New Definitions Feature on Quickscribe
In legislation, the definition of a word or term is
often buried within the law itself and not necessarily listed in the
designated glossary or definitions section. To complicate matters
further, there may be different definitions of the same term within a
law, depending on the context and section it is applied.
To assist you, Quickscribe includes a dedicated "Definitions" page that is accessible via the top navigation bar that appears when you open any law on Quickscribe. This page not only displays all the various definitions throughout a law in one convenient location, but also now includes the corresponding sections from which the definitions are pulled.
Another advantage of this feature is that the Definitions page opens in a separate window, allowing you to maintain your place in the document.
We hope that this new Definitions feature will make your legal research easier.
Did You Miss the Last Training
Session?
We have you covered! A recording of the most recent webinar
training session, hosted by Quickscribe owner Mike Pasta, has been
published
to YouTube. The short, 23-minute (edited) video will help to
ensure you and your colleagues are making full value out of the
latest version of this made-in-BC service.
New Annotations have been added to Quickscribe:
If you wish to be alerted when new annotations are published by our contributors, select "My Alerts" via the top navigation, then select the "View Expert Annotators". Here you can view and "follow" any contributor from the list.
Tip: Log in to Quickscribe Online prior to clicking Reporter links. | │ | ![]() |
View the PDF version of the Reporter. |
Quickscribe Alerts
Are you looking for a more custom
notification that will advise you about important
developments that impact your specific area of interest?
Quickscribe offers numerous customizable
alerts – visit the My Alerts Page. Quickscribe alerts
are included with your subscription, so feel free to select
the alert that works best for you!
|
Want to Track Federal Laws?For notification of federal amendments, we recommend using our Section Tracking tool to keep informed on changes to federal laws. Look for the paw icon adjacent to the sections you wish to track.
Looking for Previous Reporters?We have archived the Quickscribe Reporter going back to 2004. Visit the historical Reporter archives page. |
New Rules for Housing Needs Reports and OCPs, and
Amenity Cost Charges (Now in Force)
On June 18, provisions of 2023 Bill 44, c. 45, the Housing Statutes (Residential Development) Amendment Act, 2023, were brought into force by B.C. Reg. 152/2024. The amendments to the Local Government Act and Vancouver Charter
require official community plans to consider the most recent housing
needs report and the anticipated housing needs over a period of at least
20 years. The Housing Needs Report Regulation, B.C. Reg. 90/2019, and Vancouver Housing Needs Report Regulation,
B.C. Reg. 91/2019, were also updated with the method for calculating
the housing needed. An interim housing needs report must be completed by
January 1, 2025, and official community plans and zoning bylaws must be
updated by December 31, 2025. Guidance and resources for housing needs
reports can by found on the BC government website. Other recent changes related to the new housing initiatives include the introduction of Prescribed Classes of Affordable Housing (Local Government Act) Regulation, B.C. Reg. 156/2024, and Prescribed Classes of Affordable Housing (Vancouver Charter) Regulation,
B.C. Reg. 157/2024, effective on June 19. These regulations list the
classes of affordable housing that are exempt from paying amenity cost
charges in relation to a new development. For more information on
development finance tools, visit the government webpage.
June 30 Changes to Bylaws for Transit-Oriented Areas and
SSMUH Requirements (Now in Force)
As of June 30, provisions of Bill 47,
the Housing Statutes (Transit-Oriented Areas) Amendment Act, 2023, are
in force, requiring local governments to pass a bylaw to designate
transit-oriented areas. These bylaws must include a map or plan or other
graphic material and consider the guidelines under section 585.5 of the Local Government Act, such as the Provincial Policy Manual: Transit-Oriented Areas.
June 30 is also the deadline for local governments to update their
zoning bylaws to accommodate small-scale, multi-unit housing
requirements as set out in section 481.3
of the LGA, unless an exemption or extension applies, and the deadline
to remove minimum residential-parking requirements under section 525.
Bill 16 – Part One: An Overview of Tenant Protections
Bill 16 – 2024: Housing Statutes Amendment Act, 2024, (“Bill 16”), received royal assent on April 25, 2024. Bill 16 follows a series of other bills introduced in the fall of 2023 (Bills 44, 46, and 47),
which contain provisions generally designed to increase housing supply
by removing zoning constraints, especially on land within existing
settled areas and close to transit, and provide new and revised tools
for local governments to finance growth. Bill 16 introduces further
changes to the Local Government Act, Vancouver Charter, and Community Charter,
introducing new authority for tenant protection, inclusionary zoning,
and transportation demand management bylaws, and modifying existing
authority for density bonus (“benefits”) zoning and the imposition of
works and services requirements in connection with the subdivision and
development of land. This article, is the first of a three-part series
(all conveniently contained in this YA Newsletter) exploring the
contents of Bill 16. Part one reviews the new tenant protection powers.
Part two looks at density bonusing and inclusionary zoning. Part three
addresses new and improved works and services authority, as well as
transportation demand management measures. Read the full article by
Christopher Gallardo Ganaban and Eman Jeddy, published in the 2024 Number 2 issue of the Young Anderson Newsletter.
Permit Pitfalls: Lessons for Local Governments from Vanderhaeghe
In the recent decision of Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Vanderhaeghe, 2024 BCCA 169
(“Vanderhaeghe”), a development permit issued based on a mistaken
interpretation of a non-conforming use provision of the Local Government
Act (the “LGA”) implicitly granted a homeowner a development variance
permit.
Background
Ms. Vanderhaeghe wanted to replace her old waterfront cottage (the “Old Cottage”) with a new three-storey building (the “New Dwelling”). The Old Cottage was a lawful non-conforming building located within the setback area from the lake under the Regional District’s zoning bylaw. The New Dwelling would be roughly the same size and maintain the same footprint as the Old Cottage. Relying upon s. 529 of the LGA, the District issued a demolition permit for the Old Cottage and a development permit and building permit for the New Dwelling.
Read the full article by Thomas Haughian with Stewart McDannold Stewart.
Saanich Votes to Allow Secondary Suites in Rural Areas
Saanich
council has voted to legalize secondary suites in homes in rural areas of the municipality, in what the mayor called a "somewhat begrudging"
decision after the province forced its hand. Saanich Mayor Dean Murdock said it wasn't his or all of council's first choice – the first major
dispute between the province and Saanich over BC's efforts to increase housing across the province. Murdock said he's worried the part of the
municipality outside the Urban Containment Boundary does not have the infrastructure, such as access to transit and city septic or water
lines, to service the additional residents. However, he said if council refused, it could have allowed the province to set its own rules,
unilaterally deciding the number of secondary suites and permitting additional garden suites on rural lots. Read the CBC article.
