COMPANY
& FINANCE |
Company and Finance News:
The Shifting Onus of Proof under
Section 171 of the Securities Act
Section 171 of the Securities Act (the "Act") is a
powerful provision that provides the British Columbia
Securities Commission (the "Commission") with the discretion to
make an order revoking or varying a decision the Commission or
Executive Director has made under the Act – as long as it
is not prejudicial to the public interest. In most instances,
this means the affected party, or applicant, bears the onus of
proving to the Commission that new evidence or a significant
change in circumstances exist that warrants a change in
decision. However, in light of the Commission's recent expanded
powers, applicants have sought to shift the onus of proof to
the Commission itself to demonstrate why their decision should
continue to be upheld in support of the public interest. Read
the full article by Dennis Whincup with Whitelaw Twining LLP.
Canada: Tax Directors Beware – Canadian Downward
Transfer Pricing Adjustment MustBe Challenged
at the Federal Court, Not the Tax Court
The two decisions rendered in the context of the Dow Chemical
Canada ULC ("Dow Canada") litigation warrant consideration. Not
only are they of interest to tax litigators and academics; the
decisions are also of practical importance to tax directors.
This is so because a downward transfer pricing adjustment will
need to be challenged independently at the Federal Court by way
of judicial review, and not at the Tax Court of Canada ("TCC")
in the context of a normal tax appeal. Read the full article by Jacques Bernier and
Oluwaseun Senbore with with Baker McKenzie LLP.
Amendments To the Canada Business Corporations
Act
Impact Public Companies
The Canada Business Corporations Act
("CBCA") was amended effective August 31, 2022 to require
shareholders of a public company governed by such legislation
to vote "for" or "against" directors at annual meetings of
shareholders. This is a departure from the "for" and "withhold"
options previously offered to CBCA public company shareholders.
Subject to certain exceptions, the amendments also contemplate
that each director in an uncontested election (i.e., where the
number of director nominees is equal to the number of directors
positions to be filled) must receive more "for" votes than
"against" votes to be elected. Read the full article by Keith Inman of Pushor Mitchell LLP.
British Columbia Conducts Consultation on Restricted
Licence Regime for Incidental Sellers of Insurance
British Columbia's Ministry of Finance is conducting a
consultation on the adoption of its proposed restricted
insurance agent licensing regime for incidental sellers of
insurance. The proposal is similar to what is already in place
in the other three western provinces (and, soon, in New
Brunswick) but BC is signalling that it may consider including
additional industries and additional flexibility in its regime.
BC businesses that see opportunities in this area should
therefore consider submitting comments, which are due on
October 3, 2022.
The licensing of restricted insurance agents is provided for
in s. 174.1 of BC's Financial Institutions Amendment Act,
2019, which will be proclaimed in force once
details of the restricted licence regime have been finalized.
Read the full article by Stuart S. Carruthers and Andrew S. Cunningham with Stikeman
Elliott LLP.
Draft Federal Tax Legislation Package Released
On August 9, 2022, the Canadian federal government released a
package of draft legislation to implement various tax measures,
update certain previously released draft legislation, and make
certain technical changes (Proposal). The draft legislation
includes measures first announced in the 2022 Federal Budget,
with updated versions of draft legislation released earlier
this year, including the mandatory disclosure rules released in
February 2022. The news release that accompanied the
Proposal invites Canadians to make submissions with respect to
the Proposal by September 30, 2022.
The federal government also opened a consultation on potential changes to
Canada's General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR), first proposed in
the 2020 Fall Economic Statement, and released an accompanying
consultation paper. Submissions for the
consultation will be accepted until September 30, 2022. Read
the full article published by Osler, Hoskin
& Harcourt LLP.
Slow, Unprofessional Tactics Not Enough to Revoke
Securities Investigation Order: BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that the onus to
prove that public interest will not be prejudiced by the
revocation of an investigation order issued under the Securities Act lies on the party
pushing for the revocation.
In Morabito v. British Columbia (Securities Commission),
2022 BCCA 279, Mark Morabito was
executive chairman of Canada Jetlines Ltd. (Jetlines), which
came into being as a result of a reverse takeover transaction.
Read the full article by Jason Tan on the Canadian Lawyer.
No Abuse of Process in Ban of Securities Officer
Involved in
Market Manipulation: BC Court of Appeal
A decision to ban a litigant from acting as officer of an
exchange-listed company was made to protect public interest and
was not an abuse of process, the British Columbia Court of
Appeal has ruled.
In Lower v. Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
of Canada, 2022 BCCA 285, Scott Lower was working as
a registered representative in the securities industry with a
Vancouver-based brokerage firm when the Investment Industry
Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) began an
investigation of his alleged involvement in market manipulation
and the payment of secret commissions. At the time of the
investigation in 2008, Lower was subject to the regulatory
supervision of IIROC. Read the full article by Angelico Dino on Canadian Lawyer.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax Regulation (93/2013) |
Aug. 1/22 |
by Reg 47/2022 and Reg 142/2022 |
Judicial Officers (Legal Proceedings) Indemnity Regulation
(162/2022) |
Aug. 31/22 |
by Reg 182/2022 |
National Instrument 94-101 Mandatory Central Counterparty
Clearing of Derivatives (129/2017) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 104/2022 |
Provincial Sales Tax Regulation (96/2013) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 154/2022 |
ENERGY
& MINES |
Energy and Mines News:
Adjusting to BC's Increased Reclamation
Bonding Requirements
The BC government is increasing its reclamation bonding
requirements from mining operations. On April 8th, 2022, BC
published a new interim Major Mines Reclamation Security Policy
(the "interim policy"). Among other things, the interim policy
seeks to reduce the difference between the mining sector's
reclamation liabilities and the reclamation security held by
the Province.
