Federal Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act
Added to Quickscribe
While Quickscribe is primarily known as a BC legislation service provider, you may be surprised to know that we do include a growing list of federal laws as a convenience to our clients. We are pleased to report that we recently added the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act. This Act facilitates compromises and arrangements between companies and their creditors. It defines key terms, outlines procedures for companies seeking to restructure their debts, and specifies the powers and responsibilities of the court. The Act also addresses issues such as cross-border insolvencies, the treatment of Crown claims, and the rights and obligations of various stakeholders, including employers, directors, and secured creditors. Quickscribe also includes the Canada Business Corporations Act and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Federal laws are normally added by request, so please feel free to reach out if you have any other suggestions.

A Critical Alert for Businesses – Significant Amendments to
Consumer Protection and Arbitration Laws in BC
The legal landscape for consumer businesses operating in British Columbia is poised for significant changes.

On March 13, 2025, the BC legislature passed the third reading of Bill 4, the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Amendment Act, 2025, a proposed amendment to the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act, SBC 2004, c 2 (the "BPCPA").

Once passed into law, Bill 4 will introduce critical changes that directly affect consumer contracts, with notable implications for arbitration clauses and the retroactive application of the law. [Some sections of Bill 4 have already come into force, while most of these changes are expected to come into force by regulation at a future date. For your convenience, Quickscribe has published an early consolidation of the Act as it will read once all the remaining amendments come into force at that time.] Read the full article by Craig A.B. Ferris and Scott Lucyk with Lawson Lundell.

Alert: Changes to Canadian AML Regime Affecting
Cheque Cashing, Factoring and Financing and
Leasing Businesses in Effect April 1, 2025
Canada's Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Regulations are being amended to introduce anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing obligations for factoring, financing and leasing, and cheque cashing businesses. These amendments ("Regulatory Amendments") were initially scheduled to come into force on October 1, 2025 but have been accelerated by six months. They are now coming into force on April 1, 2025.

The Regulatory Amendments also introduce obligations with respect to import and export of goods and reporting of material discrepancies with beneficial ownership registries, as well as information sharing between reporting entities. Read the full article by Ramandeep K. Grewal, Meaghan Obee Tower and Irena Ninkovic with Stikeman Elliott LLP.

Canadian Securities Administrators Proceed with Delegation of
Registration and Oversight Functions to Canadian
Investment Regulatory Organization
On March 18, 2025, the Canadian Securities Administrators ("CSA") announced they are proceeding with delegating additional registration and oversight functions to the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization ("CIRO"). In an effort to keep market participants informed of developments, the CSA has launched an online resource where readers can find up-to-date information on the delegation process in their jurisdiction.

Background
In November 2024, the CSA announced that it was considering delegating certain registration functions to CIRO, in an effort to create efficiencies and reduce regulatory burden. As CIRO currently performs registration functions under delegated authority in some Canadian jurisdictions, the further delegation would create a consistent and harmonized approach across the country.

The proposed delegation is likely to relate solely to investment dealers and mutual fund dealers, while portfolio managers, investment fund managers, exempt market dealers, restricted dealers, restricted portfolio managers and scholarship dealers will remain under the oversight of their principal regulator.

Read the full article by Jarrod Isfeld and Brendan Smith with DLA Piper LLP.

Not All Financial Reporting Requirements
Are Equal: A Tale of Two Statutes
Spring is typically a busy season for many not-for-profit organizations ("NFPs") that have fiscal periods ending in December or March. This is the time when organizations close their financial books, finalize year-end financial statements, and prepare financial reports for members and other stakeholders.

NFPs must also consider the legal requirements when fulfilling their annual financial reporting obligations. These requirements may depend on different factors, such as an NFP's governing statute, the nature and amount of funding it receives, and its contractual commitments.

This article reviews the financial reporting obligations, from a legal perspective, for two popular forms of NFPs in Canada:

• BC societies ("BC NFPs") under the Societies Act (British Columbia) (the "BC Act"); and
• federal not-for-profit corporations ("Federal NFPs") under the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act (Canada) (the "Federal Act").

Read the full article by Daniel Szeto with Miller Thomson.

New Public Transparency Register for BC Companies
Expected by Early Summer 2025
As first announced in 2023, the B.C. government will introduce a public register for the disclosure of significant individuals by late spring or early summer 2025.

Since October 2020, private companies in British Columbia have been required to maintain transparency registers, which disclose "significant individuals" who, directly or indirectly, have substantial shareholdings in a B.C. company or who have the ability to exercise control or significant influence over a B.C. company.

This bulletin provides a brief summary of the new rules related to transparency registers in British Columbia. For more detailed discussion concerning these new rules, please see our bulletin: Deeper Down the Rabbit Hole – British Columbia Corporate Transparency Register Will Become Accessible to the Public. Read the full article by Dierk Ullrich and Carmen Loh with Fasken.

Why It's Time to Tackle the Income Tax Act
With Canadians in the throes of an election campaign and the income tax filing deadline approaching, it's no surprise that the party leaders are talking money.

But while Liberal leader Mark Carney and Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre tout their respective tax cut promises to voters on the campaign trail, Heather Evans, CEO of the Canadian Tax Foundation, says politicians should tackle taxes differently.

Instead of receiving targeted tax cuts, Canadians would be far better off if a government promised significant tax reforms.

"We have a situation right now where, frankly, the complexity in the Income Tax Act, especially given Canada's challenging economic performance, suggests that tax reform is overdue as a way of perhaps enhancing productivity," she tells Alison Crawford on the third episode of Modern Law: Verdicts and Voices. Read the full article by Madalyn Howitt with CBA National.

Tax Court Strikes Minister's Pleadings of Inconsistent
Assumptions and New Penalties
In Uppal Estate v The King, 2025 TCC 34, the Tax Court of Canada (the "Tax Court") concluded that the respondent (the "Crown") must accurately state assumptions of fact made by the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") in assessing the taxpayer. The Crown cannot add assumptions of fact at the appeals stage that are inconsistent with the Minister's primary assessment position. While the Crown can add additional facts for alternative positions, it must do so elsewhere in its reply pleading and not in the "Assumptions" section. The onus is on the Crown to prove those additional facts, while assumptions are presumed accurate (if no evidence is introduced to contradict them). In addition, the Tax Court concluded that the Crown cannot, as an alternative basis for assessment, ask the court to impose a penalty that was not assessed by the Minister.

This case is important because it makes it clear that the Crown cannot, under the guise of an alternative argument, try to craft assumptions of its own or impose penalties that were not previously imposed. Read the full article by Al-Nawaz Nanji, Dominic Bédard-Lapointe and Erich Schultze with McCarthy Tétrault.