'What If We Say No?': Burnaby Defies BC's
Transit-oriented Housing Laws
New provincial legislation requires BC cities to
allow taller buildings near transit hubs by June 30. Burnaby won't
comply. In its latest protest against BC’s new housing legislation,
Burnaby has delayed the bylaw required by the province to allow taller
housing heights near SkyTrain stations. Instead of approving three of
four major approvals needed at a council meeting June 24, Mayor Mike
Hurley formally tabled the bylaw for a minimum of 90 days. There was no
discussion around the council table, and the motion was approved
unanimously. Read the full article by Lauren Vanderdeen with Burnabynow.
(Es)cheating Has Consequences: Escheat and
Its Implications for Local Governments
One somewhat arcane property law concept that can be
relevant to local governments from time to time is the law of escheat.
While the Latin roots of the word, and its roots in the allodial title
system in England after the Norman Conquest, are beyond the scope of
this newsletter article, for our purposes it is sufficient to note that
an escheat is the reversion of property to the government. An escheat
may occur, for example, when an individual dies without lawful heirs, or
when a company or society is dissolved. The result of an escheat may
therefore be that the government takes a sort of ownership of land or
other assets owned by the individual at the time of death or other legal
entity at the time the entity is dissolved. The British Columbia Escheat Act
deals with certain rights and powers of the government relating to
escheats. Some of these powers were considered in the Court of Appeal’s
recent decision in Mowatt v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2024 BCCA 157 (“Mowatt”). Read the full article by Jacob Lewin, published in the 2024 Number 2 issue of the Young Anderson Newsletter.
Mostertman v Abbotsford (City): Residents Seek Class Action over
City of Abbotsford’s Handling of Sumas Flood
In November 2021, the Sumas Prairie in Abbotsford
experienced severe flooding, which led to significant damage and
displacement. The plaintiffs have applied to certify this action as a
class proceeding, alleging negligence and nuisance against the City of
Abbotsford. The plaintiffs claim that the magnitude of the flooding
resulted from Abbotsford’s failure to close the flood gates at the
Barrowtown Pump Station in a timely manner. The Sumas Prairie, a
floodplain in Abbotsford, is continually drained by the Pump Station,
operated and maintained by Abbotsford. Regardless of precipitation,
without the Pump Station’s operation, the Prairie would be submerged
within two to three days. The Pump Station features four flood gates
designed to regulate water flow from the Fraser, Sumas, and Vedder
rivers. Under normal conditions, the Sumas River flows through the open
flood gates, merging with the Vedder River, and ultimately into the
Fraser River. However, during reverse flow conditions, when the Fraser
River’s water level is higher than the Sumas River, leaving the flood
gates open can result in back flooding. This can flood the Outer Sumas
Prairie and, if severe, the Inner Sumas Prairie. The operating
procedures mandate that the flood gates be closed when the Fraser
River’s water level reaches 3.0 meters. Read the full article by David McKnight and Megan White with Alexander Holburn.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Assessment Authority Act | June 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, section 18 only (in force by Royal Assent), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Bylaw Notice Enforcement Regulation (175/2004) | June 19/24 | by Reg 142/2024 |
Civil Forfeiture Act (replaces Civil Forfeiture Act, c. 29, SBC 2005) | STATUTE REVISION June 17/24 |
by Reg 151/2024 |
Civil Forfeiture Regulation (164/2006) | June 17/24 | by Reg 151/2024 |
Development Cost Charge and Amenity Cost Charge (Instalments) Regulation (166/84) |
June 19/24 | by Reg 158/2024 |
Fees and Student Tuition Protection Fund Regulation (140/2016) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
Home Owner Grant Regulation (100/2002) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
Housing Needs Report Regulation (90/2019) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
June 18/24 | by Reg 152/2024 | |
Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation (241/2016) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 | |
Local Elections Campaign Financing Regulation (281/2021) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
Local Government Act | June 18/24 | by 2023 Bill 44, c. 45, sections 3, 10, 11, 13 (part), 16, 18 and 26 only (in force by Reg 152/2024), Housing Statutes (Residential Development) Amendment Act, 2023, as amended by 2024 Bill 16, c. 11 (in force by Royal Assent), Housing Statutes Amendment Act, 2024 |
June 30/24 | by 2023 Bill 47, c. 48, sections 8 and 10 only (in force by Reg 267/2023), Housing Statutes (Transit-Oriented Areas) Amendment Act, 2023 | |
Local Government Transit-Oriented Areas Regulation (263/2023) | June 30/24 | by Reg 267/2023 |
Prescribed Classes of Affordable Housing (Local Government Act) Regulation (156/2024) |
NEW June 19/24 |
see Reg 156/2024 |
Prescribed Classes of Affordable Housing (Vancouver Charter) Regulation (157/2024) |
NEW June 19/24 |
see Reg 157/2024 |
Sechelt Indian Government District Enabling Act Continuation Regulation (302/2005) |
REPEALED June 10/24 |
by Reg 123/2024 |
shíshálh Nation Government District Advisory Council Regulation (156/2014) (formerly titled "Sechelt Indian Government District Advisory Council Regulation") | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
shíshálh Nation Government District Municipal Benefits Regulation (243/88) (formerly titled "Sechelt Indian Government District Municipal Benefits Regulation") | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
shíshálh Nation Government District Property Taxation Suspension Regulation (126/88) (formerly titled "Sechelt Indian Government District Property Taxation Suspension Regulation") | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
shíshálh Nation Government District-Sunshine Coast Regional District Participation Regulation (244/88) (formerly titled "Sechelt Indian Government District District-Sunshine Coast Regional District Participation Regulation") | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
Spheres of Concurrent Jurisdiction - Environment and Wildlife Regulation (144/2004) |
June 18/24 | by Reg 155/2024 |
Taxation Rate Cap for Class 2 Property Regulation (329/96) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
Vancouver Charter | June 18/24 | by 2023 Bill 44, c. 45, sections 33 (part), 38, 40 and 46 only (in force by Reg 152/2024), Housing Statutes (Residential Development) Amendment Act, 2023, as amended by 2024 Bill 16, c. 11 (in force by Royal Assent), Housing Statutes Amendment Act, 2024 |
June 30/24 | by 2023 Bill 47, c. 48, sections 19 and 21 only (in force by Reg 267/2023), Housing Statutes (Transit-Oriented Areas) Amendment Act, 2023 | |
Vancouver Housing Needs Report Regulation (91/2019) | June 18/24 | by Reg 152/2024 |
Vancouver Transit-Oriented Areas Regulation (265/2024) | June 30/24 | by Reg 267/2023 |
The CRA’s Proposed New Audit Powers: More Discretion,
More Time to Reassess, Less Judicial Oversight
Budget 2024 introduced several proposals designed to
give the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) additional powers to obtain
information and enhance compliance with information requirements. The
proposed measures would apply to information requests under the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act
and certain other tax statutes. The stated intent of the proposed
amendments is to “enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of tax audit
and facilitate the collection of tax revenues on a timelier basis.”