Background to the Policy:
Recommendations and Examinations in
BC's Security Reclamation Practice
The interim policy was developed in response to recommendations
following a 2016 audit of compliance and enforcement in the BC
mining sector. The audit report found that the Ministry of
Energy and Mines was not holding enough security ($0.9 billion
at the time) to cover the estimated environmental liabilities
at major mines ($2.1 billion at the time). The Auditor General
recommended that the "…government safeguard taxpayers by
ensuring the reclamation liability estimate is accurate and
that the security held by government is sufficient to cover
potential costs."
Read the full article by Christopher Langdon,
Patrick Deutscher and Dave Nikolesjsin with McCarthy
Tétrault LLP.
Mining in the Courts – Case Law Summary
In this series of blogs, we will share one of our case law
summaries. In Kaban Resources Inc. v. Goldcorp Inc.,
2021 BCCA 427, the British Columbia Court
of Appeal confirmed that a mining company had no legal duty to
consent to a proposed financing arrangement that differed
materially from the terms of a letter agreement.
Goldcorp Inc. (now Newmont Corp.) and two of its subsidiaries
(Goldcorp) brought a summary trial application for an order
dismissing a claim by Kaban Resources Inc. (Kaban) alleging
breach of contract. The claim arose in the context of a
proposed sale of Goldcorp's rights to the Cerro Blanco
gold-silver mine in Guatemala and certain other assets. In
February 2016, Goldcorp and Kaban signed a letter agreement
providing that Goldcorp would transfer these rights to Kaban in
exchange for a 40% interest in Kaban, a cash payment 12 months
after commercial production, piggyback rights on an initial
public offering of Kaban, and other consideration. This
agreement was subject to Kaban raising C$35 million in
financing. Read the full article by McCarthy Tétrault
LLP's mining litigation group.
Finance Releases Draft Legislation on the Critical
MineralExploration
Tax Credit but "Critical" Details Remain Outstanding
On August 9, 2022, the Department of Finance released draft
legislation (Draft Legislation) to implement the 30 percent
Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit (CMETC) that was
introduced on April 7, 2022 (Budget Day).1 While the structure
of the CMETC Draft Legislation is generally similar to the
framework under the existing 15 percent Mineral Exploration Tax
Credit (METC), there are a number of new requirements that must
be satisfied in order to qualify for the CMETC.
Although the Draft Legislation states that the CMETC will
apply to expenditures renounced under eligible flow-through
share agreements entered into after Budget Day (and on or
before March 31, 2027), mining companies planning to undertake
flow-through share financings in 2022 that may be eligible for
the CMETC should seek guidance on these new requirements as
important details are still missing from the Draft Legislation.
Read the full article by Zahra Nurmohamed, Tera Li Parizeau and Neil Burnside with Cassels Brock &
Blackwell LLP.
Environmental Appeal Board Upholds Mt. Polley Mine
Copper Concentration Discharge Target
Imperial Metals has lost an appeal of a BC environment ministry
decision to set a target lowering the copper concentration of
treated wastewater from the Mt. Polley gold and copper mine.
The mine was allowed to begin to discharge treated wastewater
directly into Quesnel Lake in the BC Interior after it started
up two years after the catastrophic collapse of a
rock-and-earth dam in 2014. The mine is permitted to discharge
wastewater from the treatment plant at a copper concentration
of 33 micrograms per litre, but the B.C. environment ministry
has also stipulated that treatment of wastewater should target
a significantly reduced copper concentration of 12 micrograms
per litre. Read the full article by Gordon Hoekstra published on the Vancouver
Sun.
New BCOGC Security Program Requirements
June 1, 2023 – Early Consolidation
Effective June 1, 2023, the new Security Management Regulation
will come into force, requiring permit holders regulated by the
BC Oil and Gas Commission to comply with CSA Standard Z246.1.
This regulation requires permit holders to develop a Security
Management Program to identify threats and risks on a
continuing basis and manage them with appropriate mitigation
and response measures. For your convenience, Quickscribe has
published an early consolidation of this
regulation.
BC Minerals Could be Key Contributors to
Hitting Climate Goals
Here in BC, we've witnessed firsthand the devastating effects
of climate change: ice storms, floods, heat domes, atmospheric
rivers and wildfires have devastated communities. Meanwhile,
Europe and the United Kingdom are recovering from an
unprecedented heatwave. What does this have to do with mining?
It's simple. The world must rapidly build clean energy
infrastructure to confront climate change. This means building
more wind turbines and solar farms and improving our
electricity grids. It means transitioning to electric vehicles
(EVs) and building batteries and charging infrastructure to
support them. Foresight Canada and the Mining Association of BC
(MABC) held a contest, the Mining Innovation Challenge, aimed
at finding ways to reduce the use of water in mining
operations. Mines use large amounts of fresh water to move mine
waste (slurry), which must be stored in tailings ponds. Read
the full article by Michael Goehring,
published by BIV.
Recent BCOGC Bulletins
The BCOGC has recently issued the following bulletins:
- IB 2022-02 – Multi-Year Study to
Look at Methane Emissions
- INDB 2022-13 – Participants
Sought for Testing Well Decommissioning Submissions
Visit the BCOGC website to view this and other
bulletins.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Petroleum and Natural Gas Royalty and Freehold Production Tax
Regulation (495/92) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 117/2022 |
FAMILY
& CHILDREN |
Family and Children News:
Parentage Committee Starts Discussion on
Surrogacy and Independent Legal Advice
This month, the Parentage
Law Reform Project Committee focused on two
issues: surrogacy and independent legal advice.
Should conception by sexual intercourse be
permitted for traditional surrogacy?
Section
29 of the Family Law Act governs
surrogacy. Surrogacy is when a person carries a child for
someone else. There are two kinds of surrogacy. The first is
'traditional' surrogacy. In this case, the surrogate carries
the child, but also donates an egg (i.e., is genetically
related to the child). The second is 'gestational' surrogacy.
In this case, the surrogate carries the child but is not
genetically related.
Read the full article by Alison Wilkinson of BCLI.
