View All News

Latest News

Apr 08 2025

Health Care Costs Recovery Amendment Act, 2025 Introduced

Bill 9, Health Care Costs Recovery Amendment Act, 2025 was introduced on April 8 and proposes amendments to the Health Care Costs Recovery Act to allow the government greater recovery of health-care costs provided to MSP beneficiaries who have been injured or have died due to the negligence of a wrongdoer. The legislation intends to:

  • narrow the circumstances in which the act does not apply because the beneficiary was injured in the course of their work;
  • increase the time during which a claim can be amended to include a health services claim;
  • expand disclosure obligations for defendants and their insurers;
  • define who counts as an “insurer” under the act to ensure that self-insured and mutual defence organizations must provide notice to the Province and information needed to assist cost recovery;
  • clarify the effect of liability waivers;
  • require that the Province be notified when a third-party defendant is added to the legal proceedings, and automatically include a health-care costs claim against the third-party defendant when this happens;
  • extend limitation periods to ensure the Province has time to begin legal proceedings after being informed of a claim; and
  • allow pre-judgment interest to be collected from defendants.

If passed, the Bill will come into force by regulation on a future date. Read the full government information bulletin.

Read More
Mar 30 2025

Quickscribe Alerts Now Include Summaries of Bills

We are excited to announce an enhancement to your Quickscribe Alerts. Previously, summaries of bills were accessible only via the Supplemental Note directly adjacent to a bill on Quickscribe's Bill page. Starting today, these summaries will also be included in the BC Legislative Digest and Quickscribe Reporter client alerts. This new feature ensures you will receive timely notification of newly introduced legislation, while providing you concise insights into each bill's intent, helping you quickly assess its potential impact on your area of interest.

A reminder that you may sign up to receive these and other customizable alerts at any time via My Alerts.

Read More
Mar 28 2025

Changes to the Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) Act

On March 28, Premier David Eby announced that Bill 7, the Economic Stabilization (Tariff Response) Act, would be amended in response to criticism that the proposed legislation would give the government the power to bypass the legislature. The proposed amendment would remove Part 4, which would have allowed the government to make regulations to modify existing laws. The government will be proceeding with Parts 1 to 3 of the bill, which are intended to remove barriers to interprovincial trade, allow procurement directives to public sector bodies, and allow a system of fees for use of BC infrastructure, and the bill will be debated in the legislature as the session continues.

Read More
Recent Contributions From Our Experts

One of the leading decisions on the phrase, "excessive hours" is BC EST # D071/10 Johnston. The employee worked 14 hours on an election day and argued that "excessive" should be interpreted to mean a shift in excess of 12 hours. The Director considered the dictionary definit...

Annotator Image

Scott Marcinkow, Harper Grey LLP on EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ACT

In Wilkinson v. Chartier, 2025 BCCA 53, the Court of Appeal overturned the chambers judge’s order granting summary judgment in relation to trust claims brought under s. 151 of WESA on the basis that the claims were statute barred by the Limitation Act. The Court of Appeal held...

Annotator Image

OnPoint Legal Research, Onpoint Legal Research Law Corporation on LIMITATION ACT

Nesbitt v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 1661: Section 24 of the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183, provides a limited statutory immunity. The immunity applies to members of the College board and persons acting on behalf of the C...

Annotator Image

Joel Morris, Harper Grey LLP on HEALTH PROFESSIONS ACT

In White (Re), the BC Supreme Court sitting in bankruptcy held that new evidence may be admitted in appeals under this section. The normally restrictive rules around new evidence, as set out in Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, would work injustice if applied to the “...

Annotator Image

Greg Gehlen, GEHLEN DABBS CASH LLP on BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT [FEDERAL]

The Court of Appeal quashed a decision of the Tribunal that denied legal representation on the basis that legal counsel could instead provide assistance anonymously and behind the scenes.

The constitutionality of the Civil Resolution Tribunal's limitation on legal representat...

Annotator Image

Melanie Harmer, McMillan LLP on CIVIL RESOLUTION TRIBUNAL ACT

Section 36 of the Property Law Act does not apply to the Crown land owned or controlled by the Provincial government: Fox v British Columbia (Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development), 2022 BCSC 541

Annotator Image

Peter Roberts, Lawson Lundell LLP on PROPERTY LAW ACT

The implications of this section are canvassed by Jennifer Bednard in "Will or Will Not: Practice Implications of Section 58 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act Part I: What is a Testamentary Document Anyway?" (2020) 78 Advocate 527.

Annotator Image

D. Michael Bain, K.C., Hamilton Howell Bain & Gould on WILLS, ESTATES AND SUCCESSION ACT

This section was drawn from section 2.1 of the Arbitration Act, RSBC 1996, c. 55, and is needlessly confusing. On the one hand it seems to say that people can agree to arbitration anything that "may be the subject of a family law dispute in the future," while on the other is s...

Annotator Image

John-Paul Boyd QC, John-Paul E. Boyd Arbitration Chambers on FAMILY LAW ACT

The purpose of this provision, embodying as it does the common law “indoor management rule” is clear: persons doing business with a corporation should not have to be concerned about whether the company’s internal business housekeeping is in order. Instead, it is the company th...

Annotator Image

Debby Cumberford, Deborah M. Cumberford on BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT

In Ocean Pacific Hotels v. Lee, 2025 BCCA 57, the Court of Appeal overturned the certification judge’s order certifying the common issues relating to the claim for contractual breaches. In the Court’s view, it was plain and obvious that the pleadings as drafted did not disclos...

Annotator Image

OnPoint Legal Research, Onpoint Legal Research Law Corporation on CLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT

Decisions of the court under s. 17 are not limited appeal orders and therefore leave is not required under s. 11 of the Court of Appeal Rules to appeal.

