clients. Read the full summary by Joel A. Morris with
Harper Grey LLP.
BC to Expand Speculation and Vacancy
Tax to Six Additional Municipalities
British Columbia is set to expand its speculation and vacancy
tax (SVT) to six additional municipalities, the Ministry of
Finance announced. The SVT will soon be imposed on
municipalities of North Cowichan, Duncan, Ladysmith, Lake
Cowichan, Lions Bay, and Squamish. At present, it applies only
to areas of Metro Vancouver, Fraser Valley, Victoria, Kelowna,
Nanaimo, and Lantzville. Read the full article by Katrina Eñano in the Canadian
Lawyer.
BC Supreme Court Awards Damages
for an Improperly Filed Lien
Under the British Columbia Builders Lien Act, a contractor may
be liable to an owner for the wrongful filing of a claim of
lien, but there have been very few cases where this remedy has
been awarded. In a recent case, the BC Supreme Court ordered a
contractor to pay an owner's costs and damages suffered as a
result of a lien that was filed after the 45-day time limit set
out in the Act. Read the full article by Edward Hulshof and Karen
Martin with Dentons.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Residential Tenancy Act |
July 11/22 |
by 2018 Bill 12, c. 11, section 8 only (in force by Reg 171/2022), Tenancy Statutes Amendment Act, 2018 |
Residential Tenancy Regulation (477/2003) |
July 11/22 |
by Reg 171/2022 |
WILLS
& ESTATES |
Wills and Estates News:
B.C. Case Comment: Will Varied to Give Disinherited
Adult Child 30% of Father's Estate
The B.C. Supreme Court recently considered a classic wills
variation scenario: an adult independent child from a
deceased's earlier relationship seeks to vary their parent's
will, which makes no provision for them, and instead provides
for their second spouse. It is very common to see wills
variation claims in blended families.
In Pascuzzi v. Pascuzzi 2022 BCSC 907, the plaintiff was 32 years
old when her father died. Her parents had a short relationship,
which ended before the plaintiff was born. A few years later,
the deceased met the person who would later become his wife,
and he remained married to her until his death. He had two
children with her, and she had two children from a prior
relationship. Read the full article by James Zaitsoff, published on the BC
Estate Litigation Blog.
Marriage-Like Relationships and Intestate Succession
in BC: Coad v. Lariviere [2022 BCCA 222]
Pursuant to British Columbia's Wills, Estates and Succession Act,
S.B.C. 2009, c. 13 ("WESA"), when a person dies without a will,
that person's surviving spouse is entitled to inherit either
the entirety of the estate (if there are no descendants) or a
preferential share of it (if there are descendants). Section 2
of WESA defines two persons as "spouses" if they were married
to each other, or if "they had lived with each other in a
marriage-like relationship for at least 2 years." What
constitutes a "marriage-like relationship" however is not
defined in WESA. Fortunately, a recent decision by the British
Columbia Court of Appeal has gone a long way to clarify the
threshold requirement to be considered a spouse in a
marriage-like relationship. Read the full article by Alexander Swabuk and Taylor Lanthier with Miller Thomson LLP.
Evidence of Statements Made by the
Deceased in Estate Litigation
One would be hard-pressed to find estate litigation cases in
which there is no evidence about something the deceased said.
In many cases, such evidence determines the outcome. Yet,
evidence of out-of-court statements raise hearsay concerns. The
deceased obviously cannot be cross examined (at least not in
this world). When should such evidence be admitted? And when
should it be rejected as hearsay? What follows is a brief
discussion about the admissibility and weight of evidence of
what the deceased said in estate litigation cases. Read the full article by Stan Rule, published in The Verdict.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
There
were no amendments this month. |
The content of this document is intended
for client use only. Redistribution to anyone other than
Quickscribe clients (without the prior written consent of
Quickscribe) is strictly prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD.
DISCLAIMER
The Reporter includes articles that should be used for
information and educational purposes only and are not intended
to be a source of legal advice. Please consult with a lawyer
before choosing to act on any information included in the
Reporter. The content in each article is owned by its
respective author.
UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE
To unsubscribe from this service, click here. |