Hearing Begins Challenging BC Government's Stance on
Legal Aid for Low-income Women
A three-day hearing has begun in B.C. Supreme Court, with a
group challenging the provincial government's stance that it
doesn't have the capacity to take a case regarding legal aid to
trial. The Single Mothers Alliance launched the constitutional
case five years ago saying eligibility for legal aid doesn't
meet the needs of low-income women, especially those escaping
domestic violence. The alliance is being represented by
West Coast Leaf, whose executive director says eligibility
requirements are problematic because single mothers must earn
about $29,000 for a two-person household to qualify for legal
aid. Read the full article published by the Vancouver
Sun.
In "A Case about Everything the Parties Did Wrong to
Achieve a
Particular Goal," Ontario Court Illustrates the Differences
between Guardianship and Parentage
Jacobs v Blair, 2022 ONSC 3159, was a case involving a
dispute between two couples over the parentage and guardianship
(which consists of, in the words of Ontario's legislation,
"decision-making responsibility, parenting time, contact and
guardianship with respect to children") of a young child. The
case illustrates some fundamental differences between parentage
and guardianship
of children in Canadian family law. While parentage of children
conceived by sexual intercourse is (in the lion's share of
cases) determined by biological connections, courts resolve
disputes over the guardianship of a child by applying the
best-interests-of-the-child test. In this case, a couple who
had cared for the child since birth were ordered to be the
child's guardians, even though they weren't the child's
biological parents. Read the full article by Kevin Zakreski with BCLI.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
There
were no amendments this month. |
FOREST
& ENVIRONMENT |
Forest and
Environment News:
British Columbia's Carbon Credit System
Under the Climate Change Accountability Act,
SBC 2007, c 42, the province of British Columbia (BC) set
certain greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets. One
initiative for meeting these climate change goals is the carbon
credit system governed by the Greenhouse Gas Industrial Reporting and
Control Act, SBC 2014, c 29 (GGIRCA). It
establishes GHG emissions reporting requirements, allows for
the creation of emission standards applicable to industrial
facilities, and allows for the adherence to emissions standards
through earning or purchasing emissions offsets and/or credits
or purchasing government-generated credits.
So long as GGIRCA meets or exceeds federal carbon pricing
standards as outlined in the Canadian Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit
System Regulations, SOR/2022-111 and the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act,
SC 2018, c 12, BC's system will likely remain independent from
the federally legislated Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit System.
Read the full article by Courtney Burton, with the
assistance of Jack Yuan (law student) with Dentons LLP.
WorkSafeBC Update – Proposed Improvements to the
Certificate of Recognition Program
WorkSafeBC is proceeding with the next step in its gradual,
phased implementation of proposed improvements to the
Certificate of Recognition (COR) program after extensive
consultation, research, development, and testing of a new
health and safety management audit standard. Read the full article on BC Forest Safety.
Pilot Program Aims to Turn "Dead Wood" into
Lumber
Deadwood Innovations, of Fort St. James, in a joint
venture with the Nak'azdli Whut'en First Nation, has a unique,
pilot-scale mill based in the former Tl'Oh Forest Products mill
in the northern B.C. community. The BC government is working
with the group to fund the development of a commercial-scale
plant that, proponents say, could turn waste wood into
commercial lumber. A key source for the wood is the thousands
of trees killed by the mountain pine beetle, which caused the
closure of the Tl'Oh mill in 2014. Read the BIV article.
Pre-treaty Agreement Returns Land to
BC First Nation in Campbell River
A Campbell River First Nation has signed a pre-treaty agreement
that would see the return of more than 22 square kilometres of
land — a "significant milestone," says its chief, in a
treaty negotiation process that has taken more than two
decades. The transfer of 2,276 hectares of territorial land on
the east coast of Vancouver Island to the Wei Wai Kum will help
boost its economic activities for its 850 members, allowing
them to access the land for cultural activities and reap the
benefits of the forestry harvest. Read the full article by Cheryl Chan with the Vancouver
Sun.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made
recently:
Environmental Management Act
Water Sustainability Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
Forest Appeals Commission Decisions
The following Forest Appeals Commission decision was made
recently.
Forest and Range Practices Act
Visit the Forest Appeals Commission website for more information.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment Information |
Agrologists Regulation (10/2021) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 239/2021 |
Applied Biologists Regulation (13/2021) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 239/2021 |
Wildlife Act |
Sept. 1/22 |
by 2022 Bill 14, c. 13, sections 1 to 4 only (in force by Royal
Assent), Wildlife Amendment Act, 2022 |
HEALTH |
Health News:
Re-envisioning Health Care in BC
BC communities are experiencing unprecedented challenges with
the health care system, which include the closure of emergency
rooms, long wait times for surgery, difficulties in finding a
family physician, problems with the recruitment and retention
of health care professionals, and inconsistent access to
ambulance service. The plenary policy session at UBCM's 2022
convention will explore the impacts of these challenges on
communities and consider ideas for transforming B.C.'s health
care system. The panellists for this session will include
Adrian Dix, Minister of Health. The session will be held
Tuesday, September 13, 2022, from 1:30 PM – 3:15 PM. Read
the full UBCM article.
Delay in Follow-up Care Prolonged Patient's Suffering
but
Didn't Worsen Injury: BC Court of Appeal
A doctor's negligence in providing follow-up care prolonged a
patient's suffering by delaying a hip replacement, but it
didn't worsen the injury to the point of liability for costs of
future care, the British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled.
In Hicks v. Belknap, 2022 BCCA 292, Leona Belknap fractured
her hip in 2014. Dr. Tracy Hicks attended to her injury, With
Belknap's consent, he performed internal reduction and fixation
surgery to repair the hip instead of replacing all or part of
it. Belknap nevertheless underwent a total hip arthroplasty two
years later in 2016. Read the full article by Jason Tan in the Canadian Lawyer.