However, the proposed changes really have the effect of significantly
tilting the playing field in favor of the CRA when it comes to
collecting information from taxpayers, and threatens to limit reasonable
protections that taxpayers currently have to withhold the production of
privileged and confidential information. This article will discuss
three major changes: (i) a new penalty for compliance orders; (ii) a
notice of non-compliance; and (iii) the ability to question under oath
or affirmation. Read the full article by Almut MacDonald with McCarthy Tétrault LLP.
Procedural Barriers to Justice in Tax Disputes
The Tax Court of Canada (the “Tax Court”) in Anderson v. The King, 2024 TCC 72
(“Anderson”), an informal procedure case, recently found that it could
not extend the time for a taxpayer to file an objection, that it could
not hear an appeal following a late objection, and that it did not have
jurisdiction to hear an appeal of the Minister’s refusal to accept a T1
Adjustment request. The decision emphasizes the importance of taking the
correct procedural steps when advancing a tax dispute, and raises
questions respecting what the Tax Court and Parliament can do to reduce
procedural barriers to justice in tax disputes. Read the full article by Jesse Waslowski and Rojin Esmaeili with McCarthy Tétrault LLP.
Canada's Clean Economy Tax Credits
Receive Royal Assent
In order to encourage early adoption of clean
technologies across Canada, and in response to the significant
clean-technology incentives promulgated under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act,
the Federal Government of Canada introduced the following refundable,
clean economy investment tax credits ("ITCs") over the course of Budgets
2022 to 2024:
On Thursday, June 20, 2024, the enabling legislation for the first four of the above five ITCs (Bill C-59 and Bill C-69) received royal assent - an important legislative step toward the enactment of legislation which will have wide ranging impact across many key Canadian industry verticals. The following provides a high-level summary of these four ITCs. Our bulletins for Budget 2022, Budget 2023, Fall Economic Statement 2023 and Budget 2024 contain details regarding the five clean economy ITCs. Read the full article by Zin Jiang and Laura Gheorghiu with Gowling WLG.
Clearing the Air: Canada Adopts New Greenwashing
Laws under the Competition Act
New amendments to the Competition Act in Canada are now in force via Bill C-59
after receiving royal assent on June 20, 2024. Many of these amendments
target "greenwashing" – a common shorthand for misleading environmental
claims about products or business practices. In Canada, greenwashing
has been regulated primarily as a form of deceptive marketing,
recognized as anti-competitive conduct. As a result, regulatory
oversight over greenwashing has come under the purview of Competition
Bureau Canada (the "Competition Bureau"). The new amendments to the Competition Act introduce a more targeted prohibition against greenwashing, and expand the means of enforcement as follows:
First, Bill C-59 introduces explicit prohibitions against deceptive environmental claims, requiring that such claims be based on "adequate and proper tests" or "internationally recognized methodologies." While this clarifies that environmental claims must be supported by "adequate and proper" testing, there continues to be some ambiguity with respect to these standards, although the Competition Bureau is actively monitoring parallel guidance in the United States and the European Union, where new directives and updates are also underway to standardize environmental claims. Read the full article by Christopher Oates, Melissa Tehrani and Aweis Osman with Gowling WLG.
Seven Lessons Learned after Year One of
Supply Chain Reporting in Canada
For many businesses operating in Canada, May 31, 2024
marked the first annual deadline for filing annual reports under
Canada’s Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act, formerly known as Bill S-211 or the Modern Slavery Act
(the Act). As we have previously discussed, the Act casts a wide net
with respect to the businesses that are subject to its reporting
obligations, which requires disclosure of the steps taken during the
previous financial year to reduce the risk of forced labour or child
labour in the business’ supply chain. Given the short timeline between
implementation of the Act and the reporting deadline, reporting entities
and government institutions were required to move quickly to prepare
their reports, often in the face of unclear and/or changing guidance.
Now that the dust has settled, it is important to consider the takeaways
and next steps to affect a seamless reporting period next year. Read
the full article by Laura Levine, Benedict S. Wray and Nasra Moumin.
Now It's Here: What to Do About the
New Capital Gains Tax
Changes
to the capital gains tax in Canada have created ripples across the
corporate landscape. As a business owner or investor, it's crucial to
understand how this tax impacts you, your business and your investments.
It’s time we discuss, from a Canadian tax perspective, what steps you
can take to navigate these changes effectively.
Understanding the New Capital Gains Tax
Capital gains tax is levied on the profit realized from the sale of assets or investments. The new rules, purportedly introduced (at least in part) to increase government revenue, have significant implications for corporations, investors, and high-net-worth individuals. The tax rate changes and adjustments in exemptions can affect your financial planning and investment strategies.
Read the full bulletin by Lori Bokenfohr with Fasken.
Green Light for Exempt Market Dealers to
Participate in Public Offerings
On
June 20, 2024, the securities regulatory authorities in Alberta,
British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec, and Saskatchewan (the
“participating jurisdictions”) published local blanket orders
(collectively, the “Blanket Orders”) pursuant to which exempt market
dealers (“EMDs”) will be permitted to participate in offerings under a
prospectus as members of selling groups. The Blanket Orders, which are
substantively harmonized across the participating jurisdictions, became
effective June 20, 2024 and are to remain in effect until December 20,
2025. The time-limited Blanket Orders are intended to support
capital-raising by early-stage businesses by providing EMDs with an
ability to participate in public offerings. EMDs play an important role
in assisting issuers raise capital through private placement offerings
without the use of a prospectus. Until now, EMDs have not been able to
participate in prospectus offerings. The Blanket Orders will enable EMDs
to continue to support issuers in their capital raising efforts should
they pursue prospectus offerings and are expected to provide more
capital-raising opportunities for Canadian small businesses. Read the full article by Derek Sigel, Robbie Grossman, Sydney Kert, Jamie Mandell and Sophie Gadbois with DLA Piper.