Updates to BC Sales Taxes
The following updates to sales taxes were recently posted:

Provincial sales tax (includes municipal and regional district tax)

• March 4, 2025
  The provincial government announced its 2025 Budget on March 4, 2025. Programs administered by the Consumer Taxation Programs Branch are amended as a result. Learn more at B.C. Provincial budget tax changes.
• March 5, 2025
  The following have been updated to clarify the types of motor vehicles that qualify as zero-emission vehicles:
  • Bulletin PST 308, PST on Vehicles (PDF, 400KB)
  • Bulletin PST 116, Motor Vehicle Dealers and Leasing Companies (PDF, 430KB)
  • Bulletin PST 117, Motor Vehicle Dealer-Use and Manufacturer-Use Formulas (PDF, 300KB)
  • List of zero-emission vehicles available in Canada
• March 17, 2025
  Bulletin PST 142, Online Marketplace Facilitators and Sellers, and Online Marketplace Services (PDF, 360KB), has been revised to add information about the penalty for failing to file an online marketplace facilitator annual information return.
• March 19, 2025
  Bulletin PST 116, Motor Vehicle Dealers and Leasing Companies (PDF, 430KB), has been updated to clarify how we classify trucks and vans, including zero-emission trucks and vans, as passenger or non-passenger vehicles for the purpose of calculating PST.
• March 21, 2025
  Bulletin PST 005, Buying and Selling a Business, is now web content. Find the new web page at Buying and selling a business. Please update your bookmarks to the new location on our website. This page has also been updated to include a link to the online Clearance application.
• March 24, 2025
  Bulletin PST 002, When to Charge and Collect PST, has been incorporated into web content. You can now find this information on our Charging and collecting PST web page.
• March 31, 2025
  PST exemptions and documentation requirements has been updated to:
  • Correct that the Certificate of Exemption – Purchase of Vehicle or Aircraft for Use Outside B.C. (FIN 440) (PDF, 190KB) is for use by purchasers, not lessees
  • Remove data backup services from the list of exempt items under Telecommunication services
  • Clarify the requirements when additional documentation is required under Affixed machinery and improvements to real property
• April 1, 2025
  PST Bulletins 500, 501, 502, 503, 504 and 506, comprising the Real Property Contractors series, have been incorporated into web content. You can now find this information on our PST for Real Property Contractors website.

Motor fuel tax and carbon tax

• March 28, 2025
  Fuel sellers will be required to submit carbon tax inventory returns along with documentation that supports the inventory amounts reported. Fuel sellers will use their inventory returns to claim refunds on security-paid fuel they own, or are deemed to own, as of the end of the day March 31, 2025. For more information, see our updated Additional security payment or security refunds when tax rates change page.
• April 2, 2025
  Carbon tax eliminated as of April 1, 2025
  B.C. has passed legislation to eliminate the B.C. carbon tax effective April 1, 2025.

For more information, visit the BC government website.

BC Securities – Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were recently published on the BCSC website:

• 81-101 – Mutual Fund Prospectus Disclosure
• 41-101 – General Prospectus Requirements
• BC Notice 2025/02 – Proposed amendments to National Instrument 94-101 Mandatory Central Counterparty Clearing of Derivatives
• 25-313 – 2024 Annual Activities Report on the Oversight of Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Canadian Investor Protection Fund

For more information, visit the BC Securities website.

New Hydrogen Facility Regulation in Force
On April 1, the new Hydrogen Facility Regulation came into force. As we wrote in the previous Reporter, this new Regulation establishes two classes of hydrogen manufacturing facilities that are not co-located with a facility for manufacturing ammonia or methanol:

• Class 1 Hydrogen Facility, having an aggregate weight of hydrogen less than 4.5 tonnes, and
• Class 2 Hydrogen Facility, having an aggregate weight of hydrogen equal to or more than 4.5 tonnes, with a capacity to produce less than 100,000 tonnes of hydrogen per year.

The Regulation outlines the processes for application, permitting, operation, emergency management and decommissioning for both classes of hydrogen facilities.

The application process for smaller facilities with minimal potential impacts on public safety and the environment will be simplified and focused on well-established standards used widely in the hydrogen industry. Larger, more complex projects will see an approach similar to other major projects regulated by the BCER.

Read the information update provided by Geoff Turner, Executive Director, Energy Transition and Intergovernmental Relations with the BC Energy Regulator.

British Columbia Introduces Changes to
Mineral Claims Registration
The British Columbia Ministry of Mining and Critical Minerals ("Ministry") has confirmed that the new Mineral Claims Consultation Framework ("MCCF") took effect yesterday, on March 25, 2025. The MCCF had initially been released in draft form on January 7, 2025 for consultation with industry and Indigenous communities. The Ministry has published both an MCCF policy and MCCF consultation guidance and updated the Mineral Titles Branch website to reflect the changes.

The MCCF, which replaces the automated mineral claim registration system with a new application-based process, responds to the 2023 British Columbia Supreme Court ("BCSC") ruling in Gitxaala v British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner) ("Gitxaala"), and seeks to ensure that the Province of British Columbia (the "Province") fulfills its duty to consult in respect of the registration of mineral and placer claims.

In Gitxaala, the BCSC determined that the Province was required to revise its current mineral tenure regime to facilitate consultation with Indigenous groups prior to registration. The decision provided the government 18 months, until March 26, 2025, to consult and design such a regime. An overview of the Gitxaala decision can be read in our 2024 Mining in the Courts Year in Review publication. Read the full article by Daniel Bornstein, Daphne Rodzinyak, Rachael Carlson and Gwenyth Wren with McCarthy Tétrault LLP.

Carney Kills the Fuel Charge: Impacts
on the Oil and Gas Sector
Mark Carney wasted no time after being sworn in as Prime Minister of Canada on Friday, dismantling the federal consumption-based carbon tax, the fuel charge, by way of an order-in-council on the same day. The new Federal Government described the policy as part of changes "…refocusing pollution pricing on industrial carbon pricing by effectively eliminating the fuel charge and removing the requirement for a consumer carbon price." Notably, the Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) will remain, and it is only the regulatory Fuel Charge being removed. This raises questions about the future regulation of industrial facilities, how the price on carbon will be impacted over time, and if there can still be a reduction on emissions in Canada.

The changes were implemented by way of amendments to the Fuel Charge Regulations and were in effect as of Friday March 14, 2025. Read the full article by Owen Clarke and Laura Jochimski with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

New Direction Ensures Affordable,
Stable Electricity Rates
In response to the economic and trade uncertainty faced by people and businesses across British Columbia, the Province is taking action to provide stability in BC Hydro's electricity rates during these unpredictable times, while keeping rate increases below cumulative inflation.

"We must take urgent action to protect British Columbians from the uncertainty posed by rising costs while building a strong, robust and resilient electricity system for the benefit of B.C.'s long-term energy independence," said Adrian Dix, Minister of Energy and Climate Solutions. "That is why we are submitting a rate stability direction to the B.C. Utilities Commission to set BC Hydro's rate increases for the next two years. This move guarantees certainty and reaffirms our commitment to keeping electricity rates well below the North American average and cumulative inflation, while growing our clean-energy advantage." Read the BC government news release.

Updates to Natural Resource Taxes
The following update to natural resource taxes was recently posted:

Mining taxes

• March 4, 2025
  The provincial government announced its 2025 Budget on March 4, 2025. As a result, amendments to the mineral tax were made. Learn more at B.C. Provincial budget tax changes.

For more information, visit the BC government website.

BC Energy Regulator Announcements
The following BC Energy Regulator announcements were posted recently:

• IU 2025-03 – Hydrogen Facility Regulation Introduced
• TU 2025-03 – New Notification Process to Streamline Minor Well Changes
• TU 2025-04 – Changes to Post-Incident Management in CM-IS
• TU 2025-05 – Updates to Streamline Facility Changes
• TU 2025-06 – Reporting of Produced Well Fluids

Visit the BC-ER website for more information.

BC Supreme Court Annuls Marriage Based
on Woman's Lack of Consent
The British Columbia Supreme Court has granted a woman's application to annul a marriage upon finding that she repeatedly told the man that she did not want to get married and only proceeded with the ceremony because of duress.

In Jaura v Jaura, 2025 BCSC 503, the claimant was a permanent resident of Canada, while the respondent was a New Zealand resident with a visa to visit Canada. Both parties and their families were members of what the claimant called a "religion-based cult group" based in India. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer.

Navigating Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Family Law Disputes:
Key Insights from L.M.H. v. R.M.V.
In a recent Supreme Court of British Columbia ("BCSC") decision, titled L.M.H. v. R.M.V., 2024 BCSC 1199 ("LMH"), the court contemplated the legal notions of jurisdiction simpliciter and forum non conveniens in the family law context. The LMH decision has particular value for family law situations which cross national borders.