Canada Introduces Regulatory Framework
for Supplemented Foods
Recently, the federal government introduced a Regulatory framework for supplemented foods
via amendments (the "Amendments") to the Food and Drug Regulations (FDR) (the
"Regulations"). The framework establishes maximum amounts per
serving for supplemental ingredients, prescribes cautionary
statements and caution identifiers to be placed on the labels
of supplemented foods, and requires display of a Supplemented
Food Facts Table. Read the full article by Ingrid E. VanderElst,
PhD, Dara Jospé and Eric Saragosa with Fasken.
COVID-mandate Lawsuit Tossed for
Being "Bad beyond Argument"
A highly-publicized lawsuit targeting the provincial
government's COVID-19 measures has been thrown out by a BC
Supreme Court Justice for being so poorly crafted it is
impossible to respond to. The lawsuit by plaintiffs
Action4Canada, ten named individuals, three Jane Does and two
corporations was filed by Rocco Galati of the Constitutional
Rights Centre. The rambling 391-page lawsuit puts forward a
greatest-hits of COVID-19 conspiracy claims, ranging from
vaccine microchipping to allegations that the pandemic was
pre-planned by the World Health Organization along with Bill
Gates and others to install a New World Order. Read the full BIV
article.
BC Announces $118 Million for Family Doctors
to Cover Overhead Costs
Family doctors say the $118 million in short-term emergency
funding to cover overhead costs announced Wednesday [August 24]
by the province is a good first step but won't help the one
million British Columbians without a physician. Health Minister
Adrian Dix and the Doctors of BC said the funding of up to
$25,000 per doctor is a direct response to family physicians
across the province who have said they've closed their practice
because the long hours, rising overhead and administration
costs make the profession unsustainable. Read the Vancouver
Sun article.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Accessible British Columbia Act |
Sept. 1/22 |
by 2021 Bill 6, c. 19, sections 11 and 12 (in force by Reg 105/2022), Accessible British Columbia Act |
Dental Hygienists Regulation (276/2008) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 172/2022 |
Dental Technicians Regulation (32/2020) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 172/2022 |
Dentists Regulation (415/2008) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 172/2022 |
Denturists Regulation (277/2008) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 172/2022 |
LABOUR
& EMPLOYMENT |
Labour and Employment News:
A Narrow Job Search Can Be a Failure to Mitigate
A recent BC Supreme Court case highlights how employees
have an obligation to mitigate their damages by searching for
comparable employment after termination. The case also confirms
that 24-months is the upper limit of common law reasonable
notice in BC.
Facts
In Okano v. Cathay Pacific Airways Limited, 2022 BCSC 881, the plaintiff, Ms. Okano,
was 61 years old and had been employed by the defendant airline
for almost 35 years, rising through the ranks to manager of the
Cathay Pacific's Vancouver office. She was the most senior
person in her department, and oversaw a group of 71 employees.
Read the full article by Neal Parker of Harper
Grey LLP.
LaFleche v. NLFD Auto: Managing Employee's
Return to Work is Employer's Responsibility
The recent decision of LaFleche v. NLFD Auto dba Prince
George Ford (No. 2), 2022 BCHRT 88, highlights the careful
approach that employers should take when employees are
returning to work after a leave of absence.
In this case, involving an employee seeking to return to work
after her maternity leave, the British Columbia Human Rights
Tribunal (the "Tribunal") found that the employer had
discriminated against her on the basis of sex and family
status, contrary to section 13 of the British Columbia Human
Rights Code (the "Code") and had constructively
dismissed the employee by continuing to employ her replacement,
failing to return her to her past position, and failing to
communicate with her about her return to work. Read the full article by Laura DeVries and Nico
Rullmann of McCarthy Tétrault.
New Accessibility Requirements for the BC Public
Sector
Is your organization on the right track toward
accessibility, diversity and inclusion? As of June 2021, the Accessible British Columbia Act
(the "Act") is law in British Columbia. The Act's intent is to
make the province more inclusive, including for persons with
disabilities.
Earlier this year, the government released the first
regulation under the Act, the Accessible British Columbia Regulation
(the "Regulation"). The Regulation identifies the public sector
organizations that have to comply with the Act's accessibility
requirements. As of September 1, 2022, certain accessibility
requirements in the Act will apply to these covered
organizations. Read the full article by Cory Sully and Ryan Berger with Lawson Lundell LLP.
Types of Background Checks and Legal Considerations
When hiring, it is understandable that employers want
to know certain important information about the background of
candidates, such as their criminal, work or credit history.
However, it is important that those hiring in British Columbia
follow employment laws and, in particular, anti-discrimination
regulations when conducting these background checks. The good
news is that background checks are legal in Canada, but
certain criteria must still be met for them to be acceptable.
Read the full article published by Overholt Law
LLP.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (296/97) |
Aug. 22/22 |
by Reg 116/2022 |
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT |
Local Government News:
BC Supreme Court Quashes Vancouver
Rent Control Bylaws
The BC Supreme Court recently considered the City of
Vancouver's pioneering attempt to impose rent controls between
tenancies by bylaw in single room accommodations in the City.
Council passed these rent control Bylaws as part of its efforts
to improve housing affordability and accessibility within the
City, especially for low-income tenants. Two property owners
challenged the Bylaws by arguing that the City did not have
jurisdiction to pass such a regulation, given the existence of
the provincial Residential Tenancy Act ("RTA")
scheme. Read the full article by Elizabeth Anderson of
Young Anderson Barristers & Solicitors.
No Economic Damages from Abandonment of Subdivision
Due to Conditions: BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that conditions
placed on land subdivision because of a Regional District
building officer's input raises no reasonable cause of action
by the applicants.
In Kamoto Holdings Ltd. v. Central Kootenay (Regional
District), 2022 BCCA 282, Gordon and Jill Cann
applied to subdivide their property in the Village of Nakusp.
The approving officer sent a subdivision plan to the Regional
District of Central Kootenay for comment. A building inspector
from the district found several issues, such as infringement of
fire safety provisions of the Building Code, which led to the
approving officer placing conditions on subdivision. Read the full article by Jason Tan in the Canadian Lawyer.