Updates to BC Sales Taxes
The following updates to sales taxes were recently posted:
Provincial sales tax (PST)
Motor fuel tax and carbon tax
Tobacco tax
For more information, visit the BC government website.
BC Securities –
Policies & Instruments
The following policies and instruments were recently published on the BCSC website:
For more information, visit the BC Securities website.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Designated Accommodation Area Tax Regulation (93/2013) | June 1/24 | by Reg 13/2024 |
Designated Institutions Regulation (158/2003) | June 10/24 | by Reg 127/2024 |
Insurance Premium Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 94 and 96 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Interest on Overdue Accounts Payable Regulation (215/83) | June 21/24 | by Reg 159/2024 |
Provincial Sales Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 205, 210, 219 to 221, 223, 227, 229 to 233 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Provincial Sales Tax Exemption and Refund Regulation (97/2013) |
RETRO to Feb. 23/24 |
by Reg 134/2024 |
RETRO to Apr. 25/24 |
by Reg 149/2024 | |
June 17/24 | by Reg 134/2024 and Reg 137/2024 | |
June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 | |
July 1/24 | by Reg 146/2024 | |
Provincial Sales Tax Regulation (96/2013) | June 17/24 | by Reg 137/2024 |
July 1/24 | by Reg 148/2024 | |
Tax Appeals Regulation (135/2024) | NEW July 1/24 |
see Reg 135/2024 |
Tobacco Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 254 and 256 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Harmony at Last? Amendments to Canada's Impact
Assessment
Act Seek to Harmonize Federal and Provincial
Assessments
The Impact Assessment Act ("IAA") has
been amended with implications for the assessment and approval of major energy, infrastructure and mining projects going
forward. The federal government unveiled amendments to the IAA in the Budget Implementation Act, 2024, No. 1
("Bill C-69"), which received royal assent on June 20, 2024.
The amendments are intended to ensure the IAA is more efficient and constitutionally sound. In a landmark opinion [2023 SCC 23] issued on October 13, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada found core components of the IAA to be unconstitutional, including the "screening decision" (whether a federal impact assessment is required), and the "public interest decision" (where a decision is made to allow a project to proceed or not). Read the full article by Liane Langstaff, co-authored by 2024 articling students Stacy Porter and Maggie Sainty with Gowling WLG.
Changes to Combustible Dust: New Regulations
Coming for B.C. Industries
In British Columbia's forestry sector, there has been no year in recent history filled with more preventable tragedies than
2012. In January of 2012, the Babine Forest Products sawmill in Burns Lake suffered an explosion that resulted in the deaths of
two workers while injuring 20 others. A few months later in April 2012, about a 2.5-hour drive from Burns Lake in B.C.'s
Northern Interior, the Lakeland Mills sawmill in Prince George exploded, killing another two workers and injuring 22 more
people. The investigations into these explosions found one culprit responsible: combustible dust. Since that time,
regulations have been tightened to ensure better management of combustible dust throughout the province.
B.C.'s management of combustible dust was the topic of the closing keynote presentation for the 2024 Global Dust Safety Conference, which took place earlier this year. The presentation, "Upcoming release process for the proposed British Columbia regulations for combustible dust. Why they are needed and what it means for industries in B.C.," was presented by Rodney Scollard, senior policy and legal advisor, and Mike Tasker, CRSP occupational safety officer with WorkSafeBC. Read the article from Canadian Forest Industries.
Wildlife Habitat Areas
Notice is hereby given that the boundary
of Wildlife Habitat Area 1-060 in the South Island Natural Resource District was amended on June 6, 2024 by order made
under authority of Section 10(1) of the Government Actions Regulation (B.C. Reg.
582/2004). Details of the order may be obtained from the Ecosystems Section, West Coast Region, Ministry of Water, Land
and Resource Stewardship, 2080 Labieux Road, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6J9, or from the following website: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/cgi-bin/apps/faw/wharesult.cgi?search=show_approved
[je20]
New Interior Appraisal Manual Posted
The new Interior Appraisal Manual came into effect on July 1, 2024, with a cost base of 2022. Some of the changes include:
Quickscribe will publish the new version of the manual to our site within the next few days.
Expanding the Scope of Cost-Recovery Actions
under BC's Environmental Management Act
A recent decision of the BC Supreme Court has opened the door for more creative ways for parties to recover remediation costs
pursuant to the cost-recovery mechanism in BC's Environmental Management Act. The
decision of Cordy Environmental Inc. v. Obsidian Energy
Ltd., 2023 BCSC 1198, which is currently under
appeal, allows contractors to recover the cost of unpaid remediation work against former owners or operators of
contaminated sites.
This decision significantly expands the liability of former owners, operators and other responsible persons, who may soon find themselves footing the bill for unpaid invoices they had no part in authorizing. Read the full article by Caryna Miller and Joshua Hoenisch with Harper Grey LLP.
CFIA Expands Emerald Ash Borer Regulation in B.C.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has updated its regulated areas for emerald ash borer (EAB – Agrilus
planipennis) to include an area in British Columbia, in
an effort to slow the insect's spread.
The regulated area in British Columbia includes the City of Vancouver, the University of British Columbia (UBC) campus and the University Endowment Lands (UEL). This is the first expansion of the EAB regulated area in British Columbia. Read the article from Canadian Forest Industries (paywall).
How the Tŝideldel First Nation and the Tl'etinqox
Government are
Integrating Indigenous Practices into Forest Rehabilitation
In 2018, the Tŝideldel First Nation and the Tl'etinqox Government created Central Chilcotin Rehabilitation Ltd. (CCR)
– a joint venture company whose work and values incorporates traditional wisdom through Indigenous practices.