The claimant mother and the respondent father in this family law case were married in 2006 in Mexico. For the majority of their marriage, including the birth of their two children, now aged 12 and 16, the parties lived in Mexico. The claimant and children moved to British Columbia in 2019 with the respondent's consent, and have habitually resided in British Columbia since that time. The respondent has during all times remained in Mexico. In March of 2022, the parties separated. Read the full article by Laurence S. Klass and Richard Baker with Watson Goepel LLP.

Expansion of Family Court Early Resolution Services
Coincides with Positive Evaluation
On April 1, 2025 the Early Resolution approach to Provincial Court family separation issues expanded to Chilliwack, Abbotsford and New Westminster. The Early Resolution Process has been available in Victoria since 2019, Surrey since 2020, and Port Coquitlam since 2024. Today's expansion coincided with release of the final evaluation report on implementation of the Early Resolution Process in Surrey.

The Early Resolution Process was designed to help families with issues like parenting arrangements, guardianship, contact, and support. It provides them with early information, needs assessment including screening for family violence, referrals to address both legal and non-legal needs, a parenting education program, and when appropriate, at least one consensual dispute resolution session before they file a court application. Family Justice Counsellors in the Ministry of Attorney General's Family Justice Services Division deliver most of the services. Read the full article from the Provincial Court of British Columbia.

Family Law Courts Address Impact of Intimate
Partner Violence in Divorce Cases
Throughout Canada, judges are being asked to address the impact of intimate partner violence in a separation and divorce. One such pivotal case is the Supreme Court of Canada's ongoing review of Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia. In this landmark appeal, the court was asked to determine whether a new tort of family violence should be recognized. If established, this tort would allow a former spouse to seek monetary damages for the enduring physical, financial, and psychological consequences of abuse within the family unit.

While the Supreme Court's decision in Ahluwalia is still pending, lower courts continue to confront divorce cases involving intimate partner violence. Emerging from those decisions is a clear judicial intention to ensure the impact of family violence is fully addressed in a separation. As in, courts are crafting important and meaningful remedies. Read the Financial Post article (paywall).

Province to Strengthen Invasive Species Legislation
The Province is proposing key amendments to the Wildlife Act in this Spring's legislative session to address the spread of aquatic invasive species. Once enacted, the proposed amendments will enable the Province to create regulations under the Wildlife Act to:

• Prohibit the transport of watercraft over land with the drain plug in place.
• Require inspection of all watercrafts entering BC from another jurisdiction prior to being launched in provincial waters.
• Require vehicles transporting watercraft to stop at designated inspection stations.

Read the full article from UBCM.

When, Where, and Why Does FPBC Take
Action on Unlawful Practice?
A recent story in the media has drawn attention to Forest Professionals BC's enforcement actions against an ecologist in Whistler. The story was prompted when another party shared a copy of a cease and desist letter FPBC sent following repeated complaints the ecologist is infringing on a reserved practice that is protected by the Forest Professionals Regulation. The complaints also expressed a concern for the safety of the public, given that the ecologist is publicly advocating for alternative fuel management that is inconsistent with established and proven practices.

FPBC's review of the circumstances substantiated these concerns and identified that the ecologist is not simply expressing a personal opinion but is actively providing professional advice to community organizations in a manner that contravenes provincial law. Given the potential risk to public safety, the concern for the use of appropriate science in the protection of interface communities, and the protection of our reserved practice, this case created an elevated cause for concern.

But before we review the specifics of the matter, it's important to understand the legal context that guides our decisions as a regulator. Our profession has always had protections in place regarding the practice of professional forestry; however, those protections were made more specific at the passing of the Professional Governance Act (PGA). Read the full article by Casey Macaulay and Garnet Mierau in the BC Forest Professional Spring 2025 issue.

Federal Government Publishes State of PFAS
Report and Risk Management Approach
The Government of Canada published the final "State of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) report" (State of PFAS Report), the "Risk management approach for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), excluding fluoropolymers" (Risk Management Approach) and a proposed Order adding a toxic substance (the class of PFAS excluding fluoropolymers) to Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) (Proposed Order) in the Canada Gazette on March 8, 2025. These documents are open for public consultation until May 7, 2025.

The State of PFAS Report concludes that the class of PFAS, excluding fluoropolymers, are entering or may enter the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that have or may have immediate or long-term harmful effects on the environment or its biological diversity, and that constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health. The publication of the State of PFAS Report and Risk Management Approach follows drafts of these reports originally published in May 2023 and updated in July 2024. Read the full article by Sarah Gilbert, Julia Schatz and Samantha Chenatte with Bennett Jones LLP.

Pest Management Regulatory Agency Opens Pre-Consultation Period
on Proposed Changes to the Pest Control Products Regulations
On March 7, 2025, Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) published two consultation documents as part of its ongoing work to clarify which categories of pest control products are subject to the Pest Control Products Act (PCPA) and the Pest Control Products Regulations (PCPR) passed under it, which products are exempt and which may be authorized (without registration being required). The PMRA is seeking further stakeholder input on the amendments being proposed. The comment period is open until May 6, 2025. Read the full article by Julia Schatz and Samantha Chenatte with Bennett Jones LLP.

The BC Cumulative Effects Framework:
A Guide for Forest Professionals
Every tree harvested, road built, forest burned, or stream crossed leaves an impact on the land. These impacts may seem isolated at first, but over time they accumulate and can lead to cumulative effects that shape ecosystems, wildlife habitats, and BC's natural resources. But how do we measure these complex cumulative effects? And how can forest professionals use this information to provide advice and make informed decisions?

BC's Cumulative Effects Framework (CEF) was developed to address these needs. Since its establishment in 2016, it has become a leading framework that proactively assesses, reports, and supports the management of cumulative effects from human activities and natural processes using the best available public information. Forest professionals can utilize CEF information including reports, data, and tools to better understand cumulative effects and to incorporate this information into practice.

This article serves as a guide for forest professionals on the use and application of the CEF within your practice. It will explore the key components of the CEF, what type of information is available, and how forest professionals can apply this in their work. Read the full article by Melissa Lucchetta and Darcie Fodor in the Spring 2025 BC Forest Professional.

Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made recently:

Environmental Management Act

• Consolidated Envirowaste Industries Inc. (The Answer Garden) v. Director, Environmental Management Act [Final Decision – Allowed In Part]
• Kask Venture Corp. v. Director, Environmental Management Act [Settlement Order – Appeal Abandoned Without Costs]

Water Sustainability Act

• Glenda Centrone v. Assistant Water Manager [Dismissal Order – Appeal Dismissed]
• Paradise Hixon Motel Ltd. v. Assistant Water Manager [Summary Dismissal Decision – Appeal Dismissed]
• Nicholas Vanderveen, Nelliese Klop, Anna Klop & Luke Neels v. Assistant Water Manager [Dismissal Order – Appeal Dismissed]

Wildlife Act

• Xin Yue Xiao v. Regional Manager, Wildlife Act [Dismissal Order – Appeal Dismissed]

Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.

Ottawa, BC Sign Pharmacare Agreement for
Contraceptives, Diabetes, HRT
The federal and British Columbia governments have signed a pharmacare agreement that will address the healthcare needs of nearly two million residents in the province.

The agreement will see an investment of more than $670 million over four years to provide universal access to contraceptives, diabetes medications, devices and supplies for BC residents.

"This national pharmacare agreement with BC is a significant milestone in building a stronger public healthcare system for Canadians," said Canada's Minister of Health Mark Holland. Read the full article by Jim Wilson in the Canadian HRReporter.