Special Committee to Review the Freedom of
Information and
Protection of Privacy Act: Transparency,
Modernization and Risk Management
The British Columbia provincial government tabled a series of
significant amendments to the Freedom of Information and Protection of
Privacy Act (the "Act") that received royal assent
on November 25, 2021 and which were intended to update this
legislation to keep pace with technological and structural
changes in the ways that public bodies in the province interact
with and handle information. Read the full article by David Giroday of Civic Legal LLP.
New Procurement Trade Requirements for Local
Governments
from UBCM:
New Procurement Trade requirements will come into force
effective September 23, 2022. The Province has been working
with the Federal government to meet BC's trade reporting
obligations under the Comprehensive European Trade Agreement (CETA).
Read the UBCM article.
Canadian Municipalities Increasingly Support Climate
Change Litigation Against Oil and Gas Companies
Vancouver City Council recently passed a motion to fund a
proposed class action against various oil and gas companies to
recover costs associated with climate change.
The motion follows a growing international trend whereby local
governments (particularly in the United States and Europe) are
commencing litigation seeking to hold fossil fuel companies
responsible for the costs associated with climate change. We
examined one such lawsuit brought by the City of Baltimore in
our insight Win for American Energy Companies Facing
Climate Change Litigation. By contrast, Canadian
climate change litigation is still in its early stages, as
discussed in our previous insights: Are Climate Change Claims Based on Charter
Rights Justiciable? Canadian Courts Render Conflicting
Decisionsand Climate Change Litigation Comes to Canada.
Read the full article by Laura M. Gill, Michael P.
Theroux, Cheryl M. Wooding and Rebecca Taylor with Bennett
Jones LLP.
Bylaw Adjudication Program Update
from UBCM:
The Province has issued a memorandum
advising local governments that, effective October 3, 2022, the
Ministry of Attorney General's Tribunals, Transformation and
Independent Offices Division (TTIOD) will assume all
responsibilities for the Bylaw Adjudication Program.
Previously, duties were shared with the Court Services Branch.
Read the UBCM article.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Agricultural Land Reserve Use Regulation (30/2019) |
Aug. 31/22 |
by Reg 36/2022 |
Private Training Regulation (153/2016) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 122/2021 and Reg 217/2021 |
MISCELLANEOUS
|
Miscellaneous News:
BC Supreme Court Considers the Insurance Act's
Dispute Resolution Process
In King v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2022 BCSC 973, the BC Supreme Court (the
"Court") held that Ms. Paula King (the "Insured") could not opt
out of the mandatory dispute resolution process ("DRP") she had
commenced pursuant to section 12 of the Insurance Act, RSBC 2012, c 1
(the "Act"). Specifically, the Court dismissed the Insured's
application to terminate the DRP and transfer the proceeding to
the Court. Read the full article by Caitlin VanDuzer and Baljinder Bains with Miller Thomson
LLP.
How the West is Liened: A Comparison of Builders Lien
Legislation in British Columbia and Alberta
Every Canadian province and territory has its own builders lien
act meant to ensure that contractors and workers who contribute
to improvements on land are paid for their services and
materials. These acts are complex and can cause confusion,
particularly where construction companies do business in
multiple provinces.
On August 29, 2022, Alberta is set to introduce the Prompt
Payment and Construction Lien Act (the PPCLA). This new
act will amend some of the builders lien rules that
stakeholders in the construction industry have become
accustomed to while working in Western Canada.
In this article, we set out some of the key differences
between the British Columbia Builders Lien Act (the BC BLA)
and Alberta's new PPCLA. Read the full article by Karen Martin, Q.C., Alex Barr-Gusa and Chelsea A. Wilson with Dentons.
Using Contempt to Force Party into "Discussion" Is
Professional Misconduct: BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld a ruling that a
lawyer committed professional misconduct when he refused to
correct a draft order despite a judge's memorandum and
transcript showing corrections and filed a contempt proceeding
against another lawyer to force a discussion about her
complaint against him.
In McLeod v. Law Society of British Columbia, 2022 BCCA 280, the Law Society of British
Columbia's discipline committee issued a citation against
lawyer Donald McLeod over several acts amounting to
professional misconduct. The complainant was an opposing
counsel in a pension division case. Read the full article by Jason Tan in the Canadian Lawyer.
BC First Nations to Decide Fate of
Open Net-Pen Feedlots
Three First Nations in British Columbia will decide the fate of
feedlots operating in their territories later this year –
only months after learning the Department of Fisheries and
Oceans (DFO) suppressed research into a virus threatening wild
salmon populations. Read the full article published by MLT Aikins.
Case Comment: Procedural Requirements for
Relief under the Builders Lien Act
We have previously reported on decisions that have been
released by our courts this summer regarding the importance for
lien claimants to follow proper procedure when seeking to
assert a builders lien claim for unpaid materials and services
provided to an improvement. The recent decision of the BC
Supreme Court Metro-Can Construction (PE) Ltd. v. Escobar
et al., 2022 BCSC 1042 gives a reminder that it
is just as important for owners and general contractors to
strictly follow the provisions of the Builders Lien Act when seeking
relief such as discharge of a lien or discharge of liability.
Read the full article by Rosalie A. Clark with Clark Wilson LLP.
Practic Direction 62 –Sealed Bid Process for
Foreclosures and
Other Matters Involving Sales of Land
August 12, 2022: Chief Justice Hinkson has issued Practice Direction 62 – Sealed Bid
Process for Foreclosures and Other Matters Involving Sales
of Land and has rescinded COVID-19 Notice No.
31. This Practice Direction sets out the process for submitting
sealed bids to the Court for foreclosures and other matters
involving the sale of land. Seller's counsel is responsible for
providing this Practice Direction to the listing agent for
distribution to any interested buyers. Please be reminded that,
effective August 15, 2022, the Court will be returning to
hearing chambers matters in person, unless the Court otherwise
orders or directs. Please see COVID Notice No. 50 for more
information.