Although CCR's focus is to coordinate large-scale forestry programs and initiatives within the Nations' traditional
territories, all work showcases how traditional wisdom through Indigenous practices can intersect with modern forestry
practices. By prioritizing the restoration of connections to traditional lands, the incorporation of Indigenous ecological
knowledge, the creation of cultural spaces, the inclusion of Indigenous-led decision-making, and building meaningful
partnerships, CCR is not just revitalizing landscapes, but also honouring the rich heritage of Indigenous communities and
holding space for healing intergenerational trauma. Read the full
article by Percy Guichon, Clayton Charleyboy, and Daniel
Persson in the BC Forest Professional Summer 2024
issue.
What is a Limited Licence and Who is it Designed for?
My last article in the winter 2024 edition of BC Forest
Professional introduced FPBC's latest designation –
the Affiliated Forest Professional (AFP.) This designation enables people with a wider range of educational backgrounds to
register and practice professional forestry. The AFP is one of the tools FPBC created to align professionals to the scope of
practice they provide while respecting the law under the Professional Governance Act. An
AFP holder, as well as a Registered Forest Technologist (RFT), may also be eligible for a limited licence.
A limited licence is a licence granted by FPBC to an eligible registrant to practise in a specific area of a reserved practice. The licence may define a limited expansion of scope for an RFT, or it may define a single area of practice for an AFP holder (or other associate registrant) who is not authorized to engage in any other aspect of a reserved practice. Read the full article by Casey Macaulay in the BC Forest Professional Summer 2024 issue.
Tackling Environmental Racism in Canada
After years of lobbying by advocates and affected communities, and multiple iterations, Canadian legislation aimed at
addressing and preventing environmental racism has become law.
Bill C-226 – An Act respecting the development of a national strategy to assess, prevent and address environmental racism and to advance environmental justice – received royal assent on June 20 after a long journey through Parliament. It is Canada's first law focused on the longstanding practice of disproportionately situating polluting industries and environmental hazards near Indigenous, Black and other marginalized communities. Read the full article by Moira Donovan in the CBA National.
Fines for Illegal Hunting and Fishing
More Than Double in B.C.
Fines for illegal hunting and fishing in British Columbia are more than doubling as the province cracks down on offences
against wildlife.
The Ministry of Forests says the new scale of fines effective Tuesday under the Wildlife Act ranges from $345 to $1,495, up from the current range of $115 to $575.
The biggest fines apply to people who hunt or possess big game out of season. The ministry says in a news release the new penalties "better reflect the serious nature" of wildlife offences and acknowledge the importance of wildlife to B.C. Read the BIV article.
Environmental Appeal Board Decisions
The following Environmental Appeal Board decisions were made recently:
Integrated Pest Management Act
Visit the Environmental Appeal Board website for more information.
Forest Appeals Commission
Decisions
The following Forest Appeals Commission decisions were made recently:
Forest and Range Practices Act
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Carbon Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 28, 29, 31, 32, 36 and 39 to 41 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Carbon Tax Regulation (125/2008) | June 17/24 | by Reg 137/2024 |
Closed Areas Regulation (76/84) | June 25/24 | by Reg 161/2024 |
Hunting Regulation (190/84) | June 25/24 | by Reg 161/2024 |
Limited Entry Hunting Regulation (134/93) | June 25/24 | by Reg 161/2024 |
Logging Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 113 and 115 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Motor Vehicle Prohibition Regulation (18/2024) | June 25/24 | by Reg 161/2024 |
Park, Conservancy and Recreation Area Regulation (180/90) | June 26/24 | by Reg 154/2024 |
Professional Governance Act | July 1/24 | by 2023 Bill 39, c. 32, sections 71 to 77 only (in force by Reg 129/2024), International Credentials Recognition Act |
Protected Areas of British Columbia Act | June 17/24 | by 2024 Bill 9, c. 10, section 12 only (in force by Reg 131/2024), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act, 2024 |
Wildlife Act Commercial Activities Regulation (338/82) | June 17/24 | by Reg 145/2024 |
June 25/24 | by Reg 161/2024 | |
Wildlife Act General Regulation (340/82) | June 25/24 | by Reg 161/2024 |
BC Supreme Court Upholds Stay on Physician's
Access to Information Requests
The Supreme Court of British Columbia upheld the
Information and Privacy Commissioner's decision to stay all of a
physician's access to information requests related to his Medical
Services Plan billing issues, making the decision procedurally fair and
reasonable. In Cimolai v British Columbia (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2024 BCSC 948,
the physician faced a 2017 audit by the Medical Services Commission
(MSC), resulting in an order to repay a significant amount and a
three-year suspension from billing MSP. Seeking information related to
this audit, the physician filed numerous requests under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
(FIPPA), leading to 126 requests for review and 24 reconsideration
requests to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner
(OIPC) between 2017 and 2022. Read the full article by Angelica Dino with Canadian Lawyer.
Amendments to Cannabis Regulations
Proposed by Health Canada
New changes to Canada’s cannabis regulations have been proposed
by Health Canada and are subject to consultation and request for
comments until July 8, 2024. The amendments come amidst calls from
industry and stakeholders to reduce the regulatory administrative burden
associated with their participation in the cannabis market. The changes
proposed include new requirements for licensing, personnel and physical
security measures, production, packaging and labelling, record keeping
and reporting. In 2018, Canada’s Cannabis Act
(the “Act”) came into force to govern the production, advertising,
distribution, sale, and possession of cannabis in Canada. The Cannabis Regulations
(the “Regulations”) created under the Act provide for specific rules in
relation to these activities, including requirements regarding
licences, packaging and labelling, and physical and personnel security
requirements. There are also other related regulations and orders
governing the cannabis market, including the Industrial Hemp Regulations, the Natural Health Products Regulations, and the Cannabis Exemption (Food and Drugs Act) Regulations. Read the full article by Jaclyne Reive an Jacqueline Rintjema with Miller Thomson LLP.
Damages Reduced in Breast Cancer Misdiagnosis Case:
BC Court of Appeal
"The
BC Court of Appeal partially allowed an appeal by a pathologist,
reducing damages in a breast cancer misdiagnosis case that led to an
unnecessary mastectomy. In Wolber v. Ivanova, 2024 BCCA 203,
Elena Ivanova underwent a right mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy
based on a diagnosis of a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer.
This diagnosis was derived from a pathology report prepared by Dr.
Robert Wolber. However, post-surgery analysis of the excised tissue
showed no signs of cancer. Read the full article by Angelica Dino with Canadian Lawyer.