New Guidance on Involuntary Care under the
Mental Health Act Published
On March 12, Dr. Daniel Vigo, the Chief Scientific Advisor on Psychiatry, Toxic Drugs, and Concurrent Disorders, published the "General guidance for physicians on the use of the Mental Health Act when treating adults with substance use disorders" document. The guidance is intended to clarify for clinicians how the Mental Health Act relates to involuntary treatment, particularly to clarify when people with substance use disorders can be involuntarily detained under section 22 and receive treatment under section 31 of the Act. Read the guidance.

Beyond Statutory Immunity: British Columbia
Supreme Court Case Exposes New Civil
Liability Risks for Regulators
Unfair regulatory investigations and decisions now present more than just judicial review risks – the regulator may be exposing themselves, their staff and even legal counsel to civil liability. In Thmbran v. The British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives (Thmbran), the British Columbia Supreme Court permitted tort claims against both the College of Nurses and Midwives (College) and individual staff members to proceed, establishing that statutory immunity offers limited protection where there is bad faith handling of regulatory complaints.

Case background
The dispute arose from a complaint alleging that a registered nurse failed to respond appropriately to reports of resident-on-resident sexual misconduct at a long-term care facility. The College's investigation exhibited many troubling irregularities that ultimately drew judicial criticism. The appointed inspector allegedly misrepresented key facts in a way that implicated the nurse, including changing material details such as the date and location of the alleged incident, with no clear explanation, ultimately leading the College to find her conduct unsatisfactory.

Read the full article by Ivy Yang and Morgan Camley with Dentons.

Health Canada Consults on Pathway for
Health Products Containing CBD
Health Canada recently announced that it is exploring a regulatory pathway that would allow products containing cannabidiol ("CBD") to be purchased without a prescription. Under the current regulatory scheme, all health products containing CBD or other cannabinoids are regulated as prescription drugs, and this consultation aims to explore potential other pathways including regulation as natural health products.

In considering a new pathway, Health Canada's goal is to protect the health and safety of Canadians while enabling access to safe, effective and high-quality products for human and animal use to treat specific or minor ailments. Interested parties have until June 5, 2025 to submit feedback to Health Canada. Read the full article by Sara Zborovski, Ian Trimble and Sandra Elashmouny with Stikemant Elliott LLP.

Ottawa Expanding Canadian
Dental Care Plan Coverage
More working age Canadians will soon be able to enjoy the benefits of the Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP).

Starting May 2025, all remaining eligible Canadians aged 18 to 64 years old will be able to apply for the CDCP, according to the government. This is the final group of Canadians who will become eligible for the program. Read the full article by Jim Wilson with Canadian HRReporter.

British Columbia is Taking Action to
Attract Doctors, Nurses from U.S.
The Province is taking new steps to attract more doctors and nurses from the U.S. by fast-tracking credential recognition and launching a co-ordinated, targeted recruitment campaign.

In 2024, B.C. connected more people to a primary care provider than ever before.

"With the uncertainty and chaos happening south of our border, we have an unprecedented opportunity to attract skilled health-care workers interested in moving to Canada," said Josie Osborne, Minister of Health. "Our message to doctors and nurses working in the U.S. is that now is the time to come to British Columbia. We will welcome you to our beautiful province where together we can strengthen public health care, deliver services for people and build healthy communities." Read the government news release.

The Rise of Section 107 [Canada Labour Code]
Last year saw unprecedented use of Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to end labour disputes, raising questions about just how much unfettered power the section gives the federal minister of labour.

Labour unions are challenging the use of the provision at the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) and in Federal Court, particularly when the Board says it has no discretion but to implement the minister's orders.

Section 107 states that the labour minister, where expedient or necessary to secure industrial peace, may refer questions to the CIRB or direct the Board to do things the Minister deems necessary. It has been part of the Code since 1984 and largely went unused until 2011 when then-labour minister Lisa Raitt used it when Air Canada flight attendants had twice voted down collective agreements. Read the full article by Dale Smith in the CBA National.

BC Court of Appeal Allows Ex-Employees to Amend
Pleadings Alleging Pre-Contractual Dishonesty
The British Columbia Court of Appeal has allowed an appeal [2025 BCCA 57] to the extent of setting aside an order certifying common issues relating to the breach of the duty of honest performance. However, it permitted an amendment of the relevant pleadings.

Ocean Pacific Hotels Ltd. – the appellant in this case – operated the Pan Pacific Hotel in Vancouver. It could not offer regular shifts to multiple employees after the COVID-19 pandemic seriously impacted its hotel operations. The respondents in this case were former employees who, in summer 2020, signed offers of casual employment replacing their existing regular employment contracts. Read the full article by Bernise Carolino in the Canadian Lawyer magazine.

Turbulence Ahead: BC's Replacement Worker Rules May Shake
Up Strike Contingency Planning and Labour Disputes
Unionized employers in British Columbia that operate across multiple provinces should take note of a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the "Court") in Gate Gourmet Canada Inc. v Unite Here, Local 40, 2024 BCSC 1528. The Court, in upholding the decision of the British Columbia Labour Relations Board (the "Board"), affirmed that replacement worker restrictions in the provincial Labour Relations Code (the "Code") apply even when work is transferred outside the province. This ruling has significant implications for employers who operate across multiple jurisdictions and underscores the extra-territorial reach of the Code's replacement worker restrictions.

Gate Gourmet Canada Inc. ("Gate") is a single corporate entity that operates an airline catering business in British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario. Gate is provincially regulated in these provinces for the purposes of labour relations. Notably, of the three provinces Gate operates in, British Columbia is the only one that restricts the use of replacement workers (under section 68 of the Code). Section 68 does not impose a blanket ban on the use of replacement workers. Instead, it restricts their use in specific circumstances. For example, under Section 68(1)(b), an employer is prohibited from using the services of a "person (…) who ordinarily works at another of the employer's places of operations." A violation of these restrictions constitutes an unfair labour practice under the Code. Read the full article by Kris R. Noonan, Justina Sebastiampillai and Aiden Raff with Stikeman Elliott LLP.

Federal Minimum Wage to Increase on April 1, 2025
The Government of Canada has recently announced that the minimum wage for federally regulated employees will increase to $17.75 per hour – a 2.4 percent increase from the current rate. Employers must adjust their payroll information accordingly to ensure that federally regulated employees are paid at least the new minimum hourly wage as of April 1, 2025.

According to the federal government, the minimum wage increase will better ensure that "salaries for workers in federally regulated private sectors are keeping pace with year-over-year cost of living increases and help Canadians working in part-time, temporary and low or minimum wage jobs earn more." Read the full article by Brooke Stewart and Brianne Upshaw with DLA Piper.

Administrative Updates to OHS Regulations
under the Canada Labour Code
The federal government has amended six occupational health and safety ("OHS") regulations under Part II of the Canada Labour Code, (R.S.C., 1985, c. L-2) (the "Code"). These administrative changes aim to streamline the language of OHS regulations to better align with amendments that were made to the Code in recent years. The following regulations have been amended by Regulation SOR/2025-79:

• Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, SOR/86-304;
• Aviation Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, SOR/2011-87;
• On Board Trains Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, SOR/87-184;
• Maritime Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, SOR/2010-120 ("Maritime Regulations");
• Oil and Gas Occupational Safety and Health Regulations, SOR/87-612;
• Policy Committees, Work Place Committees and Health and Safety Representatives Regulations, SOR/2015-164 ("PWHS Regulations").

These amendments came into force on March 26, 2025, and apply to federally regulated employers. Read the full article by Ben Ratelband, Justine Lindner, Alexander Steele and Sheren Kamaei with McCarthy Tétrault LLP.