Credit Unions Retain 5-dollar Overdraft Fee, Must
Return
Amount over Legal Limit: BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has found that a lower
court should have reduced a credit union's overdraft charges
per transaction to be in line with the Criminal Code limit.
In Community Savings Credit Union v. Bodnar, 2022 BCCA 263, the defendant credit
unions imposed overdraft fees that exceeded $5 per transaction
until 2003. At the time, they did not know about s. 347 of the Criminal Code,
which considered credit union overdraft charges exceeding $5
per transaction to be interest. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino with the Canadian
Lawyer.
Lawsuit of the Week: Jehovah's Witnesses Ramp Up
Court Battle with BC's Privacy Commissioner
A pair of congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses is taking the
Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia to
court, claiming an order to release confidential religious
records under the Personal Information Protection Act
(PIPA) is unconstitutional.
In a petition filed on August 2 in BC Supreme Court, the
Coldstream and Grand Forks Congregations of Jehovah's
Witnesses, the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Canada
and elders John Vaboulas and Paul Sidhu, claim the commissioner
wrongfully ordered disclosure of records related to requests
made under PIPA by two former adherents to the faith,
respondents Gabriel-Liberty Wall and Gregory Westgarde. Read
the BIV article.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective
Date |
Amendment
Information |
Accident Claims Regulation (233/2018) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 147/2022 |
Civil Resolution Tribunal Act |
Sept. 1/22 |
by 2022 Bill 9, c. 6, sections 2, 5, 9 and 11 to 14 only (in
force by Reg 147/2022), Attorney General Statutes Amendment Act, 2022 |
MOTOR
VEHICLE & TRAFFIC |
Motor Vehicle and Traffic
News:
Roadside Breath Demand Refusal Not Excused by
Interference
of Right to Counsel: BC Court of Appeal
Interference by police of the right to counsel is not
reasonable excuse to refuse to comply with a formal roadside
breath demand, the British Columbia Court of appeal has ruled.
In Gordon v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor
Vehicles), 2022 BCCA 260, Jason Gordon was arrested
by the Vancouver Police Department. Gordon was unsteady on his
feet and his breath smelled of alcohol. Upon arrest, Gordon
invoked his Charter 10(b) rights and said he wanted
to speak to a lawyer. Read the full article by Jason Tan in the Canadian Lawyer.
Ton Containers for the Transportation of
Dangerous Goods (CAN/CGSB-43.149)
The Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) has released the
draft of Safety Standard CAN/CGSB-43.149 for a 60-day
consultation period. Safety standard CAN/CGSB-43.149 sets out
the requirements for designing, manufacturing, maintaining,
qualifying, inspecting, marking, selecting, and using ton
containers. The standard also lays out the requirements for the
quality management system and its applicability, and the
registration of facilities performing manufacture, inspection,
maintenance, or qualification of ton containers. Visit
Transport Canada's webpage for more information.
EV, Hydrogen Retrofits in BC Offer Alternate
Route to Emissions Reduction
New business models aim to get more zero-emission vehicles on
the road in BC. As British Columbians were fuelling up with
pricey petrol and taking to the roads for August holidays, the
province kicked off the month boosting rebates up to $1,000 for
zero-emissions vehicles (ZEV). The heightened effort to
encourage ZEV purchases comes as both the province and Ottawa
have mandated 100 per cent of new passenger vehicle sales to be
ZEVs by 2035.
But the future for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs)
remains less settled as private industry faces exponentially
higher costs transitioning to ZEVs. Rather than investing in
new MHDVs, a growing number of BC companies are pushing
organizations to consider retrofitting fleets to help meet
emissions targets. Read the full article by Tyler Orton with BIV.
Out-of-court Statements Must Be Necessary and
Reliable to Be Admissible: BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ordered a new trial
for a personal injury action because the lower court judge
improperly assessed the reliability of an out-of-court
statement made by a witness.
In Davis v. Jeyaratnam, 2022 BCCA 273, Garett Davis, a
professional mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter, was riding his
bicycle along Broadway in Vancouver when he collided with a
vehicle driven by Navaratnaraja Jeyaratnam. Davis strongly
denied that he had been cycling on the sidewalk, as prohibited
by the Motor Vehicle Act. Jeyaratnam,
on the other hand, denied having struck Davis. Read the full article by Angelico Dino with Canadian Lawyer.
CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following documents were posted recently by CVSE:
For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.
Passenger Transportation Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC
Passenger Transportation Board:
Industry Updates & Advisories
- Final Deadline to Activate Additional
Taxis
The Board is issuing a final activation deadline of December
31, 2022. Licensees will have until this date to activate
additional vehicles, or they will no longer be valid.
- Vancouver Cruise Ship Schedule for TNS and Taxi
Operators
As the 2022 cruise season commences in Vancouver, TNS and
Taxi Licensees are reminded to review their terms and conditions of
licence and the cruise schedule. The Board will
continue its efforts to ensure that any changes or amendments
are posted in the Weekly Bulletin and on the website.
- TOPs Processing Reminder
With grad and summer fast approaching, licensees planning to
apply for a Temporary Operating Permit (TOP) should do so
well in advance and not wait until the day before or the day
of the requested TOP start date. Processing cannot be
guaranteed in this short a time period. To learn more about
TOPs (including Peak Season and Regular), please see Reference Sheet 17.
Applications Received
- 15479-22 – OB Hotels GP Ltd. (Oak
Bay Beach Hotel)
- 15717-22 – Evergreen Taxi LTD.
- 15344-22 – Penticton Eco Taxi
Ltd.
- 15741-22 – Transfer from Wescan
Transport Inc. to Bluebird Cabs, Ltd.