BC Merges Health-profession Colleges
British
Columbia's government has amalgamated 11 health-professional colleges into two, setting the foundation for what it says is stronger oversight.
Health Minister Adrian Dix says merging the colleges is part of the government's plan to ensure health professionals are regulated more
consistently and robustly. The new College of Health and Care Professionals of BC will oversee roles including dietitians,
occupational and physical therapists, optometrists and opticians, psychologists, and speech and hearing professionals. The College of
Complementary Health Professionals of BC will regulate chiropractors, massage therapists, naturopathic physicians, acupuncturists and
practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine. Read the CBC article.
Authorities Shutter Vancouver Pharmacy Citing
Multiple Violations of Federal Drug Laws
A Vancouver pharmacy has been shuttered after inspections found multiple violations of federal drug laws and
provincial legislation, as well as evidence of criminal activities and public safety risks related to its delivery service, according to the
College of Pharmacists of BC.
The licence of Health Hub Pharmacy on
Fraser Street and the college registration of pharmacist Sukhpreet Singh Sidhu are suspended, effective Friday [June 28], pending completion of
an investigation and any resulting disciplinary proceeding. The pharmacy began transferring its patients out last week. The college said Health
Hub had about 300 patients. Read the BIV article.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Assisted Living Regulation (189/2019) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
Chiropractors Regulation (414/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 31/2024 |
Community Living Authority Regulation (231/2005) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
Dietitians Regulation (279/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Health Care Consent Regulation (20/2000) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
Human Tissue Gift Act | June 17/24 | by 2023 Bill 24, c. 16, sections 9 and 10 only (in force by Reg 143/2024), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2), 2023 |
Massage Therapists Regulation (280/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 31/2024 |
Naturopathic Physicians Regulation (282/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 31/2024 |
Occupational Therapists Regulation (286/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Opticians Regulation (287/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Optometrists Regulation (33/2009) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Physical Therapists Regulation (288/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Psychologists Regulation (289/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Residential Care Regulation (96/2009) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
Speech and Hearing Health Professional Regulation (413/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 32/2024 |
Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners and Acupuncturists Regulation (290/2008) | June 28/24 | by Reg 31/2024 |
BC Court of Appeal Affirms Plaintiffs Can Bring Novel
Claims
for Duty of Good Faith Breaches in Employment Contexts
In the recent decision of British Columbia v Taylor, 2024 BCCA 44, the BC Court of Appeal
found that the duty of good faith is a developing area of law in the employment context and courts should permit plaintiffs
to bring novel claims in this area.
In this case the plaintiff, Ms. Taylor, claimed that she was wrongfully dismissed from her employment with the Province of British Columbia in 2017 and that the Province breached their duty of good faith in her employment and termination of her employment. Read the full article by Christopher J. Wiebe and Tristan Kimball with Lawson Lundell LLP.
Province's International Credentials
Recognition Act Takes Effect
B.C.'s International Credentials Recognition Act
(ICRA) took full effect on July 1, promising to make credential recognition for internationally trained professionals "more
transparent, efficient and fair."
According to government, the legislation was enacted as the BC area expects one million job openings in the next 10 years, and most positions will be filled by foreign professionals trained from their respective countries. Read the full article by Noel Sales Barcelona in the Canadian HRReporter.
Human Rights Complaint Proceeds to
Hearing, Despite Signed Release
The BC Human Rights Tribunal (the "Tribunal") recently issued a decision in Fyffe v. University of British Columbia,
2024 BCHRT 88. In that case, the University had applied to the Tribunal to dismiss the complaint without a hearing on the
ground that it would not further the purposes of the Human Rights Code (the "Code") to
allow the complaint to proceed, as the complainant had signed a release agreement releasing the University from all claims
related to the termination of her employment, including claims arising under the Code. The Tribunal denied the University's
application and held that the complaint would proceed to a hearing where the issue of whether the release agreement barred
the claim could be raised again by the University and decided after oral evidence. In applications to dismiss, the parties
typically submit affidavit evidence in support of their positions and there is no oral testimony. Read the full article by S. Michelle Blendell with Young Anderson
Barristers & Solicitors.
British Columbia Unveils Pay
Transparency Reporting Tool
The British Columbia government has created a "Pay Transparency Reporting Tool" (the
"Reporting Tool") to assist employers in meeting their reporting obligations under the Pay Transparency Act (the "Act").
This blog supplements our previous post providing details on
the reporting requirements.
As discussed in our prior blog, the Act and the associated Pay Transparency Regulation detail the reporting obligations and methodologies for reporting employers. The Reporting Tool provides an online forum for employers to enter their pay transparency data and generate their report. Employers will need a Business BCeID to access the Reporting Tool. The government has also issued a guidance document to assist employers in navigating the Reporting Tool. Read the full article by Gary T. Clarke and Cameron Penn with Stikeman Elliot.
More than Words: An Employer's Conduct
Can Invalidate a Termination Clause
Despite the fact that an employment contract contained enforceable termination language, the British Columbia Supreme
Court recently found that an employee was entitled to common law reasonable notice and $25,000 in punitive damages as a
result of the employer's repudiatory conduct towards the employee.
We have previously written on what happens when an employer does not follow the terms of a written employment contract and then attempts to rely on it later. Klyn v. Pentax Canada Inc., 2024 BCSC 372, released on March 3, 2024, is a reminder for employers wishing to rely on the termination arrangements in their employment contracts that the work is not necessarily finished once the paperwork has been signed. Read the full article by Rachel Counsell with Fasken.
BC Sets Minimum Wage and Other
Protections for App-Based Workers
British Columbia has introduced new regulations to establish a minimum wage and basic protections for app-based ride-hailing
and delivery workers like Uber, DoorDash, and SkipTheDishes.
These rules, which will come into effect on September 3, marking a first in Canada, aim to address common concerns among app-based workers, including low and unpredictable pay, protection of tips, and lack of workers' compensation. Read the full article by Mika Pangilinan in the Canadian Occupational Safety magazine.
BC Court of Appeal Displaces Presumption of Common
Law Reasonable Notice in Wrongful Dismissal Case
The BC Court of Appeal upheld the enforceability of a termination clause in an employment contract that adhered to
the Canada Labour Code, thereby
displacing the presumption of common law reasonable notice.