Approving Officers' Corner: Providing Relief from the
Requirement for Highway Access
When it comes to the subdivision of land, approving officers likely know the default rule for highway access under section 75 of the Land Title Act (the "LTA"): "to the extent of the owner's control, there must be a sufficient highway to provide necessary and reasonable access" to all new parcels. However, an approving officer may grant relief from this requirement in certain circumstances, which this article will review.

The LTA defines "subdivision" as "the division of land into 2 or more parcels, whether by plan, apt descriptive words or otherwise". Before a subdivision plan is filed, s. 83 of the LTA requires that it be examined and approved by the local government's approving officer. Section 86 of the LTA gives the approving officer the ability to refuse to approve a subdivision plan for various reasons, including, under s. 86(1)(c)(ii), if they consider that "the plan does not comply with the provisions of this Act relating to access and the sufficiency of highway allowances shown in the plan, and with all regulations of the Lieutenant Governor in Council relating to subdivision plans". Read the full article by Serge Grochenkov, published in the March 2025 issue of the Young Anderson Barristers & Solicitors newsletter.

Two Recent Vancouver Municipal Integrity Reports
Highlight Need for Provincial Legislation,
BC Ombudsperson Says
BC Ombudsperson Jay Chalke is urging the provincial government to take legislative action following two recent reports out of Vancouver that underscore the limitations of BC's optional approach to municipal integrity oversight. In a letter to Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs Ravi Kahlon, sent on March 26, 2025, Chalke calls on the province to introduce legislation that would ensure independent and enforceable ethics and integrity oversight of local officials.

"Two recent reports from Vancouver highlight the pressing need for this legislation," said Chalke. "The findings demonstrate the serious risks of relying solely on local oversight. Without a provincial framework, local ethics and integrity bodies are only established by local by-law and thus lack the protection needed to operate independently and effectively. As a result, public accountability suffers." Read the full news release on the Office of the Ombudsperson website.

Understanding No Duty of Care Clauses in Municipal
Professional Services Agreements
Recently, a number of municipalities in BC have incorporated "no duty of care" clauses ("NDCC") in their engineering services agreements ("ESAs"). For frame of reference, ESAs are typically executed between municipalities and consulting engineering companies for the provision of specialized engineering or project management services that the municipalities choose not to complete "in-house."

The municipality will usually have its own engineers that facilitate the work completed by the consultant, which may involve providing information or making certain representations before or after the execution of the ESA. The intended purpose of the NDCCs appears to be to shield the municipalities and the professionals they employ from liability in these circumstances. In this post, we review the clause, consider its effects, and recommend to consultants how to approach the work under an ESA that includes such a clause. Read the full article by Dorsa Izadi and Jordan Graham with Whitelaw Twining.

BCSC Quashes Censure Decision on
Procedural Fairness Grounds
In the recent decision Paull v. Quesnel (City), 2025 BCSC 347, the Supreme Court of British Columbia considered the lawfulness of three resolutions adopted by Council that censured and sanctioned the City's Mayor. These reprimands flowed from allegations relating to a book that disputed some of the findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission; particularly that the Mayor's wife distributed this book, the Mayor condoned this distribution, and the Mayor attempted to distribute the book to members at a Regional District board meeting. The BCSC ultimately quashed the resolutions on procedural fairness grounds, noting that the staff report underlying the resolutions was ambiguous and confusing and the decision to censure and sanction the Mayor was based on alleged misconduct different from that set out in the staff report. Read the full article by Jack Wells, Nick Falzon and Reece Harding with Young Anderson Barristers & Solicitors.

Victoria's Message to Local Authorities:
Don't Tell People to Shelter in Parks
The message is aimed mainly at public agencies like Island Health, rather than social-service providers, says the mayor
The City of Victoria is making it clear it doesn't want other local governments or authorities directing people to take refuge in its parks, or transporting anyone who is homeless to the city without first finding them shelter.

City council has endorsed bylaw amendments that are intended to better clarify the city's stance on sheltering in public parks, while signalling they're not a dumping ground to be used by public agencies when there is no alternative housing available. Read the Times Colonist article (paywall).

Take Notice: Builders Lien Act Notices of Interest
When reviewing title to property that a local government owns or wishes to acquire, it is understandable that seeing the words "Builders Lien" may cause concern. However, digging further into the nature of that interest in the land may calm those feelings. Such a notation on title may not, in fact, relate to a claim of builders lien from an unpaid claimant.

While a claim of builders lien would be shown on title under the heading "Charges, Liens and Interests", there is an entirely different type of filing called a "Notice of Interest, Builders Lien Act (S.3(2))" that, when registered, is shown on title under the heading "Legal Notations". Legal notations are registered for informational purposes. However, their impact on a property can be substantial. In the case of Builders Lien Act Notices of Interest, these notices serve as a benefit to the property owner. Read the full article by Jacob Lewin, published in the March 2025 Young Anderson Barristers & Solicitors newsletter.

UBCM Executive Calling for Local Infrastructure
Stimulus Funding in Face of Trade War
UBCM Executive is in Victoria this week to meet with the Premier, Cabinet Ministers, the Leader of the Opposition and other MLAs to discuss core priorities for the coming year. As the trade war with the United States continues, UBCM is making the case for local infrastructure stimulus spending to support the economy. UBCM board members are also highlighting the need for additional investments to expand affordable and supportive housing, and targeted spending to increase mental health and complex care facilities.

The trade war with the United States is a threat to BC's economy, but we aren't without options. Public investment in local infrastructure is a proven tool for economic growth: Every $1 spent on infrastructure generates $1.14 in gross domestic product, creates good jobs and stimulates new business spin-offs. Read the UBCM article.

The Governments of Canada and British Columbia
Finalize an Agreement for the Canada
Housing Infrastructure Fund
The governments of Canada and British Columbia have finalized an agreement under the Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund (CHIF).

The agreement provides $250 million in federal funding over five years for Phase 1 of the Iona Island Wastewater Treatment Plant project to enable more homes and improve densification. The funding is an equal cost match of the Province's contribution toward the project in 2023 and helps secure the funding required for phase one of the project. The funding will support the Metro Vancouver Regional District to improve the facility for the health and safety of the residents in Metro Vancouver and the surrounding coastal waters. Read the government news release.

PLN Upcoming Webinar April 30, 2025
PIBC's Peer Learning Network (PLN) will be hosting a new webinar entitled The Cold Hard Truths About Housing Development and the Art of the Possible on April 30, 2025. Visit the PLN website for more information, including how to register for this event.

The Extraterritorial Reach of BC's Privacy Laws:
Court Upholds Privacy Commissioner's Order
Against Foreign AI Company [PIPA]
Driven by the development of AI and other technologies, companies are gaining increasing ability to access and extract volumes of information from various online sources across jurisdictions. The ease and far-reaching capabilities of these data extraction or "scraping" tools give companies a competitive advantage that is enticing. With this ability, however, comes responsibility, particularly where personal information is concerned and regardless of whether the company is a foreign entity.

The highly anticipated B.C. decision of Clearview AI Inc. v. Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 2311 is a seminal ruling on the jurisdictional application of BC's Personal Information Protection Act, S.B.C. 2003, c. 63 (BC PIPA) that may have ripple effects across other jurisdictions.

Background
This case stems from a U.S.-based company's "scraping" of images of the faces of individuals using facial recognition technology, including those in British Columbia, without their consent from various public websites and online platforms, including Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter. The company, Clearview AI Inc. (Clearview), collected these images for the purposes of providing facial recognition services to third parties such as law enforcement agencies and private sector entities, allowing them to match faces to the images contained within Clearview's searchable biometric database. To date, Clearview's database contains over 50 billion facial images collected across the Internet.