Application Decisions
Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date
|
Amendment Information |
Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation (447/83) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 147/2022 |
Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicles Regulation (25/2015) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 180/2022 |
Passenger Transportation Act |
Sept. 1/22 |
by 2022 Bill 13, c. 10, sections 1 to 5 only (in force by Reg 168/2022), Passenger Transportation Amendment Act, 2022 |
Passenger Transportation Regulation (266/2004) |
Sept. 1/22 |
by Reg 168/2022 |
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY |
Occupational Health & Safety
News:
New Rules for Work Refusals in BC Take Effect
A new rule strengthening the rights of workers in British
Columbia to refuse unsafe work has come into effect. The new section 3.12.1 under the Occupational
Health and Safety Regulation (OHSR) states that if a worker
refuses work, the employer must not require or permit another
worker to do the refused work unless the matter has been
resolved, or the employer informs the worker of the following:
- the refusal
- the unsafe work reported
- the reasons why the work would not create an undue hazard
to the health and safety of the other worker or any other
person
- the right of the other worker under section 3.12 to refuse
unsafe work
Read the full article by Jim Wilson with Canadian Occupational
Safety.
Workers' Compensation Schemes Cannot Recover Other
Benefits Paid to Claimants, Court Rules
In a straightforward ruling, with two sets of reasons
delivered, the Alberta Court of Appeal said that a statutory
interpretation of a section of Alberta's Insurance Act
does not preclude — in this case, WorkSafeBC — from
bringing a subrogated action against an estate to recover the
amounts of workers' compensation benefits paid to two
claimants. Read the full article by Christopher Guly on The
Lawyer's Daily.
Regulatory Amendment: A Primer on
Refusing Unsafe Work
Amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
took effect on August 22, 2022, including changes related to
refusing unsafe work. This primer outlines the changes, and
describes the requirement for employers to provide written
notice of the work refusal before allowing or permitting any
other workers to perform the refused work. Read the WorkSafe article.
WorkSafeBC Issues Orders after Attack that
Injured Workers in BC Psychiatric Hospital
WorkSafeBC has issued two orders to a psychiatric hospital in
British Columbia following an attack that left three workers
injured inside the workplace.
The incident happened last month, when one patient attacked
the workers at the Forensic Psychiatric Hospital in Coquitlam,
B.C. This happened inside the kitchen in a ward at the
facility. The incident left two workers with concussions and
one with back pain.
Nearly two-thirds (63 per cent) of healthcare workers experienced physical
violence, and 53 per cent reported an increase in
violence targeting them or a co-worker during the COVID-19
pandemic, according to a previous survey from the Canadian
Union of Public Employees (CUPE). Read the full article by Jim Wilson with Canadian Occupational
Safety.
Understanding Roles and Responsibilities in Workplace
Safety
When it comes to preventing workplace accidents in British
Columbia, a great deal of responsibility falls on employers.
Their policies as well as their follow-through will often be
thoroughly examined if a worker is hurt. However, they are not
the only ones with obligations when it comes to safety. Here is
a general overview of the responsibilities different parties carry to
keep a workplace safe. Read the full article published by Overholt Law
LLP.
OHS Policies/Guidelines – Updates
Guidelines – OHS Regulation:
August 22, 2022
The following guideline was revised, consequential to the
August 22 amendments to the OHS Regulation:
- Part 3 Rights and Responsibilities
Housekeeping changes were also made to the following
guidelines:
Policies – OHS Regulation:
August 22, 2022
Housekeeping changes were made to the following policy
items to reflect amendments to the OHS Regulation.
Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore previous
OHS updates.
|
Act or Regulation
Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
Accessible British Columbia Act |
Sept. 1/22 |
by 2021 Bill 6, c. 19, sections 11 and 12 (in force by Reg 105/2022), Accessible British Columbia Act |
Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (296/97) |
Aug. 22/22 |
by Reg 116/2022 |
PROPERTY
& REAL ESTATE |
Property and Real Estate News:
Property Law Amendment Act, 2022 –
In force January 2023 (Early Consolidation)
In March 2022, Bill 12, Property Law Amendment Act,
2022, was introduced. The bill amends the Property Law Act by protecting
residential homebuyers by giving them the right to rescind a
contract of purchase and sale by serving written notice to the
seller within 3 days after the offer is accepted. The intent of
this "cooling off period" is to provide homebuyers with peace
of mind and will allow time for the buyer to arrange an
inspection and secure funding. The new legislation will come
into force on January 1, 2023 by B.C. Reg 175/2022. For your convenience,
Quickscribe has published an early consolidation of the Property
Law Act as it will read when these changes come
into law. Note sections 42 and 43.
"Problematic" Order for Contribution to
Undefined
Future Expenses Set Aside by BC Court of Appeal
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has set aside an order
requiring the commercial section to contribute to undefined
future expenses of the Strata Corporation since the claim that
contribution was barred by contract or estoppel was not
addressed.
In Thurlow & Alberni Project Ltd. v. The Owners,
Strata Plan VR 2213, 2022 BCCA 257, the owners of a high-rise
building in Vancouver called Strata Plan VR 2213 (the Strata
Corporation) found deficiencies in the building's exterior
insulation and finish system (EIFS) that had been installed
about 30 years earlier. It sought to impose a special levy to
repair the deficiencies through a special resolution at its
2019 annual general meeting. Read the full article by Jason Tan in the Canadian Lawyer.
BC Man's Constitutional Challenge to
Property Tax Law Rejected
The B.C. Supreme Court has rejected an unusual constitutional
challenge that sought to invalidate the law that governs the
assessment of property values in the province. The challenge to
the Assessment Act came in the form
of three "stated cases" arising from appeals to the Property
Assessment Appeal Board by property owner Sheldon Goldberg.
The appeals involved three separate properties, located in
Vancouver, New Westminster and Surrey, respectively. Each one
ended with the appeal board confirming the assessed value after
rejecting requests from Goldberg for an in-person hearing and
for confirmation that board members had taken an oath of
impartiality, independence and honesty. Read CTV article.