In Egan v. Harbour Air Seaplanes LLP, 2024 BCCA 222, Gerard Michael Egan challenged the dismissal of his wrongful termination lawsuit against Harbour Air Seaplanes LLP. Egan, who was terminated without cause in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, argued that he was entitled to reasonable notice at common law. The court, however, upheld the enforceability of the termination clause in his employment contract, which incorporated the notice and severance provisions of the Canada Labour Code. Read the full article by Angelica Dino in the Canadian Lawyer.
Pitfalls of Dismissing Employees for
Unprofessional Use of Social Media
I will be commenting on a very interesting case that is, at its core, a case about free speech, but it also engages
disciplining employees for opinions they express outside of work on social media. The case is Kim v International
Triathlon Union, 2014 BCSC 2151, where the British
Columbia Supreme Court found that an employee's termination for questionable posts on social media was unjust and breached her
employment contract.
Background Facts
- Paula Kim was employed by the International Triathlon Union in the position of Senior Manager of Communications. At the time of her termination, she had worked two terms at ITU, between late 2006 and early 2009, and a second term from late 2010 until her termination.
- On November 20, 2012, ITU terminated her employment, without cause. On termination, ITU provided Ms. Kim with two weeks of her base salary in lieu of notice under the BC Employment Standards Act, plus an offer of a salary continuation until December 31, 2012, if she signed a release. She did not have a written employment agreement with ITU.
Read the full article by Angelika Erickson with Whitelaw Twining.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Employer Health Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 50 and 53 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Employment and Assistance Regulation (263/2002) | June 1/24 | by Reg 98/2024 |
June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 | |
Employment and Assistance for Persons with Disabilities Regulation (265/2002) | June 1/24 | by Reg 98/2024 |
June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 | |
Employment Standards Regulation (396/95) | June 13/24 | by Reg 130/2024 |
June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 | |
International Credentials Recognition Act | NEW July 1/24 |
c. 32, SBC 2023, Bill 39, sections 1 to 15, 17 to 20, 25 to 68 and 70 only (in force by Reg 129/2024) |
International Credentials Recognition Regulation (129/2024) | NEW July 1/24 |
see Reg 129/2024 |
Mental Disorder Presumption Regulation (136/2018) | June 10/24 | by Reg 122/2024 |
Workers Compensation Act Appeal Regulation (132/2024) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
BC Supreme Court Awards Damages in
ICBC Privacy Breach Class Action
The BC Supreme Court has awarded $15,000 in damages to each
class member in a class action lawsuit [2024 BCSC 964] against the Insurance
Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC).
The case arose when an ICBC employee, Candy Elaine Rheaume, improperly accessed and sold the personal information of ICBC customers. This breach resulted in the information being used for criminal activities, including arson and shooting attacks on the properties of 13 individuals. Read the full article by Angelica Dino in the Canadian Lawyer.
Canada Announces 30-Day Consultation on Measures to
Address
China's Trade Practices Related to Electric Vehicles
On July 2, 2024, Canada will initiate a 30-day consultation period on potential policy responses to China's rapid rise as
the world's largest manufacturer of electric vehicles (EVs). Canada alleges that unfair trade practices in the Chinese EV
industry directly and indirectly threaten electric vehicles in Canada.
Finance Canada announced the consultations in a June 24, 2024, press release. The announcement states the Canadian EV industry faces unfair competition from Chinese EVs due to Chinese industrial policies and "lack of rigorous labour and environmental standards" in China's EV industry. According to Canada, these measures have created a global oversupply in EVs that risks disincentivizing investments in EV production worldwide and in Canada. Read the full article by Sabrina A. Bandali, George W.H. Reid and Andrei Mesesan with Bennett Jones LLP.
BC Court of Appeal Overturns Damages Award for
Crash Injuries Due to Credibility Issues
In a recent decision, the BC Court of Appeal overturned a damages award for motor vehicle accident injuries, citing flaws
in the trial judge's findings on causation due to significant credibility issues and lack of corroborative evidence.
In McGlue v. Girvan, 2024 BCCA 208, Alasdair Girvan was involved in a motor vehicle accident when his vehicle was rear-ended by the appellant, who admitted liability. The primary issue at trial was whether Girvan could prove that the accident caused or exacerbated his injuries, which included pre-existing physical and psychological conditions. Read the full article by Angelica Dino in the Canadian Lawyer.
CVSE Bulletins & Notices
The following documents were posted recently by CVSE:
For more information on these and other items, visit the CVSE website.
Passenger Transportation
Board Bulletins
The following updates were recently published by the BC Passenger Transportation Board:
News and Updates
Applications Received
Application Decisions
Visit the Passenger Transportation Board website for more information.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Basic Vehicle Damage Coverage Regulation (4/2021) | June 3/24 | by Reg 73/2024 |
Head Office for I.C.B.C. (325/83) | REPEALED June 17/24 |
by Reg 139/2024 |
Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation (447/83) | June 18/24 | by Reg 153/2024 |
Motor Fuel Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 135, 137 to 139, 143, 146, 147 and 149 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Motor Vehicle Act | June 3/24 | by 2023 Bill 23, c. 17, sections 10 (f), 18, 19, 21 and 31 (in force by Reg 74/2024 and Reg 75/2024), Motor Vehicle Amendment Act, 2023 |
by 2019 Bill 35, c. 36, section 107 only (in force by Reg 73/2024), Miscellaneous Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2), 2019 | ||
Motor Vehicle Act Regulations (26/58) | June 1/24 | by Reg 290/2023 |
June 3/24 | by Reg 73/2024, Reg 74/2024 and Reg 75/2024 | |
Violation Ticket Administration and Fines Regulation (89/97) | June 1/24 | by Reg 292/2023 |
June 3/24 | by Reg 74/2024 and Reg 75/2024 | |
June 18/24 | by Reg 145/2024 |
New First Aid Requirements for
Certification and Training
Amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation
requirements for first aid come into effect on November 1, 2024. In
preparation for those changes, employers across the province will need
to conduct a first aid assessment in accordance with the new
requirements to determine what level of first aid attendant and
equipment they will require. In this article, we’ll discuss the changes
to first aid certification levels, training and transition planning for
first aid attendants, and resources that will soon be available to help
employers make these changes. Read the full article in the Summer 2024 issue of WorkSafe Magazine.