Read the full article by Claire Feltrin and Ingrid Vanderslice with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP.

Update on Bill 7: BC Government Scales Back Emergency
Powers – Part 4 Withdrawn for Revisions
On March 25, 2025, we wrote about the British Columbia government's proposed Bill 7, the Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) Act (the Act), and our concerns that Part 4 of the Act proposed granting sweeping powers to cabinet without proper oversight from the legislature. A link to the full article is here.

On March 28, 2025, Premier Eby announced that Part 4 of the Act is being removed from Bill 7. At a press conference, Premier Eby acknowledged that the current draft of Part 4 of the Act fails to strike a balance between ensuring the government can respond quickly to the actions foreign governments and maintaining legislative oversight and democratic safeguards. Read the full article by Kay Scorer and Mélanie Power with Dentons. 

A New Chapter for Canadian Trademark Legislation:
What Brand Owners Need to Know
Amendments to the Trademarks Act (the "Act") and the Trademarks Regulations (the "Regulations") are coming into force on April 1, 2025.

Among other things, these legislative changes are intended to address key stakeholder concerns, provide brand owners with a more efficient and cost-effective resolution of proceedings before the Trademarks Opposition Board (the "TMOB") and an easier method to overcome official mark objections when applying for trademark registrations. Read the full article by Clare Robinson and R. Nelson Godfrey with Gowling WLG.

Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025 Introduced
Bill 5, Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2025, proposes amendments to the following Acts:

Balanced Budget and Ministerial Accountability Act

• includes the 2027-28 fiscal year in the period of fiscal years for which budget deficits are allowed to be forecast in the main estimates

Assessment Authority Act

• transfers to the Treasury Board authority to approve British Columbia Assessment Authority bylaws that set taxes and rates for specified land and improvements

Income Tax Act

• adopts provisions of the federal Income Tax Act to provide for the continued inclusion of a child, for the purposes of calculating the BC family benefit, for 6 months after the death of the child
• increases the small business venture capital tax credit from $120,000 to $300,000 for the "annual credit limit that an individual can claim for investments made on or after March 4, 2025"
• increases the interactive digital media tax credit from 17.5% to 25% and makes the credit permanent
• increases credits for Canadian-content productions from 35% to 40%, retroactive to January 1, 2025, to support Canadian content
• increases the production services tax credit for international projects made in BC from 28% to 36%
• extends the availability of training tax credits for individuals to December 31, 2028
• extends by one year the specified periods in relation to the clean buildings tax credit

Provincial Sales Tax Act

• reduces the tax owed by a person who brings or sends a vehicle, or who has a vehicle delivered, into BC and who has previously paid certain types of tax on that vehicle

School Act

• exempts from taxation specified land and improvements, if they are land that has no present use or if they are used by First Nations exclusively for cultural or community purposes

Speculation and Vacancy Tax Act

• allows opinions and documents provided by nurse practitioners to be considered for the purposes of exemptions
• increases tax rates applicable for the 2026 calendar year and subsequent calendar years
• increases the tax credit in relation to tax payable by residents of British Columbia for the 2026 calendar year or a subsequent calendar year

Taxation (Rural Area) Act

• exempts from taxation the land and improvements, in an area specified in a foreshore agreement, that are held or owned by a treaty first nation that has entered into the foreshore agreement or by a public institution established under a law of the treaty first nation
• exempts from taxation land and improvements, if they are land that has no present use or if they are used by First Nations exclusively for cultural or community purposes

Federal Court Dismisses Prorogation Challenge but
Opens the Door to Future Attempts
The Federal Court has released its decision on the expedited challenge of the prime minister's advice to the governor general to prorogue Parliament, but in doing so, left the door open to future challenges of prorogation advice.

"The applicants failed to demonstrate that the prime minister exceeded any limits established by the written Constitution, including Sections 3 and 5 of the Charter, or by the unwritten principles they identified," Chief Justice Paul Crampton wrote in his decision. "The applicants also failed to demonstrate that the prime minister exceeded any other legal limits."

What was controversial among many, however, was that Crampton decided the matter was justiciable despite the Crown arguing and presenting evidence that it wasn't. Read the full article by Dale Smith with CBA National.

BC Supreme Court Annual Report 2024
– from the BC Supreme Court
The Annual Report of the Supreme Court of British Columbia covering the activities of the Court for 2024 is now available.

Carbon Tax Cancelled
Bill 8, the Carbon Tax Amendment Act, 2025, received royal assent on March 31, and amended the Carbon Tax Act to cancel the carbon tax by reducing its rate to $0 on April 1, 2025.

The amendments are expected to reduce motor fuel costs by about 17 cents per litre and save residential natural gas users approximately $30 per month. In addition, the Income Tax Act will be amended to eliminate the climate action tax credit beginning July 2025, which helped offset impacts of the carbon tax on people.

Large industrial emitters will continue to pay based on BC's output-based carbon pricing system, which supports decarbonization efforts and incentives for lowering emissions to avoid paying the tax.

The government introduced the bill on March 31 and expedited the passage of the bill within the same day to align the provincial carbon tax rate with the new federal rate which takes effect on April 1.

BC Court of Appeal Raises Compensation for
Woman Injured in Rear-End Collision
The British Columbia Court of Appeal [2025 BCCA 55] increased a woman's damages for future loss of earning capacity after finding that the trial judge did not correctly consider expert economic evidence and underestimated her future earnings.

The woman was injured in a rear-end collision near Victoria, BC while slowing at an intersection. She was 27 years old and working in a fast-paced role in media and public relations. She had been steadily advancing in her career and planned to pursue further education at a local university. Read the full article by Angelica Dino in the Canadian Lawyer.

Non-compliant Cylinders in Welding Kits
The purpose of this safety advisory is to advise the public of the risks and dangers associated with an influx of non-compliant gas cylinders coming into Canada. These non-compliant cylinders have not been approved for use in Canada and can pose a significant danger as they have not been designed, constructed, inspected and tested in accordance with Canadian requirements. From: Transport Canada.

CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following documents were posted recently by CVSE:

• NSC Bulletin 02-2023 – Publication of Carriers Cancelled for Cause
• CT Notice 01-2025 – Discontinuation of Fax Machine at the Provincial Permit Centre
• NSC Bulletin 01-2024 – Safety Rating Certificate and Status for B.C. Carriers
• CVSE1000 – General Permit Conditions to 4.4 m OAW
  (Guide to Using the CVSE1000)
  • Category A: Term & Single Trip Permits to 3.2 m Wide*
  • Category B: Term & Single Trip Permits to 3.8 m Wide*
  • Category C: Single Trip Permits to 4.4 m Wide*
  *See form for height and length limits
• CVSE0037 – Authorized Inspector Change Request Form
• CVSE0036 – Inspection Facility Change Request Form

For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.

Passenger Transportation Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC Passenger Transportation Board:

News and Updates

• 2025 Vancouver Cruise Ship Schedule for Transportation Network Services and Taxi Companies
  Taxi and Transportation Network Service (TNS) operators are reminded to review the terms and conditions (T&C) of their licence as the 2025 cruise ship season begins in Vancouver. Read the full update.