Annotator Image

Melanie Harmer, McMillan LLP on JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEDURE ACT

The term "obsolete" means something that is "no longer practised or used, discarded; [and] out of date". A determination of obsolescence is a consideration of the nature of the charge itself in the circumstances of the use of the relevant property and a determination of whet...

Annotator Image

Peter Roberts, Lawson Lundell LLP on PROPERTY LAW ACT

The Mental Health Act has no purpose or principles guiding statutory interpretation and application. In A.T. v. British Columbia (Mental Health Review Board), 2023 BCCA 283 at paras. 68-73 the Court summarized different purposes that can be found through jurisprudence and legi...

Annotator Image

Laura Johnston, Health Justice on MENTAL HEALTH ACT

It is not always necessary to show that the proposed action is in the best interest of the estate. It may be sufficient if it is necessary or expedient to protect the interest of a specified person.

Annotator Image

Stanley Rule, Sabey Rule LLP on WILLS, ESTATES AND SUCCESSION ACT

In Mithaq Canada Inc. 2024 ONCMT 9 the Ontario Capital Markets Tribunal (Tribunal) dismissed the application of Mithaq Capital SPC (Mithaq) to cease trade a private placement that Aimia Inc. (Aimia) completed in October 2023. Mithaq had asserted that the private placement was ...

Annotator Image

Teresa Tomchak, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP on NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 62-104 TAKE-OVER BIDS AND ISSUER BIDS (B.C. Reg. 21/2008)

Maddock v. British Columbia, 2022 BCSC 1605: Section 54(h) empowers the Provincial Health Officer ("PHO") to decline the request of a person affected to reconsider (s. 43), review (s. 44), or reassess (s. 45) an order or a variance order during an emergency. This provision exi...

Annotator Image

Joel Morris, Harper Grey LLP on PUBLIC HEALTH ACT

This provision is mandatory and there is no discretion to order payment to be made to someone other than the PGT. See 2019 BCCA 171 at paras 7 - 11.

Annotator Image

Dan Orsetti, Public Guardian And Trustee of British Columbia on WILLS, ESTATES AND SUCCESSION ACT

In Cohen 2023 BCSECCOM 317 an application was made to the BC Securities Commission for orders than notice delivered under an advance notice policy requiring notice with respect to the election of directors be included in a circular and that the shareholder vote be restrained u...

Annotator Image

Teresa Tomchak, Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP on SECURITIES ACT

In CARDON Group, Re., 2024 BCIPC 102, the adjudicator exercised her discretion available under s. 50(1) of PIPA to cancel an inquiry which was deemed moot, as a result of the applicant revealing during her submissions that she already had a copy of the unredacted documents at ...

Annotator Image

Karen Zimmer, Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP on FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PRIVACY ACT

The policy considerations underlying section 60 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act, together with the nature of constructive trusts was the subject of some debate in a series of articles published in The Advocate in 2022.

A healthy and respectful canvassing of positi...

Annotator Image

D. Michael Bain, K.C., Hamilton Howell Bain & Gould on WILLS, ESTATES AND SUCCESSION ACT

This amendment means that all minimum rates will be automatically determined by the previous year's average inflation rate for the province of BC. The increase will take effect on June 1 each year, except for agricultural piece rates that will increase on December 31 each yea...

Annotator Image

Scott Marcinkow, Harper Grey LLP on EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ACT

In Singh v Singh, 2020 BCCA 21, the Court of Appeal restricts the nature of the "other factors" that may be argued in favour of reapoprtionment. Justice Garson reviews the specific factors identified in section 95(2) and, applying the principles of statutory interpretation, co...

Annotator Image

John-Paul Boyd QC, John-Paul E. Boyd Arbitration Chambers on FAMILY LAW ACT

Provisions in the Act which prohibit specific types of ipso facto clauses, such as this one, which invalidates clauses that grant an accelerated payment or forfeiture of term because of someone’s filing of a Notice of Intention, do not oust the general common law “anti-depriva...

Annotator Image

Greg Gehlen, GEHLEN DABBS CASH LLP on BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY ACT [FEDERAL]

The filing of a Notice of Dispute is a "proceeding" for the purpose of this section. After a Notice of Dispute is filed, the court may appoint an administrator pending legal proceedings. In Glendale v. Walker, 2024 BCSC 1947, the disputant successfully brought a petition to ap...

Annotator Image

Stanley Rule, Sabey Rule LLP on WILLS, ESTATES AND SUCCESSION ACT

In Clearview AI Inc. v. Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia, 2024 BCSC 2311, the BC Supreme Court rendered an important decision respecting the application of BC’s Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”) to the activities of a foreign company, findin...

Annotator Image

Karen Zimmer, Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP on PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION ACT

In July 2022 the Ombudsperson’s Office released “Systemic Investigation Update: Report on the Implementation of Recommendations from Committed to Change: Protecting the Rights of Involuntary Patients under the Mental Health Act”, which considers whether and how its recommendat...

Annotator Image

Laura Johnston, Health Justice on MENTAL HEALTH REGULATION 233/99

The legislative intent in fashioning the derivative action leave provisions required that leave be obtained before such action is filed. The provision stipulates that a complainant may, with leave of the court, prosecute a legal proceeding. The corollary is that a complainant...

Annotator Image

Debby Cumberford, Deborah M. Cumberford on BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT

Receive timely notifications when our experts publish new annotations

Create Your Own Custom Alerts

Quickscribe Online 2.0 makes it easy to get advanced notice of important legislative developments that are most important to you!

FREE TRIAL>

See for yourself why Quickscribe is now the go-to source for legislation in BC. No credit card required. No invoices issued.