BC Court Orders New Hearing on Worker’s Mental Disorder
Claim Due to Expert's Incomplete Information
The BC Supreme Court set aside the Workers’ Compensation
Appeal Tribunal's (WCAT) decision on a worker’s mental disorder
compensation claim due to procedural unfairness and reliance on
incomplete information from an expert. In J.T. v British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2024 BCSC 994,
J.T., J.T., a security guard with Scarlet West Coast Security Ltd.,
sought judicial review after WCAT denied his appeal against the Workers’
Compensation Board's rejection of his mental disorder compensation
claim. Read the full article by Angelica Dino with Canadian Lawyer.
BC Federation of Labour Welcomes Expansion of
Mental Health Presumption Coverage
The British Columbia Federation of Labour (BCFED)
welcomed the recent announcement from the provincial government that
provides more workers with easier access to workers’ compensation for
psychological injuries caused by work-related trauma. Recently, the
provincial government added 11 occupations to the mental health
presumption under the Workers Compensation Act. Read the full article by Jim Wilson published in Canadian Occupational Safety Magazine.
July 2024 Public Hearing on Proposed
Regulatory Amendments
WorkSafeBC is holding a virtual public hearing on proposed amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. The virtual public hearing will be streamed live on July 24, 2024, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Further
information on how to view or participate in the virtual public hearing will be provided closer to the hearing date. These details will be
posted on worksafebc.com. You can access the proposed amendments, along with explanatory notes, using the links below:
Part 20, Washroom Facilities at Construction Sites
Part 16, Mobile Equipment, sections 16.21 to 16.21.1 – Seat belts
Read the official WorkSafe BC release.
Enhancing Crane Safety in British ColumbiaAct or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Mental Disorder Presumption Regulation (136/2018) | June 10/24 | by Reg 122/2024 |
Workers Compensation Act Appeal Regulation (132/2024) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |
British Columbia Court of Appeal Clarifies Owner’s Right to
Pay Holdback into Court to Discharge Liens on Title
If an owner agrees to pay amounts owed by a contractor
to its subcontractors to avoid lien claims being filed, how does this
affect the owner's right to pay the holdback into court under section 23 of the Builders Lien Act, S.B.C. 1997, c. 45 (the Act) to discharge lien claims? The Court of Appeal in Pinnacle Living (Capstan Village) Lands Inc. v. Fairway Recycle Group Inc.
has recently weighed in on this important question. Section 23 of the
Act allows an owner to discharge lien claims from title by paying a
prescribed holdback amount into court as security if the lien claims are
filed by a class of lien claimants “other than a class of lien
claimants engaged by the owner.” Read the full article by the Dentons Canada's Construction group.
Duty Calls: BCCA Considers Duty of Care Owed by
Structural Consultants to Building Owners
Centurion Apartment Properties Limited Partnership v Sorenson Trilogy Ltd., 2024 BCCA 25
The British Columbia Court of Appeal (BCCA) recently held that structural consultants have a prima facie
duty of care to the owner of a building to ensure that the building
does not contain defects that pose a foreseeable danger to the health
and safety of its occupants.
Background
In 2017, 113407 B.C. Ltd. retained DB Services of Victoria Inc. (DB) to design and construct an 11-storey residential apartment building in Langford, British Columbia (BC). DB Services then retained Sorenson Trilogy Engineering Ltd. (STE) to act as structural engineers on the project. The court noted that although STE was not competent to provide structural engineering services due to a lack of expertise for this size of building, they undertook to do so anyway.
Read the full article by Denise D. Bright, Jason D. Roth, Brian P. Reid and Graham Bowden with Bennett Jones LLP.
Electronic Meetings and Proxies
Dear Tony:
Is it possible for owners in a strata corporation to determine how our general meetings are being held? Prior to the Covid era, we had in person meetings, we always struggled with a quorum, and one person always controlled the meetings with a fist of proxies. During the restrictions we held meetings electronically, our owners attending more than doubled, and very few proxies were ever issued. Now we are back at in person meetings because of our president, and he showed up at last week’s meeting with 47 proxies. In a community of 120 units, this guaranteed he had the controlling votes and determined the outcome of decisions and council. Do owners have any say in the type of meeting we hold? – BDR, Surrey
Dear BDR:
The decision on the type of meeting is determined by the strata council and within the limitations of your bylaws and the Strata Property Act; however, there is an option where the owners by majority vote can direct the council, including the type of meeting being conducted. Twenty percent of the owners can petition for a special general meeting or add an agenda item at your next general meeting, to vote to direct council to conduct meetings electronically.
Read the full article by Tony Gioventu on Condo Smarts, published by CHOA.
Holdback Liens Against Holdbacks Up the Construction Chain –
Hi-Tide Shoring & Foundations (2012) Ltd. v Chandos Construction Ltd.
In the recent case of Hi-Tide Shoring & Foundation (2012) Ltd. v Chandos Construction Ltd.,
the British Columbia Supreme Court considered whether a
sub-subcontractor on a construction project may claim a holdback lien
against the holdbacks held up the construction chain or was limited to
claiming against the holdback that relates to the sub-subcontractor’s
own contract. The Court said that subcontractors may claim against
holdbacks retained at each level of the construction chain up to the
holdback retained by the owner. However, when it comes time to determine
how much the subcontractor is paid for that claim of lien, section 34
of the Builders Lien Act may limit the amount the lien claimants may recover through such claims. Read the full article by Marcela Ouatu with Civic Legal LLP.
Act or Regulation Affected | Effective Date | Amendment Information |
Property Transfer Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 196 and 203 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
shíshálh Nation Designation Regulation (489/88) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
Short-Term Rental Accommodations Regulation (268/2023) | June 10/24 | by Reg 128/2024 |
Speculation and Vacancy Tax Act | July 1/24 | by 2024 Bill 3, c. 13, sections 246 and 248 only (in force by Reg 133/2024), Budget Measures Implementation Act, 2024 |
Strata Property Act | July 1/24 | by 2020 Bill 14, c. 16, sections 4 and 12 only (in force by Reg 88/2024), Municipal Affairs and Housing Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2), 2020 |
Strata Property Regulation (43/2000) | June 10/24 | by Reg 123/2024 |
July 1/24 | by Reg 88/2024 | |
Real Estate Services Rules (209/2021) | July 1/24 | by Reg 101/2024 |
Residential Tenancy Regulation (477/2003) | June 28/24 | by Reg 132/2024 |