Applications Received

• 22051-24 – Western Educational Adventures Incorporated
• 21890-24 – Dara's Dolphins Transportation Services Ltd.
• 21112-24 – Alex Pettinati-Cadotte (Big Bear Limousine)
• 21101-24 – Pacific Western Charters Ltd. (Ebus, Red Arrow)
• 21410-24 – Transfer of Licence PDVA (Limo)

Application Decisions

• 21587-24 – Connect Airport Transfers [Approved]
• 22763-25 TOP – Dara's Dolphins Transportation Services Ltd. [Approved]
• 20869-24 – Bhana Transport Ltd. [Approved in Part]
• 20859-24 – Energetic Taxi Cab [Approved in Part]
• 20647-24 – Comox Taxi Ltd. [Approved]
• 21737-24 – Now Shuttle Limited [Approved]
• 21315-24 – Ucluelet Taxi [Approved in Part]
• 20548-24 – Z's Limo Service (ZLS) Ltd. [Refused]
• 21265-24 – Avantu Charters and Transfers Services Limited [Refused]

Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.

Workplace Safety and Criminal Negligence
Most construction projects are inherently risky and failure to adhere to safety protocols can result in criminal liability. In 2004, the Criminal Code was amended to modernize the criminal law's approach to establishing criminal liability of corporations and employees for workplace deaths and injuries, This amendment came into place after 26 miners lost their lives in an explosion in Nova Scotia. Pursuant to these amendments, corporations can be convicted of criminal negligence when:

1. a representative or representatives of the organization acting within the scope of their authority were a party to the offence; and,
2. a senior officer responsible for the aspect of the organization's activities relevant to the offence, departed markedly from the standard of care that could reasonably be expected to prevent the representative from being a party to the offence.

Consequences of criminal negligence include fines for both the individual and the corporation, and up to life in prison. Since 2004, a construction company and its employees have only been charged with criminal negligence three times in BC. A criminal negligence trial was recently heard in BC Supreme Court. Read the full article by Satinder Sidhu and Simon Wu with Clark Wilson LLP.

2025 New or Revised ACGIH Threshold Limit Values and
BC Exposure Limits (January)
from WorkSafeBC:
The Occupational Health and Safety Regulation provides that, except as otherwise determined by WorkSafeBC, an employer must ensure no worker is exposed to a substance exceeding the Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) prescribed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).

Twice a year, the ACGIH publishes a list of substances for which they have set new or revised TLVs. When WorkSafeBC adopts the new or revised ACGIH TLVs as regulatory exposure limits for chemical substances, these exposure limits are referred to as B.C. Exposure Limits (ELs).

An EL is the maximum allowed airborne concentration for a chemical substance for which it is believed that nearly all workers may be exposed over a working lifetime and experience no adverse health effects. ELs may be set out as an 8-hour time-weighted average concentration, a 15-minute short-term exposure limit, or a ceiling limit. Read the full news release by WorkSafeBC.

Emergency Planning for Hazardous Substances
Amendments to Part 5 of the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation came into effect on February 3, 2025. These amendments provide clarity and specify what emergency plans must include. "Emergencies can happen suddenly and without warning," says Diana Janke, senior prevention advisor. "The more prepared you are for them, the better you'll be able to respond in a way that reduces the chance of injury."

What it means for employers
BC's employers are already required to develop response plans for emergencies involving hazardous substances. The amendments now require them to:

• Prepare a written emergency response plan that is appropriate to the hazards of the workplace and clarifies roles and responsibilities during an emergency.
• Conduct training and drills annually or when a plan is revised.
• Engage staff in the emergency response plan process.

Read the full article by Steven Gilstead, published in the Spring 2025 WorkSafeBC Magazine.

OHS Advisor: New Support for Employers and Workers
WorkSafeBC has created a new occupational health and safety (OHS) advisor role to expand services for employers and workers.

OHS advisors will assist employers and workers in understanding their requirements under the Workers Compensation Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation and guide them to available tools and resources designed to assist in the development and maintenance of effective health and safety policies and programs.

An OHS advisor can offer guidance and advice on identifying hazards, assessing risks, and implementing compliant health and safety controls in your workplace. They can also help you prepare for new regulatory requirements. OHS advisors are there to provide support and guidance, and unlike WorkSafeBC prevention officers, they do not conduct workplace inspections or issue orders. Read the full article in the March 2025 issue of Forest Safety News.

OHS Policies/Guidelines – Updates

OHS Policies – Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
March 14, 2025
OHS Policy R5.48-1 has been amended (effective March 14, 2025) to reflect the current exposure limits for substances listed on the new or revised Threshold Limit Values for January 2025 from the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

• R5.48-1 Controlling Exposure – Exposure Limits

Guidelines – Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
March 14, 2025

• Part 5 Chemical Agents and Biological Agents
  • Table of Exposure Limits for Chemical and Biological Substances
    The table has been updated to reflect changes to OHS Policy R5.48-1 (amended March 14, 2025). Deletions are shown as strikethrough; additions and revisions are highlighted in green.

OHS Regulation: Three-point seat belts on mobile equipment
The following amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation are in effect March 31, 2025 [B.C. Reg. 283/2024].

Part 16 Mobile Equipment

• 16.2 Application (amended)
• 16.21 Seat belts (amended)
• 16.21.1 When minimum 3-point seat belts required (enacted)

Visit the WorkSafeBC website to explore this and previous updates.

$6,000,000 of Additional Property Transfer Tax
Levied on Property Owned by Two
British Columbia Companies
On March 7, 2025, the British Columbia Court of Appeal released its decision to uphold the ruling of the lower court. In this unanimous decision, the Court of Appeal agreed with both the Minister of Finance and the Supreme Court of British Columbia on the interpretation of "control" in the BC Property Transfer Tax Act, finding that the owner of the property in question remains liable to pay $6,000,000 in additional property transfer taxes on an acquisition of a property with a purchase price of $30,000,000.

This case underscores the importance of carefully assessing potential tax implications when structuring corporate ownership of real estate investments in BC. Read the full article by Lisa Harder and Xue Zhang with Lawson Lundell LLP.

Unexplained Wealth Orders: Show Me the
(Source of) Money [Civil Forfeiture Act]
Recent unexplained wealth orders offer another good reason to keep proper documentation that explains the source of money and reasons for its transfer.

The introduction of unexplained wealth orders in British Columbia has given the government the power, where the province has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person or company, or their affiliate, is involved in unlawful activity, to require owners to prove that there is no illegality to their money or the assets acquired with such money. Unexplained wealth orders can be far reaching and can apply even to funds transferred to spouses and relatives.

On September 9, 2024, Mike Farnworth, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General (the "Minister") released a statement regarding filing of the fourth unexplained wealth order application. This article aims to provide an overview of past unexplained wealth order applications and law surrounding unexplained wealth orders in British Columbia.

What They Do
Once the court grants an unexplained wealth order, a respondent or a responsible officer must provide particulars about the nature of the interest that the respondent has in a property (both real and personal) located in British Columbia, particulars of the respondent's acquisition and maintenance of the property or the interest or the portion of the interest in the property, and if the respondent is a corporation, trustee or partnership, additional particulars about the entity as specified by the court.

Read the full article by Jack Yong, Kayla Siu and Xue Zhang with Lawson Lundell LLP.

Discharging a Section 219 Covenant Without the
Grantee's Permission: An Application of
Section 35 of the Property Law Act
Section 219 of the Land Title Act permits special covenants to be registered in the Land Title Office on title to land. These covenants (known as "Section 219 Covenants") can only be granted in favour of specific organizations and entities. Section 219 Covenants must be in respect of the use of land or a building on or to be erected on land and, unlike common law covenants can impose positive obligations as well as restrictions on the landowner. These covenants are often used in connection with developments and subdivisions – an approving officer or municipality's council may, as a condition of subdivision or rezoning, respectively, require the landowner to grant the municipality a Section 219 Covenant to secure, for example, the provision of access or the construction of works. Read the full article by Kai Hsieh with Civic Legal LLP.