Case Summary: Realtor's Appeal of
Suspension Backfires
Behroyan v. Ontario (Financial Services Tribunal),
[2022] B.C.J. No. 1285, 2022 BCSC 1190, British Columbia Supreme
Court, July 14, 2022, N.P. Kent J.
Mr. Behroyan, a real estate agent, brought a judicial review
of a decision of the Discipline Committee of the Financial
Services Tribunal (FST) imposing a penalty revoking his license
following findings of professional misconduct related to
misrepresentation, non-disclosure, deceptive dealing, among
other things.
The procedural history in this case is convoluted, involving
multiple decisions by both the Real Estate Council and the FST.
The original discipline and penalty decisions resulted in a
suspension of Mr. Behroyan's license for 12 months, a fine and
payment of enforcement costs. The Superintendent of Real Estate
filed an appeal of the penalty decision and Mr. Behroyan filed
an appeal of both discipline and penalty decisions. The appeals
were joined in a bifurcated hearing of the discipline matter
and the penalty matter. Read the full article by Roshni Veerapen of Harper Grey LLP.
Condo Smarts: Bylaw Updates and Election Laws
There is no value in homegrown bylaws that end up being
unenforceable or result in your community being dragged into
the courts or tribunal complaints.
After 10 years, our strata corporation of 118 units is
undertaking a bylaw review. We realized many of our bylaws are
out of date resulting from changes in legislation, decisions in
the courts and in the tribunal. Is there a "one place fits all"
or publications that catch all these changes to cross reference
for updates? Read the full article published in The
Province.
BC Tribunal Upholds $200 Strata
Fine for Improper Recycling
BC's Civil Resolution Tribunal has dismissed a complaint from a
strata tenant who claimed he was inappropriately fined for
putting recyclables in the wrong collection box. The complaint
was brought forward by Leonardo de Azevedo Rossi, a strata lot
tenant in a Metro Vancouver strata corporation. Read the BIV
article.
The Cullen Report on Money Laundering in BC:
Implications for the Real Estate Sector
The Final Report of Public Inquiry into Money Laundering in
British Columbia was delivered and commissioned by Mr. Austin
Cullen (the "Commissioner", and the "Report", respectively).
The Report outlines concerns with money laundering in British
Columbia. Specifically, the Commissioner describes the current
regulatory framework across multiple sectors, outlined
weaknesses that allow for money laundering, and provided
recommendations for fortifying loopholes. Read the full article by Sara Shuchat and Gillian Haggett with Whitelaw Twining.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
There
were no amendments this month. |
WILLS
& ESTATES |
Wills and Estates News:
Can the Personal Representative of a Deceased
Separated Spouse
Start a Claim Against the Surviving Former Spouse?
In a decision released on February 25, 2022, the British
Columbia Court of Appeal confirmed that the personal
representative of a deceased separated married spouse may bring
a family law claim against the surviving spouse if they had not
divorced. The case is Weaver Estate v. Weaver 2022 BCCA 79.
Lani Jo Weaver and Albert Russell Weaver married in 1993 and
separated in 2005. They did not divorce, sign any separation
agreement or bring any family law proceedings against each
other. Read the full article by Stan Rule with Sabey Rule LLP.
Executor Relies upon Presumption of Due
Execution to Prove Validity of Will
When there is a challenge to the validity of a will on the
basis that (1) the will-maker lacked testamentary capacity, or
(2) the will-maker did not have knowledge and approval of the
contents of the will, the person seeking to prove the validity
of the will (the "propounder") is assisted by the presumption
of due execution.
The presumption of due execution provides that if a will is
properly executed in compliance with the Wills, Estates and Succession Act
("WESA"), then it is presumed that the will-maker had
knowledge and approval and testamentary capacity, subject to
evidence of suspicious circumstances. It then falls on
the person challenging the validity of the will to rebut the
presumption. Read the full article by James Zaitsoff, posted on the BC
Estate Litigation Blog.
Supreme Court of BC Declares Deceased Woman's
Will
Invalid Due to Lack of Testamentary Capacity
The Supreme Court of British Columbia has invalidated a will of
a deceased woman due to the presence of suspicious
circumstances surrounding its execution.
In Jung Estate v Jung Estate, 2022 BCSC 1298, the testatrix is the late
mother of two adult sons – the plaintiff and the
defendant. When she executed her will, she owned a property in
Vancouver. In her will, the testatrix made a specific bequest
of the property to the defendant and only gave the plaintiff
the residue of her estate. The parties later agreed that the
residue of the estate would be fully spent, and there will be
no funds to be distributed to the plaintiff. Read the full article by Katrina Eñano with the Canadian
Lawyer.
BC Case Comment – Update: On Appeal, Surviving
Business Owner Still not
Entitled to ReceivePartnership Property by Right of
Survivorship
Estate litigation issues do not just arise as between family
members of the deceased (although that is most common). A
death may also result in disputes with respect to the
deceased's business dealings and partnership holdings. This is
why a fulsome estate plan that addresses all interests,
personal and business, is key.
In a previous post found here, I discussed what happens when your
business partner dies, in particular when the assets of the
business are held jointly. I considered this in the context of
the decision of the B.C. Supreme Court in Garland v.
Newhouse 2021 BCSC [1291]. Read the full article by James Zaitsoff, posted on the BC
Estate Litigation Blog.
|
Act or Regulation Affected |
Effective Date |
Amendment Information |
There
were no amendments this month. |
The content of this document is intended
for client use only. Redistribution to anyone other than
Quickscribe clients (without the prior written consent of
Quickscribe) is strictly prohibited.
QUICKSCRIBE SERVICES LTD.
DISCLAIMER
The Reporter includes articles that should be used for
information and educational purposes only and are not intended
to be a source of legal advice. Please consult with a lawyer
before choosing to act on any information included in the
Reporter. The content in each article is owned by its
respective author.
UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS EMAIL SERVICE
To unsubscribe from this service, click here. |