Restrictive Covenants: A Barrier to Housing
Developments in British Columbia
A complicating factor in the recent push to increase available housing in British Columbia are historical restrictive covenants that are registered on title to the properties that are the subject of proposed developments. These restrictive covenants are sometimes overlooked in the course of owners and developers purchasing properties for development, which can result in disputes before breaking ground on a development.

The landscape that has brought restrictive covenants to the forefront are Bills 441 and 472, which were introduced by the provincial government in 2023 to facilitate the creation of more homes in British Columbia. The new regime mandates that local governments update their zoning regulations to allow for "small-scale multi-unit housing" by June 30, 2024. This is a type of housing that maintains the ground-oriented design of single-family homes, while accommodating more units. Examples of these are secondary suites, duplexes and laneway homes (rather than larger condo towers or apartment complexes). Read the full article by Emma Irving, Andrew Mollard and Jasmine Der with Dentons.

British Columbia Introduces New Provincial
Short-Term Rental Registry
A significant update is coming to the short-term rental landscape in British Columbia with the introduction of the provincial Short-Term Rental Registry, set to come into effect on May 1, 2025.

This registry will require all short-term rental hosts, platforms and strata hotel platforms operating in the province to register. Hosts will need to display a registration number on their listings and short-term rental platforms will be required to validate these numbers against the registry to ensure compliance with the provincial rules. This new registry marks a key part of the government's ongoing efforts to regulate short-term rentals and address the ongoing housing crisis.

Below is an overview of key aspects from the Short-Term Rental Accommodations Act and its regulatory framework, including implications for the new registration requirements. Read the full article by Andrew Mollard and Jasmine Der with Dentons.

Amending an Annual Budget
Dear Tony:

At our recent AGM, we approved an annual operating budget of $414k which resulted in my unit fees increasing by $28. We received an email a month later stating that the CRF allocation had not been included in the budget's total or the unit fees and that the new budget was actually $465k and my fees were going up by $52. There are many owners, myself included, that would not have approved such a significant fee increase had the budget been correct when voted upon. Our property manager believes this to be a simple correction on a spreadsheet while I believe that the original budget of $414k cannot be adjusted or increased without an SGM to approve the revised total. Thanks for the help. – Ryan M., Vernon BC

Dear Ryan:

We frequently encounter situations where a "correction" has been made to bylaws, rules, or budgets after a meeting was adjourned, due to a technical error or omission of notice. A strata corporation general meeting approved the resolutions or proposed budgets that were included in the notice as issued or amended at the time of the meeting. If there is an omission, the strata council calls for a special general meeting to approve any changes or amendments. Neither the strata council nor the property manage has authority to edit or correct the error.

Read the full article by Tony Gioventu on Condo Smarts, published by CHOA.

Adaptable-dwelling, Seismic Provisions Take Effect March 10
New BC Building Code (BCBC) 2024 provisions for adaptable dwellings and seismic design come into effect Monday, March 10, 2025, with adaptable-dwelling requirements being gradually implemented.

After consulting the home-building community and recognizing current economic uncertainty, such as the recent U.S. tariff threat, the adaptable-dwelling requirements will be introduced in a phased approach, starting at 20% of units in large residential buildings, as opposed to the previously proposed 100%. This will help reduce potential costs associated with these changes, allowing for a balanced approach to phasing in adaptability requirements, while meeting the need for suitable, affordable housing. It will also allow the Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs to continue collaborating with key partners to help enable more adaptable housing in the province. Read the government news release.

Condo Smarts: Are Canvassers Allowed Access to
Building During an Election?
Dear Tony:

A signage bylaw that prohibits election signs anywhere on the property is causing dispute in my building. The council message this week: "It doesn't say anything in the Strata Act." Please write about the Elections Act so this group of bullies stops harassing owners. – John W.

Dear John:

While the Strata Property Act may be specifically silent on election signs and canvassing, it does clearly define bylaws and rules must comply with all enactments of law and the BC Human Rights Code. The Canada Elections Act, Provincial Election Act and Local Government Elections Act apply to all strata corporations in BC. Owners are being told they cannot place election signs in their windows, no signs on the common property, no signs on balconies and no signs in car windows in parking lots. The bylaws of a strata corporation are limited by the provisions of the legislation.

Read the full article by Tony Gioventu in the Vancouver Sun.

Pelletier v. Pelletier
The case of Pelletier v. Pelletier, 2025 BCSC 43, is about allegations of financial abuse by a granddaughter of her grandfather's wealth at a time when he was vulnerable and had been diagnosed by both a physician and a geriatric psychiatrist with dementia. The physiatrist wrote a letter in November 2018 opining that he was "no longer capable of making his legal and financial decision." One of the interesting features of this case is that when this case went to trial about 5 and a half years after the diagnosis of dementia, and the grandfather gave evidence, the trial judge, Madam Justice Whately, found that he "displayed no outward signs of cognitive decline, nor any of the behaviours or symptoms associated with dementia or other mental disorders that featured so prominently in the evidence." What happened?

Dora and Claude had three children, two of whom had died. They were close to their granddaughter Brittany Adcock, who was married to Darryl Adcock. Read the full article by Stan Rule on the Rule of Law blog.

The Deceased Polluter: Administering Estates
with Environmental Concerns
When it comes to the remediation of contaminated land, the "polluter pays" principle is well established in Canadian legislation and case law. But who pays when the "polluter" has died?

In British Columbia, the Environmental Management Act and Contaminated Sites Regulation (collectively, the "EMA") govern the identification and remediation of contaminated sites. The EMA imposes certain obligations on the executor of an estate (among other specified parties) if real property in the estate has been used for a "specified industrial or commercial use", including manufacturing, equipment maintenance and repair, road salt storage, outdoor shooting ranges, snow removal dumping, automotive repair, or dry-cleaning.

The obligations of the executor set out in the EMA include:

• providing a site disclosure statement when a triggering event occurs (e.g., sale of the property);
• arranging for investigation of the property to determine if it is contaminated; and
• arranging for remediation of the property, if required.

Read the full article by Catherine Bunio and Sabrina Ouyang with Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP.

Protecting Disability Benefits: Estate Planning for
Persons with Disabilities in British Columbia
Persons with disabilities and their families in British Columbia face a critical question: how to structure the person's income and assets to maintain eligibility for government disability benefits?

The Ministry of Social Development and Poverty Reduction (the "Ministry") administers the rules for receiving provincial disability benefits. The rules are set out in the Employment and Income Assistance for Persons With Disabilities Act. At the time of publishing this (March 2025) the current monthly 'persons with disabilities' benefits ("PWD Benefits") for a single person are $1,483.50, plus limited health supplements. To maintain eligibility for the PWD Benefits, a recipient must meet both an income test and an asset test. Read the full article by Geoffrey White, Shiona Nickel and Braeden Rahn with Clark Wilson LLP.

How Do You Prove Inheritance Theft in British Columbia?
When a loved one passes away, it is an extremely devastating time for any family. After taking the necessary time to heal, and honor their life, friends and family must turn their attention to administering the deceased's estate. The last thing on your mind would be whether someone else, be it a family member or friend, would take advantage of you and your family in such a vulnerable time. The good news is that inheritance theft can be proven and stolen assets can often be recovered.

Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to have your inheritance stolen by someone else, especially in situations where the 'thief' was not left any assets under the will but believed that they should have been. Whether it's an executor mishandling estate funds, a relative unduly influencing the deceased to alter a will, or assets mysteriously disappearing, inheritance theft is a serious legal issue in British Columbia. The first step to take to prove inheritance theft is to gather all evidence that suggests any wrongdoing. After this, you should consult with an experienced estate lawyer to assess your case and if inheritance fraud is found, they will help you file a claim. Read the full article from the Onyx Law Group.